Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-25
17:31:22 gmann andreykurilin: just read your last msg about 403 is already propagated. can you check what error msg it say?
17:49:09 gmann andreykurilin: bcz I am not sure where we handle the neutron 403, but it is propagated in both cases addSecurityGroup and removeSecurityGroup ? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/security_groups.py#L421-L430 https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/eb5e3374bcb5de3b5986b66438a59c73be7fb596/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py#L667
18:15:54 andreykurilin gmann: `RESP BODY: {"forbidden": {"code": 403, "message": "rule:update_port is disallowed by policy\nNeutron server returns request_ids: ['req-97c54f6e-6876-4cf4-9657-b8b3be322f57’]”}}`. vs `RESP BODY: {"forbidden": {"code": 403, "message": "Policy doesn't allow os_compute_api:os-security-groups:add to be performed.”}}` in case of Nova’s native policy error.
18:16:26 andreykurilin Despite the fact neutron errors have an extra 'suffix' line with request-id, mo, adding some prefix to error's from neutron should give more visibility of "guilty" side.
18:22:32 andreykurilin gmann: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/network/neutron.py#L213-L214 neutronclient’s 403 is handled on ‘globally’
18:23:09 gmann andreykurilin: right. did not check that. ++
18:23:20 andreykurilin Yeah, It took me a while to find it
18:24:05 gmann andreykurilin: then you can just add 400 case in Remove SG case
18:24:18 gmann all these handling are so deep in code and hard to find :)
18:26:20 andreykurilin gmann: thank you! I’ll update my patch yesterday with a proper release note.
18:26:35 gmann andreykurilin: ++ thanks
18:34:25 andreykurilin *tomorrow (need to relax )
19:18:10 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Change force_format strategy to catch mismatches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924734
20:08:21 opendevreview Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: [ironic] Factor out metadata and send to ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923910
21:13:32 JayF sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923910 + https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/924887 are tested working in devstack. Still have to write a small migration script and some tempest tests, but wanted to get general agreement on the shape of the change before going further. If you could have a look I'd appreciate it. (/me goes and asks the same of Ironic cores)
21:46:21 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Remove AMI snapshot format special case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924982
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-26
01:33:15 opendevreview Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: remove exception.RescheduledException check as _validate_instance_group_policy doesnot rasie this exception https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924988
05:29:54 ralonsoh dansmith, yes, thanks. Sorry for not replying yesterday, it was public holiday in some regions of Spain
05:30:20 ralonsoh I think we are good now in Neutron
08:30:39 opendevreview Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/nova master: Fix image conversion check in finish_migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897842
08:36:17 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Remove AMI snapshot format special case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924999
08:37:48 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Remove AMI snapshot format special case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925000
08:38:40 sean-k-mooney bauzas: gmann: if ye are around im backporting the fix for the ami snapshot regression
08:39:01 sean-k-mooney bauzas: gmann https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924982
08:39:03 bauzas cve sage, season 2, episode 203
08:39:09 bauzas saga*
08:39:34 sean-k-mooney once those merged im going to create the release patches
08:39:51 sean-k-mooney and ill add ye to review them
08:40:37 bauzas sean-k-mooney: can you then lookup another stable change ?
08:40:44 bauzas before asking for a stable release
08:40:55 bauzas sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924514
08:41:05 bauzas and the other backports
08:41:06 sean-k-mooney sure
08:41:17 bauzas we could then create stable releases
08:41:20 bauzas thanks
08:41:21 sean-k-mooney we can include that
08:41:51 sean-k-mooney ill see what else is ready but i would like to do the release either todya or early next week
08:42:05 sean-k-mooney bauzas: when are you on pto again from monday?
08:43:34 bauzas no, I'll start my usuall ~3-week PTO by Friday 2 Aug
08:43:51 bauzas still 5 days to work :)
08:44:32 sean-k-mooney ok i was going to ask if i should get added a release liasion until rene is back
08:44:42 sean-k-mooney but if your around until then no need
08:45:26 sean-k-mooney we can discuss the release then on tuesday and ill prepare the patches based on whats merged monday evening
08:47:00 bauzas ++
09:43:48 jlejeune bauzas: sean-k-mooney: now you have merged all the patchs related to the last CVE, maybe you can review my small fix in unit tests: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924148 :)
09:43:56 jlejeune hello BTW :)
10:08:55 sean-k-mooney jlejeune: oh yes we can merge that now and start backproting it too
10:09:07 sean-k-mooney it would be good to include that in the same release
10:09:37 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ^
11:47:02 bauzas sent to the gate ^
11:57:33 jlejeune bauzas: sean-k-mooney: thanks
11:58:14 sean-k-mooney jlejeune: do you want to do the submistion of the cerry-picks once its merged?
11:58:33 sean-k-mooney if not ill do it
12:00:01 jlejeune sean-k-mooney: I will
12:00:28 jlejeune I have to do it over 2023.1 / 2023.2 and 2024.1 right ?
12:00:44 sean-k-mooney yep form newst to oldest
12:01:03 sean-k-mooney so master->2024.1->2023.2->2023.1
12:01:04 jlejeune ok so firt on 2024.1
12:01:09 sean-k-mooney yep
12:01:15 jlejeune got it
12:06:27 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924148
12:16:09 sean-k-mooney jlejeune: ^ :)
12:16:41 sean-k-mooney unit test only fixes like this get to skip all the tempest josb so they are actully really fast to merge
12:21:01 opendevreview Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925011
12:22:45 opendevreview Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925012
12:24:01 opendevreview Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925014
12:24:12 sean-k-mooney jlejeune: the second cherry pick is missing the cherrypcik line form the previous one
12:24:32 sean-k-mooney basically you shoudl have one (cherry picked from commit ...) per branch as you go back
12:24:55 sean-k-mooney the sha shoudl be the full commit sha from the previous cherrypick
12:25:33 jlejeune hm ok, sorry it was my first time
12:25:54 sean-k-mooney its ok
12:26:04 sean-k-mooney i mentioned it because we have a ci job that checks
12:27:42 opendevreview Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925012
12:29:02 opendevreview Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925014
12:30:18 sean-k-mooney jlejeune: we will try and include those in the next release we do next week
12:31:00 jlejeune perfect
12:31:15 sean-k-mooney thanks for fixing this
12:37:06 jlejeune no prob :)
13:18:38 sean-k-mooney bauzas: as i said downstream im goign to call it a day would you mind landing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925011 and the other backprot in order
13:50:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925011
15:20:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925012
15:22:51 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Use format_inspector from oslo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925025
15:22:51 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test against oslo.utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925026
18:03:18 opendevreview Mike Lowe proposed openstack/nova master: Parse alias from domain hostdev for MDEV https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925037
18:38:11 dansmith melwitt: I guess sean is offline but the above DNM test of the oslo format_inspector passed for the devstack jobs
18:38:26 dansmith just fyi in terms of the changes necessary for that
18:40:44 melwitt ok cool
19:24:42 opendevreview Mike Lowe proposed openstack/nova master: Parse alias from domain hostdev for MDEV https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925037
22:06:42 opendevreview Mike Lowe proposed openstack/nova master: OParse alias from domain hostdev for MDEV https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925037
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-27
13:01:18 MajidKhoram_ thanks MajidKhoram Iim loving OpenStack
13:07:45 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Report availability of stateless firmware support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908888
13:07:45 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908890
13:08:35 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Report availability of stateless firmware support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908888
13:08:35 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908890
13:11:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ensure swtpm_ioctl is available for vTPM support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908546
13:11:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Detect vtpm support by libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908508
13:11:30 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Report available TPM models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909183
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-28
12:52:15 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908890
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-29
07:12:17 jlejeune bauzas: hello, I would need a one more review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925014 please :)
08:28:37 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Fix test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit and test_vmdk_bad_descriptor_mem_limit_stream_optimized https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925014

Earlier   Later