| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-07-23 | |||
| 16:01:47 | bauzas__ | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2071734 | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas__ | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:02:12 | bauzas__ | so, voila we have another CVE fix | |
| 16:02:30 | bauzas__ | do people want to discuss about it ? | |
| 16:02:58 | bauzas__ | if not, I have a question | |
| 16:04:00 | bauzas__ | given the problem with the image module, should we working on it this cycle ? | |
| 16:04:06 | bauzas__ | if so, it would be a priority | |
| 16:04:44 | sean-k-mooney | there may be more work we do to harden it but likely we will need to take a step back and do tha tnext cycle | |
| 16:05:05 | sean-k-mooney | this cycle we may do so prep work or adtopation with the moving of the code to oslo | |
| 16:05:34 | sean-k-mooney | i know dan cant attend today and he has some tought on this topic | |
| 16:05:40 | sean-k-mooney | so we can bring it up again next week | |
| 16:05:56 | bauzas__ | then at least we should maybe stop to merge new changes for that module | |
| 16:06:01 | bauzas__ | unless it's a priority | |
| 16:06:38 | bauzas__ | the more we accept, the more it could be difficult for the oslo usage | |
| 16:06:49 | bauzas__ | is dansmith around ? | |
| 16:08:03 | tkajinam | are you talking about the image module in oslo or one in nova ? | |
| 16:08:41 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas__: no they are away for the next while | |
| 16:08:45 | sean-k-mooney | tkajinam: the one in nova | |
| 16:09:04 | bauzas__ | tkajinam: we want to move the module to oslo | |
| 16:09:19 | sean-k-mooney | yep so until that happens we likely shoudl stablise it | |
| 16:09:47 | sean-k-mooney | we dont wnat to have them diverge more while we are porting | |
| 16:09:55 | bauzas__ | if we don't have quorum for now, then let's disucss this next week | |
| 16:10:01 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 16:10:02 | bauzas__ | moving on then | |
| 16:10:32 | tkajinam | ok then I'll try to follow the discussion before I do +2+A actual implementations | |
| 16:10:41 | bauzas__ | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:11:04 | bauzas__ | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:11:16 | bauzas__ | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:11:24 | bauzas__ | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:11:43 | bauzas__ | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/build/132eaea6e65c41a1a508163b9c1f82b2 tempest-integrated-placement FAILURE on unmaintained/zed branch | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas__ | I just looked at it ^ | |
| 16:12:20 | bauzas__ | this is just a problem when creating dbcounter | |
| 16:12:40 | bauzas__ | hopefully the next run won't have problems | |
| 16:12:59 | bauzas__ | so unless someone finds something for this job run, let's continue | |
| 16:13:55 | bauzas__ | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:14:08 | bauzas__ | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:14:19 | bauzas__ | anything else about the gate ? | |
| 16:14:24 | frickler | ah, is that the setuptools issue? I think nova was having something similar | |
| 16:14:39 | bauzas__ | frickler: yeah looks to me | |
| 16:15:16 | frickler | fix should be https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/924740 then, but maybe also dansmith will have some other idea | |
| 16:16:25 | bauzas__ | ack but this is for zed | |
| 16:16:47 | bauzas__ | as said, this branch is "unmaintained" | |
| 16:16:55 | bauzas__ | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:17:07 | bauzas__ | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:17:18 | bauzas__ | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:17:28 | bauzas__ | #info Dalmatian-3 in 5 weeks | |
| 16:17:34 | bauzas__ | #info Spec approval freeze happened | |
| 16:17:45 | bauzas__ | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/2024.2 16 approved blueprints | |
| 16:18:03 | bauzas__ | you can see all of them here ^ | |
| 16:18:12 | bauzas__ | anything else to discuss ? | |
| 16:18:34 | bauzas__ | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:18:42 | bauzas__ | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:18:51 | bauzas__ | all of the approved blueprint series are there ^ | |
| 16:19:29 | bauzas__ | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:19:38 | bauzas__ | elodilles is on PTO this week | |
| 16:19:46 | bauzas__ | so let's discuss that topic next week | |
| 16:19:55 | bauzas__ | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:20:00 | fwiesel | #info No updates. | |
| 16:20:02 | bauzas__ | fwiesel: anything to report ? | |
| 16:20:04 | bauzas__ | cool | |
| 16:20:07 | bauzas__ | moving on then | |
| 16:20:14 | bauzas__ | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:20:18 | bauzas__ | I have one item | |
| 16:20:23 | bauzas__ | (bauzas) Aug 6, 13 and 20 nova meetings | |
| 16:20:29 | bauzas__ | I'll be on PTO those weeks | |
| 16:20:40 | bauzas__ | if someone wants to run them, cool | |
| 16:20:58 | bauzas__ | if not, I gonna skip those | |
| 16:22:02 | sean-k-mooney | we proably shoudl keep them but we dont need to decied that now | |
| 16:22:06 | bauzas__ | okay, I'll tell about that again next week | |
| 16:22:12 | bauzas__ | that's it for me | |
| 16:22:23 | weanew | Hi! I've submitted a patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923395 Could someone take a look at it please? | |
| 16:22:25 | bauzas__ | anything else people want to discuss ? | |
| 16:22:47 | bauzas__ | weanew: we try to avoid review requests during nova meetings | |
| 16:22:59 | sean-k-mooney | that is a pretty old bug | |
| 16:23:15 | sean-k-mooney | and im not sure its one we really want to fix | |
| 16:24:02 | sean-k-mooney | i dont have time today to review but it will depend on the perfomace impact of the fix | |
| 16:24:11 | sean-k-mooney | we proably dot want to downcall to all cells for example | |
| 16:25:47 | sean-k-mooney | with that said ill try and review it properly in the next few days | |
| 16:26:02 | sean-k-mooney | if there is nothign else i think we can close the meeting | |
| 16:26:41 | weanew | Thank you, I don't have quations | |
| 16:26:57 | bauzas__ | cool | |
| 16:27:04 | bauzas__ | then we can close this meeting | |
| 16:27:06 | bauzas__ | thanks all | |
| 16:27:09 | bauzas__ | #endmeeting | |
| 16:27:09 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 23 16:27:09 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:27:09 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-23-16.00.html | |
| 16:27:09 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-23-16.00.txt | |
| 16:27:09 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-23-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:27:32 | fwiesel | thanks a lot | |
| 16:32:34 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] testing nova-live-migation fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924762 | |
| 16:34:04 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Follow up for "libvirt: AMD SEV-ES support" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924563 | |
| 16:38:38 | tkajinam | bauzas: Could you check the follow up of SEV-ES spec when you have time ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924563 | |
| 16:39:10 | tkajinam | I left the comment in it as well as https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/907702 (original one) | |
| 16:39:51 | clarkb | frickler: I think the correct fix is to bump https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/branch/stable/2023.1/upper-constraints.txt#L339 to package 22.0 or newer | |
| 16:40:03 | clarkb | and note that I expect 2023.1 is broken and not just unmaintained | |
| 16:40:13 | clarkb | due to upper contraints specifying 21.3 there | |
| 16:41:05 | sean-k-mooney | fun are there fixes in flight for that | |
| 16:42:09 | clarkb | not that I am aware of. The only thing I've seen is the patch taht disable the dbcounter which isn't really a fix | |
| 16:42:18 | clarkb | https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/4483 is the upstream issue fwiw | |
| 16:45:46 | sean-k-mooney | so we could fix this by pinning setuptools on stable until they move to unmaintainted | |