Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-06-04
16:42:14 bauzas yeah, lvm seems the easiast approach
16:42:25 marlinc (Also actually the functional test for live migration, honestly I have never implemented something so complex as I have no experience at all with the testing framework and how it works in Nova)
16:42:26 bauzas but that's not my own garden :)
16:42:48 marlinc Especially since there is no existing volume based live migration functional I could see
16:42:54 bauzas marlinc: once you get a go from the cinder folks about exposing the rotation rate, come to me
16:43:03 sean-k-mooney marlinc: if cinder accpet the enhancement we can revisit that and or help you with that
16:43:07 marlinc Alright
16:43:20 bauzas cool
16:43:23 bauzas moving on then
16:43:26 marlinc Thank you, I'll update our internal ticket
16:43:44 bauzas marlinc: I assume you know how to reach the cinder folks?
16:44:36 marlinc Well, I'm going to assume #openstack-cinder and I'll check their contribution documentation
16:44:39 bauzas I have no potential design disapproval on using a specific connection info detail for setting the right value in the xml
16:45:00 sean-k-mooney marlinc: yep thats the correct channel
16:45:05 bauzas but you'll need to write a nova spec for explaining that it'll require a recent enough cinder and new computes
16:45:19 sean-k-mooney by the way there may be a usecase here for nova local storage too.
16:45:22 marlinc I was maybe a bit afraid though about the special rotation_rate 1 that is libvirt specific
16:45:23 bauzas and testing will be interesting to be discussed in the spec proocess
16:45:40 marlinc But that is probably something for the spec
16:45:52 bauzas the rotation rate is storage specific
16:46:07 bauzas how you tune it for the guest is libvirt specific indeed
16:46:34 marlinc That is why, right now we return rotation_rate 1 for SSDs, however that might not be smart from a cinder -> nova integration perspective
16:46:42 marlinc It is a magic value
16:46:56 sean-k-mooney well really your tryign to say "this is an ssd" or not
16:46:58 bauzas we're overtime and we still have two topics to discuss
16:47:05 sean-k-mooney afnd there may be better way to express that
16:47:15 bauzas but I think we may need to discuss that from a cross-project perspective
16:47:19 sean-k-mooney ya lets continue this converatoin after the meeting
16:47:23 marlinc Yes that is right now the primary use case though we also use it to set it to 7200 for HDDs
16:47:32 marlinc Alright thank you
16:47:38 bauzas next one then (3 of 4)
16:47:45 bauzas Luzi: floating ip behavior (assign fip: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2060808 , remove fip: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2060812)
16:47:47 Luzi these two bugs describe changes with the neutron handling of floating ips (compared to the deprecated nova code). 1. one allows allocating a floating ip to a vm even if it is attached to another vm ("stealing" it). The 2. one does not check the VM when removing a floating ip, resulting in always removing the ip (even if the vm-name was correct, and the ip a mistake)
16:48:17 bauzas are you asking for reviews on the nova patch ?
16:48:24 Luzi I raised that at the PTG with Neutron, but they wanted Nova poeple to look over it, and tell, whether you want to change these bahaviors or not
16:48:33 bauzas oh my bad
16:49:08 Luzi (i normally don't have time to attend the Nova meetings)
16:49:31 Luzi I would be glad if you could check out these bugs again and give your input on it
16:49:56 bauzas Luzi: well, it's hard to comment those bugs on a limited timeframe
16:50:09 Luzi yeah, we can discuss this on launchpad also
16:50:11 bauzas could you please go back to the nova channel on another time ?
16:50:15 Luzi sure
16:50:31 bauzas Luzi: well, what's your timezone, please remind me ?
16:50:39 Luzi UTC-1
16:51:09 bauzas okay, would that work if you would ping us again on tomorrow UTC afternoon ?
16:51:34 Luzi yeah i can do taht
16:51:43 bauzas thanks
16:52:01 bauzas last one
16:52:05 bauzas kgube: re-proposed extend volume completion spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/917133
16:52:12 kgube Hi, this is just a review request
16:52:27 bauzas cool, we'll review all the proposed specs indeed
16:52:40 kgube The spec has been reproposed from last cycle and not much has changed
16:52:49 bauzas I think I need to remember the exact situation we had last cycle
16:53:06 bauzas and why this didn't get enough traction
16:53:18 bauzas I think we were basically awaiting cinder's feedback, right?
16:53:21 kgube The cinder dependencies had to get merged
16:53:31 bauzas yah that
16:53:42 bauzas and the cinder spec was accepted ?
16:53:47 kgube but cinderclient now supports the feature
16:54:05 bauzas okay, so where are we exactly on the cinder side ?
16:54:17 bauzas everything eventually got merged ?
16:54:46 kgube well, there are some cinder changes left, but they depend on the nova change again
16:54:55 bauzas yeah
16:54:58 bauzas I remember that
16:55:09 bauzas but okay, that's on our plate now
16:55:21 bauzas I'll then review the spec reproposal
16:55:27 sean-k-mooney they depend on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873560 right
16:55:28 kgube thanks!
16:55:38 sean-k-mooney which was waiting for the cinder client release
16:55:42 bauzas yeah
16:55:42 sean-k-mooney which has now happened
16:55:46 bauzas exactly
16:56:00 sean-k-mooney ok then if that can be rebased
16:56:05 bauzas I don't see anything controversial but I'll just doublecheck
16:56:09 kgube yeah, i still need to fix the build for this
16:56:12 sean-k-mooney we can review and then cidner can complete the rest
16:56:14 bauzas before blindly reapproving
16:56:36 bauzas cool
16:56:49 bauzas I think the dust has settled then
16:57:03 bauzas are we good with wrapping up the meeting then ?
16:58:12 bauzas looks so
16:58:16 bauzas thanks all
16:58:20 bauzas #endmeeting
16:58:20 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jun 4 16:58:20 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:58:20 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-06-04-16.00.html
16:58:20 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-06-04-16.00.txt
16:58:20 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-06-04-16.00.log.html
23:17:56 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Consolidate vTPM and ephemeral encryption secret creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/912094
23:17:57 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add optional 'description' kwarg to create_secret() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/919986
23:17:57 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support create with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870932
23:17:58 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Validate key manager create access in API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/919989
23:17:58 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up unused ephemeral encryption libvirt secrets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/919990
23:17:59 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: "Auto heal" ephemeral encryption secrets on guest launch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/919991
23:17:59 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support (resize|cold migration) with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870933
23:18:00 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support live migration with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905512
23:18:00 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebuild with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870939
23:18:02 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support encrypted source images for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/919992
23:18:02 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to qemu-img rebase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870936
23:18:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add backing_encryption_secret_uuid to BlockDeviceMapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/907960
23:18:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support encrypted backing files for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/907961

Earlier   Later