Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-04-29
15:42:45 samcat116 Oh so those are different things
15:42:49 tkajinam cpu architecture trait for x86_64 would be HW_ARCH_X86_64
15:44:04 tkajinam samcat116, yeah that's different
15:44:25 tkajinam it's ugly that HW_CPU_X86_AESNI is reported in aarh64 node, but we first have to have a mechanism to detect the cpu architecture
15:44:32 tkajinam which is not implemented now
15:44:37 samcat116 Ok, so I guess this is more of a feature request then to automatically set that
15:45:10 samcat116 Yeah I mean I see on startup nova-compute recognizes its aarch64 and tells me its not really tested
15:45:23 samcat116 But from what I've read the support should be pretty decent by now
15:45:37 tkajinam yeah, I agree > more of a feature request
15:45:57 samcat116 am I also correct in understanding that if I manually apply the right arch trait to this node, it will lose all of the automatic traits it has now?
15:48:55 tkajinam iirc if you use `openstack resource provider trait set` to add trait you have to give all traits
15:50:49 tkajinam once additional traits are added, these should be kept.
15:52:00 samcat116 Ok, I'll try that and manually add all of the ones it got automatically
15:52:02 samcat116 thank you!
17:07:42 opendevreview Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/nova master: Fix formatting issues in extra-specs docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917462
17:31:29 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Note the deleyad address view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827856
18:50:40 sean-k-mooney bauzas: fyi i created https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/eventlet-removal-part-1
18:59:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Note the deleyad address view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827856
#openstack-nova - 2024-04-30
09:16:53 opendevreview Michael Still proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose a new API microversion for a spice-direct console. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/915190
09:21:07 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917594
10:06:44 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Update and Re-propose "Allow Manila shares to be directly attached to an instance when using libvirt" for Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/913997
10:15:38 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/917608
10:17:46 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-vif master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917611
10:20:17 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/917613
10:21:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-resource-classes master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/917614
11:30:14 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test case for bug 1978573 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/914653
11:53:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-traits master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/917613
12:13:14 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-vif master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917611
12:44:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/917685
12:48:34 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix KeyError on assisted snapshot call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900783
12:54:34 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test case for bug 1978573 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/914653
12:54:35 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Restore original AZ when unshelve fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/911108
13:52:51 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-vif master: DNM: Run requirement-check jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917707
13:53:33 tkajinam ^^^ sean-k-mooney I think this shows how the requirement-check job fails with the current u-c.txt file which was cleaned up.
13:58:27 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: im not sayign we shoudl not update them
13:58:39 sean-k-mooney im saying that the update you propoes is not correct as it allows know broken version
13:58:50 sean-k-mooney so we either need to fix the requiremetn repo
13:59:03 sean-k-mooney or you need to increase the min version above the blocked version
13:59:44 tkajinam I can bump the min version but I doubt the current list excludes all of known bad versions really
14:00:17 sean-k-mooney sure but allowing know broken version i would consider to be a medium severity bug
14:01:08 sean-k-mooney it would be a high severity bug if pip tied to install a previously blocked version and it cuase dissues
14:01:30 tkajinam I understand that
14:01:51 tkajinam my expectation is that pip would install the "latest" good version so it may not attempt to install such ancient versions
14:02:13 sean-k-mooney sure and my epecation is project do not allow pip to install know bad versions
14:02:23 tkajinam so this is more like a policy decision. I'll leave it for a while in case someone else chime in with a different thought
14:02:34 sean-k-mooney by default it wont but it should not be possibel even if you pass a constratigs file
14:03:01 tkajinam yeah
14:03:02 tkajinam but will update it to bump min unless I get additional feedback
14:04:05 tkajinam Stephen merged patches in a few other nova repos so I can push min bumps as follow-up if we agree with the direction
14:04:33 sean-k-mooney or we revert them
14:04:53 tkajinam we can't revert because requiremet-check job fails on reverts
14:05:09 tkajinam unless we "fix" the upper-constraint file
14:05:31 sean-k-mooney ok well lets fix them quickly then
14:05:39 sean-k-mooney and let not merge any more
14:09:00 sean-k-mooney i think os-traits is the only one where it merged
14:10:24 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-vif master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917611
14:12:34 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Bump min versions to exclude known bad versions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/917713
14:13:06 tkajinam ^^^ this is the only nova repo which gets that change merged
14:13:10 tkajinam I'll update the other open ones
14:14:29 tkajinam maybe I can bring the topic to the meeting today before I update all
14:29:17 sean-k-mooney sure but it likely should also be disucssed with the requirements project
14:29:48 sean-k-mooney im +2 on both by the way
14:37:08 tkajinam let's see how others think. but I hope we can move on with project decisions now and follow up with the global policy discussion, because the job failure may block any change which updates requirements
15:00:55 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917741
15:01:23 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917743
15:01:50 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/917745
15:02:19 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/917747
15:02:48 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/917749
15:27:50 elodilles if any nova core wants easy-win patch reviews then these bot-proposed, generated patches need to merge ASAP ^^^ o:)
15:37:02 gibi on it
15:39:59 gibi I think I hit all of them
15:40:01 elodilles thx o/
15:40:51 gibi thanks for eoling zed :)
15:41:17 gibi I know onlu unmaintained it, but for me that is eol :D
15:43:22 elodilles :D yeah, i remember :)
15:47:45 bauzas cool thanks
15:48:01 bauzas sorry guys, I was working hard on a devstack issue, eventually I'm all done \o/
15:48:35 bauzas fwiw, centos9 has some iptables rule that doesn't accept to forward any IP address :)
15:48:51 bauzas folks, nova meeting now in 12 mins
15:49:05 elodilles no worries, gibi +2+W'd everything ;)
15:49:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917743
15:50:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/917749
16:00:12 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:12 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Apr 30 16:00:12 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:12 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:12 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:27 bauzas hey folks
16:00:31 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:00:34 Uggla_ o/
16:00:37 tkajinam o/
16:00:39 gibi o/
16:00:41 auniyal o/
16:00:41 elodilles o/
16:00:51 fwiesel \o
16:00:57 bauzas cool, let's start
16:01:06 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:01:12 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:01:19 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:01:23 bauzas any bug to report ?
16:01:51 bauzas looks not

Earlier   Later