| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-03-26 | |||
| 16:00:49 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:01:07 | auniyal | o/ | |
| 16:01:13 | bauzas | sorry guys, I don't have the agenda prepared | |
| 16:01:15 | grandchild | o/ | |
| 16:01:17 | bauzas | but let's start | |
| 16:01:42 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:11 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:02:23 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:28 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:33 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:48 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 65 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:53 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:08 | bauzas | I don't know who could be the next baton | |
| 16:03:17 | bauzas | but I don't want to take it | |
| 16:03:52 | bauzas | so, anyone interested ? | |
| 16:04:18 | elodilles | next week i can take it, but not before the 2024.1 Caracal release :/ | |
| 16:04:33 | bauzas | #info bug baton is bauzas | |
| 16:04:39 | bauzas | I'm done, I'll take it | |
| 16:04:45 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:05:17 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:49 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:52 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:05:54 | dansmith | I haven't been following much gate stuff lately | |
| 16:05:58 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:06:01 | dansmith | too many other things in the air | |
| 16:06:02 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:06:22 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:06:35 | Uggla | bauzas, I can take the bug baton | |
| 16:06:44 | bauzas | nevermind, took it | |
| 16:06:59 | bauzas | I really want a short meeting, I need to take a bit of time off | |
| 16:07:06 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:07:10 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:07:14 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html#nova | |
| 16:07:33 | bauzas | #info Caracal GA planned next week | |
| 16:07:44 | bauzas | nothing to relate | |
| 16:07:53 | elodilles | and final rc week is this week | |
| 16:07:57 | bauzas | I've started a new etherpad | |
| 16:08:02 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:08:34 | bauzas | #topic vPTG Planning | |
| 16:08:40 | bauzas | #info The vPTG will be held on Apr 8-12 | |
| 16:08:44 | bauzas | #info Nova sessions between Tues-Fri 1pm-5pm UTC | |
| 16:08:48 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-ptg add your own PTG topics in that etherpad | |
| 16:08:52 | bauzas | #info Don't forget to register yourselves on http://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/ | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | that's it | |
| 16:09:03 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:09:09 | bauzas | like I said, | |
| 16:09:18 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:09:23 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:09:25 | bauzas | elodilles: your turn | |
| 16:09:52 | elodilles | to be short: | |
| 16:10:03 | elodilles | #info stable/202*.* branches' gates seem to be OK, but nova-ceph-multistore is constantly failing (?) on stable/zed | |
| 16:10:10 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:10:14 | elodilles | EOM | |
| 16:10:23 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:10:29 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:10:35 | bauzas | fwiesel seems off | |
| 16:10:38 | grandchild | fwiesel is out this week. there's not much to report. he's waiting on reviews on changes. presumably https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909474 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627. that is all. | |
| 16:10:39 | bauzas | copying his notes | |
| 16:10:49 | bauzas | cool thanks grandchild | |
| 16:11:01 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:11:08 | bauzas | (bauzas) Could https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/aggregatemultitenancyisolation-to-support-unlimited-tenant be a specless blueprint ? | |
| 16:11:15 | bauzas | honestly, I'd like so | |
| 16:11:28 | bauzas | this is a quick small change limited to a filter | |
| 16:11:47 | bauzas | and sahid awaits us to approve his patch for too long | |
| 16:12:23 | bauzas | so, controversial opinions ? | |
| 16:12:31 | bauzas | if not, I'll approve it | |
| 16:12:57 | sean-k-mooney | we discussed all the controverial stuff last cycle | |
| 16:13:06 | sean-k-mooney | so im fine with it being specless this cycle | |
| 16:13:10 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:13:24 | bauzas | #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/aggregatemultitenancyisolation-to-support-unlimited-tenant accepted as a specless blueprint | |
| 16:13:29 | bauzas | I'll do the paperwork | |
| 16:13:42 | bauzas | anything else for open discussion ? | |
| 16:14:32 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:14:34 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:14:38 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:14:38 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Mar 26 16:14:38 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:14:38 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-03-26-16.00.html | |
| 16:14:38 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-03-26-16.00.txt | |
| 16:14:38 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-03-26-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:15:36 | elodilles | thanks bauzas o/ | |
| 16:16:52 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: for the vmware reviwe we proably should try and do a realtime review of those or somethign | |
| 16:17:15 | sean-k-mooney | i have not had time to fully load the context and then look a the ci results to know if the patch fixes what it say it fixes | |
| 16:17:24 | sean-k-mooney | but it woudl be good to adress some of those issues | |
| 19:03:53 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: care to revisit this nova-manage image_property fix? they updated it to address the property value printing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880557 | |
| 19:23:06 | sean-k-mooney | i can take a look i need to recall the context | |
| 19:23:38 | sean-k-mooney | oh i see | |
| 19:26:26 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: wasnt the command orgianly nova-manage property show <vm_uuid> hw_vif_multiqueue_enabled | |
| 19:26:34 | sean-k-mooney | will we break anyoen if we fix this | |
| 19:26:47 | sean-k-mooney | and make it nova-manage image_property show <vm_uuid> hw_vif_multiqueue_enabled | |
| 19:28:43 | sean-k-mooney | i guess the intent was for this to be namespaced under an image_property subparser https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880557/2/nova/cmd/manage.py#3360 | |
| 19:28:45 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: looking ... yeah, you're right, sorry 😑 | |
| 19:28:58 | melwitt | let me update my comment and vote | |
| 19:29:32 | sean-k-mooney | well my really question is can we create a repoducer test of some kind to validate the old/new behavior | |
| 19:29:57 | sean-k-mooney | i might be able to check this on my home cloud quickly | |
| 19:30:11 | melwitt | it would take some doing bc we don't currently test the CLI in that manner that exercises these decorators | |
| 19:31:04 | melwitt | I tried briefly a long time ago when I first reviewed this and didn't come up with a good way (and i don't remember what I tried now) | |
| 19:31:57 | sean-k-mooney | so i tought someone submited a docs fix related to this recently | |
| 19:32:39 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: ok so this isn't changing the subcommand, just the name of the arg. so I don't think it would break anyone? | |
| 19:33:10 | sean-k-mooney | if its just the name of the arg in python then no | |
| 19:33:20 | sean-k-mooney | so really i need to try and test this locally to review it | |