| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-02-20 | |||
| 16:08:07 | bauzas | #info Caracal-3 (and feature freeze) milestone in 1 week | |
| 16:08:13 | bauzas | yeah, next Thursday | |
| 16:08:23 | bauzas | tick-tock again | |
| 16:08:31 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:08:35 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status | |
| 16:08:41 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:08:47 | bauzas | elodilles: anything you want to discuss ? | |
| 16:09:16 | elodilles | #info stable/2023.* gates don't seem blocked (though non-voting grenade-skip-level is broken, probably due to stable -> unmaintained yoga branch) | |
| 16:09:30 | elodilles | * for 2023.1 | |
| 16:09:37 | elodilles | #info stable/zed gate is broken, as nova-grenade-multinode started failing (probably due to stable -> unmaintained yoga branch) | |
| 16:09:54 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:10:09 | elodilles | i'm investigating this, but might be easier to set nova-grenade-multinode non-voting for now | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | I don't have time for looking at it unfortunately | |
| 16:10:22 | bauzas | but yeah | |
| 16:10:25 | elodilles | until i figure out where to patch the job ;) | |
| 16:10:47 | elodilles | so that gate will be unblocked | |
| 16:10:51 | elodilles | opinions? | |
| 16:12:24 | elodilles | anyway, we can track things here: | |
| 16:12:27 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:13:34 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 16:13:54 | elodilles | (i know the timing isn't best: one week before Feature Freeze...) | |
| 16:15:47 | elodilles | (and that's all from me) | |
| 16:15:49 | bauzas | ok, can we move to the next topic ? | |
| 16:15:51 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: is it possibel teh failure is a real upgrade issue | |
| 16:15:52 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:16:06 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:16:10 | bauzas | fwiesel: anything to tell ? | |
| 16:16:13 | fwiesel | #info Possible solution to bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2053027) proposed. | |
| 16:16:33 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: could be, though i'd give it really low probability o:) | |
| 16:16:38 | fwiesel | So, after a long time I found the culprit... Now I just have to find an acceptable solution. | |
| 16:16:56 | fwiesel | #info Regression in the CI setup (FIPs not working outside of routers network namespace). | |
| 16:17:16 | fwiesel | I hope, I can work that out quickly. | |
| 16:17:25 | fwiesel | #info Proposed with regression above leaves us with a tempest result of (Passed: 435, Failed: 41, Skipped: 42) | |
| 16:17:42 | fwiesel | So, still progress. Down from 200-something failures. | |
| 16:18:04 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 16:18:12 | fwiesel | There are also some tests still in, which need to get blacklisted, like the iSCSI attachment tests. But first, FIPs. | |
| 16:18:22 | fwiesel | Questions? | |
| 16:18:27 | bauzas | none from me | |
| 16:18:30 | bauzas | anyone else ? | |
| 16:18:55 | fwiesel | How does it look then with the feature freeze and the vmware driver? | |
| 16:19:21 | bauzas | feature freeze is only for blueprints | |
| 16:19:35 | bauzas | if you have bugfixes, we can merge them until RC1 | |
| 16:19:36 | fwiesel | Ah great... that gives us a bit more time. | |
| 16:20:00 | bauzas | fwiesel: you probably don't know, but at RC1, we git branch from master | |
| 16:20:39 | bauzas | so, then after RC1 tag, the master branch is then related to Dalmatian | |
| 16:20:58 | bauzas | every change we merge after RC1 is then a Dalmatian one | |
| 16:21:44 | bauzas | if we want to fix Caracal before GA, then we need to fix the bug in master (Dalmatian) and then backport it to the Caracal stable branch... but only if this is a regression from that release | |
| 16:22:06 | fwiesel | And if it is a regression from yoga? :) | |
| 16:22:16 | fwiesel | I mean xena. | |
| 16:22:32 | bauzas | so say you add a fix, we could merge it before or after RC1, but we wouldn't be able to backport it to Caracal and Bobcat only after Caracal GA | |
| 16:22:49 | bauzas | (that's just a 2-week time) | |
| 16:22:56 | bauzas | (3 weeks actually) | |
| 16:22:59 | fwiesel | I see. I'll keep that in mind. I don't think we are in that a hurry. | |
| 16:23:29 | bauzas | fwiesel: fwiw, you could only backport the fix down to Zed | |
| 16:23:50 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/ | |
| 16:24:02 | fwiesel | Fine by me. We are targeting bobcat as the next release. | |
| 16:24:09 | fwiesel | (Internally) | |
| 16:24:32 | bauzas | elodilles: do you know when eventually all the EM branches will become Umaintained ? | |
| 16:24:53 | elodilles | in the coming weeks i'll propose transition branches for them | |
| 16:25:08 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:25:25 | fwiesel | Well, that's from my side then. | |
| 16:25:26 | elodilles | since Yoga became EOM in the past days officially | |
| 16:26:15 | bauzas | yeah, it would look bizarre to backport to Zed and then punt Yoga by directly backporting to Xena | |
| 16:26:23 | elodilles | (and Zed will transition from May 2nd, 2024) | |
| 16:26:49 | bauzas | ok, anyway I think we're done | |
| 16:26:58 | bauzas | elodilles: thanks for replying | |
| 16:27:02 | bauzas | and thanks fwiesel | |
| 16:27:13 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:27:22 | bauzas | nothing in the agenda, anything anyone ? | |
| 16:28:03 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:28:08 | bauzas | thanks all folks | |
| 16:28:12 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:28:12 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Feb 20 16:28:12 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:28:12 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-02-20-16.00.html | |
| 16:28:12 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-02-20-16.00.txt | |
| 16:28:12 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-02-20-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:28:14 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:28:18 | fwiesel | Thanks | |
| 16:29:14 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: add a periodic check for migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909598 | |
| 16:33:16 | fwiesel | For the curious ones: Here is the tempest run of the proposed fix: http://openstack-ci-logs.global.cloud.sap/openstack/nova/1858cf18b940b3636e54eb5aafaf4050bdd02939/tempest.html | |
| 16:39:11 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney: oh ok cool, is it possible that nova-next is broken in zed because of some default that isnt supported? | |
| 16:40:02 | sean-k-mooney | mnaser: it should not be unless someoen regressed it in a diffent repo | |
| 16:40:32 | sean-k-mooney | mnaser: what patch is it failing on | |
| 16:41:15 | mnaser | both https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909541 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909098 | |
| 16:41:22 | sean-k-mooney | mnaser: i generally assume its an issue with the patch being backported until proven otherwise | |
| 16:41:22 | mnaser | (the same series i've been backporting for a few days now) | |
| 16:41:46 | mnaser | yeah.. i mean these patches are pretty trivial in that they just simply remove a flag from libvirt (and worked till 2023.1) | |
| 16:41:58 | mnaser | but yes i agree with you :) | |
| 16:42:02 | sean-k-mooney | so this looks liek a tempet config issue | |
| 16:42:10 | sean-k-mooney | it may be a tempet regression | |
| 16:42:16 | sean-k-mooney | Details: {'code': 409, 'message': 'Multiple possible networks found, use a Network ID to be more specific.'} | |
| 16:43:25 | mnaser | hmm | |
| 16:43:36 | mnaser | so something else needs to be backported? | |
| 16:44:15 | sean-k-mooney | i would assume so yes | |
| 16:44:32 | sean-k-mooney | im in another call in a primiarly listien role right now | |
| 16:44:38 | sean-k-mooney | so im slowlow lookign at this | |
| 16:44:38 | mnaser | ah no worries | |
| 16:50:32 | sean-k-mooney | looking at the master defintion im not seeing anythign related to the multiple netowrks | |
| 16:50:43 | sean-k-mooney | and im also not seeign any hcange to that test in tempest either | |
| 16:50:49 | sean-k-mooney | at least not recently | |