| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-01-30 | |||
| 16:04:41 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:04:49 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:04:55 | bauzas | nothing urgent to raise ? | |
| 16:05:07 | Uggla | */ | |
| 16:05:08 | auniyal | I had 2 bugs if some one can look into | |
| 16:05:18 | auniyal | but as we do not discuss bug here | |
| 16:05:45 | auniyal | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2045785 | |
| 16:06:10 | auniyal | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2049121 - in this you have already comented once | |
| 16:06:38 | auniyal | thats all | |
| 16:07:49 | bauzas | I'll add another comment about the last bug | |
| 16:08:10 | bauzas | he needs to explain more why he thinks this is nova related | |
| 16:08:26 | bauzas | we just passthru the whole PCI device | |
| 16:08:31 | auniyal | yes | |
| 16:08:48 | bauzas | anyway moving on | |
| 16:08:57 | bauzas | thanks auniyal | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:09:02 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:09:06 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:09:11 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:09:24 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:42 | bauzas | the gate is more flakey those days | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | I've seen it | |
| 16:09:55 | bauzas | still the same usual suspects | |
| 16:10:15 | bauzas | haven't seen a lot of kernel panics tho | |
| 16:11:04 | bauzas | anyone wanting to discuss our lovely gate problems ? | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:12:31 | bauzas | rechecks are back, but as a reminder, please don't say only "recheck", just add the reason you think why it failed | |
| 16:12:41 | bauzas | it will help | |
| 16:12:44 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:12:50 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:13:10 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html#nova | |
| 16:13:14 | bauzas | #info Caracal-3 (and feature freeze) milestone in 4 weeks | |
| 16:13:19 | bauzas | tick-tock | |
| 16:13:53 | bauzas | (as a reminder, we'll also have non-client libraries freeze by the week before, ie. 3 weeks by now | |
| 16:14:07 | bauzas | so if you need to update os-vif, time to think about it | |
| 16:14:54 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:14:56 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:15:10 | bauzas | maybe you lived in a cave from the last 2 months | |
| 16:15:19 | bauzas | so it would explain why you don't know yet about it but, | |
| 16:15:21 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status | |
| 16:15:32 | bauzas | is existing and you definitely look at it :) | |
| 16:15:49 | bauzas | gibi: thanks gibi for having added your topics | |
| 16:16:22 | gibi | we need to resolve some of those questions to land the manila series | |
| 16:16:30 | bauzas | the more we add our points, the better it will be a readable and digestable context for others | |
| 16:16:52 | bauzas | I know, I just took an example of something someone may add | |
| 16:17:01 | bauzas | to give visibility for others | |
| 16:18:44 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:18:47 | bauzas | elodilles: around ? | |
| 16:18:49 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:18:53 | elodilles | i'll be short | |
| 16:18:59 | elodilles | with a quick glance a saw that: | |
| 16:19:03 | elodilles | #info stable gates don't seem blocked | |
| 16:19:12 | elodilles | and that's all for now from me :) | |
| 16:19:23 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:20:52 | bauzas | ok, next topic then ? | |
| 16:21:06 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:21:13 | bauzas | fwiesel: floor is yours | |
| 16:21:22 | fwiesel | #info Administrative: Account added to Third Party CI mail filter list. | |
| 16:21:39 | fwiesel | Nothing interesting. Shout out to frickler who took care of it. | |
| 16:21:47 | fwiesel | #info Log-shipping: Generate static index for log retrieval. Struggling to get AWS access permissions right to ship things. | |
| 16:22:12 | fwiesel | Not much of progress here, as I do not have access to AWS myself and have to poke people. Sorry about that. | |
| 16:22:25 | fwiesel | That's it from my side. | |
| 16:22:27 | bauzas | no worries | |
| 16:22:42 | bauzas | 9 people don't do babies in 1 month | |
| 16:22:59 | bauzas | ditto indeed | |
| 16:23:22 | fwiesel | All that is left is just wiring it up. It may take just a day, if everything is in place. | |
| 16:23:38 | bauzas | let's then wait | |
| 16:23:44 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:23:49 | fwiesel | You're welcome. | |
| 16:23:53 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:24:02 | bauzas | we have one topic | |
| 16:24:04 | bauzas | (NotTheEvilOne) Support for "Bring your own keys" to `Volume.Create()` | |
| 16:24:11 | bauzas | NotTheEvilOne: around ? | |
| 16:24:14 | NotTheEvilOne | yes | |
| 16:25:37 | NotTheEvilOne | Hi everyone. I would like to basically learn if the idea and intentions are the right way to go and what you may suggest. We (Sovereign Cloud Stack) https://scs.community would like to bring the feature "bring you own keys" for encryption to OpenStack, | |
| 16:26:03 | NotTheEvilOne | #link https://github.com/SovereignCloudStack/issues/issues/519 | |
| 16:26:20 | NotTheEvilOne | For that reason I added a bug to launchpad | |
| 16:26:31 | dansmith | probably best to write up a spec for how you plan to do that, what the workflow and use-cases are so we can review in that format | |
| 16:26:33 | NotTheEvilOne | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2051108 | |
| 16:27:20 | NotTheEvilOne | Should I add that to the ticket? We already had a basic idea. | |
| 16:27:22 | NotTheEvilOne | #link https://input.scs.community/9FbrLgYbT8KFvZGXLzay6Q?view#Go-implementation | |
| 16:27:46 | dansmith | that bug is against nova but says cinder lacks the current API to do it, so it's not clear what nova would need here, and we also need to know if/that cinder has an approved design for their side | |
| 16:28:19 | bauzas | NotTheEvilOne: we'll have a PTG in April | |
| 16:28:23 | dansmith | NotTheEvilOne: that doc of yours also seems to imply only cinder changes | |
| 16:28:29 | bauzas | which is one week after the Caracal release | |
| 16:29:00 | bauzas | given we're currently on new features approval freeze, we can't even accept your request for this cycle | |
| 16:29:07 | NotTheEvilOne | I guess that only some changes are needed to Cinder indeed as most building blocks are already there | |
| 16:29:18 | NotTheEvilOne | I see. | |
| 16:29:20 | bauzas | so I'd strongly suggest you to attend next PTG in April and join the Cinder community at that time | |
| 16:29:24 | dansmith | NotTheEvilOne: okay then you're in the wrong channel/meeting :) | |
| 16:29:58 | bauzas | if something is needed from the nova side when discussing w/ the Cinder folks, then surely we could join that session | |
| 16:30:04 | dansmith | yep | |
| 16:30:16 | NotTheEvilOne | Is it possible to move the bug to the correct category? | |
| 16:30:18 | NotTheEvilOne | ok | |
| 16:30:32 | bauzas | NotTheEvilOne: https://openinfra.dev/ptg/ | |
| 16:30:58 | bauzas | NotTheEvilOne: I can point you to the right Cinder folks to bug | |
| 16:31:06 | bauzas | in order to make sure your topic is discussed at the PTG | |
| 16:31:17 | NotTheEvilOne | Would be great, thanks | |
| 16:32:46 | bauzas | NotTheEvilOne: will give you the nicks after the meeting | |
| 16:32:53 | bauzas | stay online for a sec | |