Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-12-04
13:58:31 sean-k-mooney i was previously fine with it
13:58:44 dvo-plv great, thanks
14:04:12 LarsErikP is there any SRU planned to include this in zed? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882914
14:04:39 sean-k-mooney this is not thr correct place to ask that
14:04:52 LarsErikP ok. where should I ask? =)
14:05:15 sean-k-mooney that a question for cannoical we do not generally discuss that in this irc channel
14:05:25 LarsErikP ok
14:06:17 sean-k-mooney assumign they have a similar import process form upstream as redhat it will probaly get pulled into a future update
14:06:25 LarsErikP Another related question.. It seems like there is no tagged version of nova in zed which includes that fix. But - it is tagged and released for Yoga.. Which means that whne you upgrade from yoga to zed, the bug is reintroduced..
14:06:49 LarsErikP is that something that kan be adressed here? :P
14:07:05 sean-k-mooney yep we just did a yoga release as awe are moving it to unmaintaiend
14:07:16 sean-k-mooney we normally do a release of all the new branches first
14:07:32 sean-k-mooney i assuem the patch just has not been approved in the release repo yet
14:08:24 sean-k-mooney LarsErikP: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/899604
14:08:51 LarsErikP aha
14:08:57 LarsErikP so. it is on its way
14:09:42 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ^ you mentioned you had a concern with the bobcat one in october but not waht it was
14:09:59 sean-k-mooney LarsErikP: we can bring this up in the team meeting tomorrow
14:10:03 sean-k-mooney and see fi we can unblock this
14:10:07 LarsErikP thanks!
14:10:27 LarsErikP We were hoping to upgrade from yoga to zed before christmas, but that.. may not happen now :P
14:10:28 bauzas sean-k-mooney: we need to land the RPC 6.x backport fix in Zed
14:10:32 sean-k-mooney the bobcat release now has the +1 form bauzas 899602
14:10:44 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ah ok
14:11:03 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899375
14:11:21 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900341 that one
14:11:45 sean-k-mooney greade failed for soem reason
14:11:53 sean-k-mooney im quickly going to see why and or recheck
14:12:23 sean-k-mooney weried it failsed on a vnc console issue
14:13:02 bauzas yeah it's a known issue
14:13:16 sean-k-mooney a know issue that is now fixed?
14:13:26 sean-k-mooney or just a random failure
14:13:28 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/900257
14:13:53 bauzas this is the vnc fix ^
14:14:08 bauzas we landed it in master but bobcat and antelope have the problem
14:14:23 sean-k-mooney ok i see so we need to land that before we can land the nova stabel branch change
14:14:28 bauzas in my series, I only change the CI job in the last patch
14:14:37 bauzas so we can merge the fixes
14:14:43 sean-k-mooney ack
14:14:43 bauzas and we can release
14:15:06 bauzas we can even -1 the grenade changes if we want for stable branches
14:15:12 bauzas those are not really needed
14:15:22 bauzas this is just for closing a coverage gap we had
14:15:29 bauzas (and why rebuild was broken)
14:15:33 sean-k-mooney ok cool so you approvced the zed code fix
14:15:44 sean-k-mooney so we just need to wait for that to merge then update the sha
14:15:47 bauzas yup
14:15:50 sean-k-mooney and LarsErikP then we can do the release
14:16:22 LarsErikP great!
14:16:28 bauzas sean-k-mooney: if you want a fun puzzle, you'll like that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902084/comments/4e8056fe_b4b6a789
14:16:46 LarsErikP and then I have to wait for canonical and the SRU of course.. fun times :P
14:18:11 sean-k-mooney LarsErikP well they can do release of patches without use doign the release
14:18:24 sean-k-mooney so they may do an async/hotfix for you if your one of there customers
14:18:29 LarsErikP they can.. but will they? :P
14:18:35 LarsErikP I'm not paying :P
14:18:46 sean-k-mooney heheh then proably not
14:18:53 sean-k-mooney hopefully this will get resovled this week
14:18:55 LarsErikP *sad trumpet noises*
14:19:12 sean-k-mooney if it does not keep letting us knwo until we get it done
14:19:39 LarsErikP will do =)
14:20:27 LarsErikP thanks for all the help! We found it a bit.. surprising that the bug was reintroduced when we did the upgrade.. :P
14:21:33 obrest Luckily we have a dedicated production-environment! So that we can fail safely in test :P
14:40:01 sean-k-mooney LarsErikP: normally the yoga release sould not have happend until after all the rest
14:40:28 sean-k-mooney its movign from stable/yoga to unmaintained/yoga and that was really ment ot have happend back in septemeber
14:40:46 LarsErikP aha..
14:41:10 sean-k-mooney well octopber i guess it was ment to have happend after the 2023.2 release was officlaly made
14:55:29 bauzas sean-k-mooney: do you think we should have a minor release (.y) for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/899603 ? (due to the hyverv experimental backport)
15:00:10 sean-k-mooney we could i guess
15:00:17 sean-k-mooney im not sure its required but we can
15:01:03 sean-k-mooney it does not actully disable the driver or anythign it just adds the warnign on start up
15:01:29 sean-k-mooney if we took the neutron approch of not loadign experimntal drivers without an explict opt in it woudl be another matter
15:04:06 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I added a comment so the release folks will tell us whether we need it
15:04:15 sean-k-mooney cool
15:32:45 gibi sean-k-mooney: could you check the two backports of power management fixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901567 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901660/2 (both has +2 from elodilles already)
15:57:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix traits to cpu flags mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
17:14:23 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: add a regression test for all compute RPCAPI 6.x pinnings for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900307
17:14:24 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Fix rebuild compute RPC API exception for rolling-upgrades https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900341
17:14:25 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Adding server actions tests to grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900342
17:18:29 elodilles bauzas: sorry, i did not realize that the functional test failure was valid, please review the updated test & that my thinking is correct ^^^
23:14:08 JayF bauzas: for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/659691 and other patches related to the SDK migration for ironic<>nova driver, is there a place you'd like me to link these, or some way you'd like me to tag them, once Ironic cores are happy w/em?
23:14:53 JayF bauzas: we're trying hard to land as many of these cleanups as possible before sharding this time :D
23:23:14 JayF stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867799 (and the chain) needs a rebase; I was going to review, get this tested in Ironic CI, and try to help land this -- do you want to rebase this or would you like me to?
#openstack-nova - 2023-12-05
03:37:48 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
07:25:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
08:47:42 sean-k-mooney[m] gibi: melwitt can either of ye take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883682
08:48:22 sean-k-mooney[m] its too late to pull that into our next downstream release but it would still be nice to get that fixed before the end of the year if we can
08:50:04 sean-k-mooney[m] melwitt: oh i see you have some comments since i last reviewd ill read over them now
09:03:30 sean-k-mooney[m] ok dropped back to +1 based on your comments
09:45:36 sean-k-mooney[m] bauzas: can you review this functional repoducer test quickly. gibi and i are +2 on the actual fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891290/1 gibi helped write the repoducer so we need another core to review
10:11:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Do not manage CPU0's state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901567
10:31:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Allow enabling cpu_power_management with 0 dedicated CPUs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901660
10:36:37 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sorry I was off due to some issue with my car, I'm back now
10:40:16 stephenfin JayF: If it's okay, I'd rather someone else take that. I think it's reasonably complete
10:45:46 sean-k-mooney bauzas: no worries
10:46:37 bauzas I needed to go to the policy just because the folk that hitted my car with his skis wasn't replied to me :(
10:46:49 bauzas replying*
10:47:01 bauzas police*
10:58:08 bauzas shit, I need to remember how to run a specific stestr worker
11:01:04 bauzas yeah found $ stestr last --subunit | subunit-filter -s --xfail --with-tag=worker-3 | subunit-ls > slave-3.list
11:09:58 bauzas hah

Earlier   Later