Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-23
09:33:12 opendevreview Haidong Pang proposed openstack/nova master: Corrected allocation deletion error during live migration. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901721
10:36:30 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: i approved the patch gibi thanks for reviewing
10:38:22 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: specifically https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899381 thanks for paying donw that technial debt
11:52:30 dvo-plv sean-k-mooney, gibi Do you have a time today to review this proposal ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/895924
11:52:35 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
12:18:36 sean-k-mooney i readded my +2 to the spec
12:18:44 dvo-plv thanks
12:18:51 sean-k-mooney im not sure ill have time to review the code today but ill see how my day goes
12:19:19 sean-k-mooney if i dont get to it today feel free to ping me on monday (im on pto tomorrow)
12:19:47 sean-k-mooney i was largely happy with the implemation before so if you have adress gibis previous comments in the nova patch
12:20:10 sean-k-mooney then its likely that nova patch is more or less ready to merge unless we see anything else on this revions
12:22:22 dvo-plv sure, thanks
17:01:37 auniyal6 Hi dansmith, just a reminderto review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865336
17:03:22 auniyal6 you said earlier "will chat with sean-k-mooney about it when he's back before I review/approve"
17:04:05 auniyal6 this only walaby is pending https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/1970467%22
18:13:27 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Detect maximum number of SEV guests automatically https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899381
18:21:35 sean-k-mooney artom: Uggla_ if you get around to revisiting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/877773 i left a -1 and some chagnes that would be required fro that to be backporable.
18:31:21 artom sean-k-mooney, you're insane :)
18:31:29 artom I mean that in the best way possible
18:32:45 artom At least you wrapped it in a @property
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-24
04:17:26 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add upgrade status check for duplicate cell names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901810
04:50:31 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Handle InstanceExists exception for duplicate instance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860938
08:00:41 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add retry on attachment_update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901815
08:04:44 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add retry on attachment_update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901815
08:10:49 opendevreview Haidong Pang proposed openstack/nova master: Catch MessagingTimeout during evacuation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901817
10:01:14 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: enforce remote sonsole shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901824
10:22:46 bauzas gibi: thanks for having commented https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899625
10:22:58 bauzas good point, I haven't verified about providing *,*
13:44:53 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: got a sec for discussing about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899625/ ?
13:46:44 bauzas if not, no worries
13:46:51 bauzas lemme explain what I'll do
13:48:28 bauzas first, I'll work on pas-ha[m] patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899406 for having it as a dependency for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899625/
13:49:10 bauzas secondly, I'll split my own patch in two, one for let's make device_addresses to be None
13:49:24 bauzas (instead of a wildcard)
13:49:42 bauzas and then, the third change will be https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899625/ without the wildcard
13:49:48 bauzas pas-ha[m]: are you around?
14:12:14 bauzas pas-ha[m]: fwiw, I'm gonna add a few UTs
14:12:18 bauzas to your patch
14:18:49 pas-ha[m] bauzas: hi, sure
14:20:12 bauzas on it already, shall be quick hopefully
14:20:30 bauzas I feel sad, I just saw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858012
14:21:05 bauzas people discovered the bug with SRIOV VFs like one year ago, but due to a difficult bug report and no way to reproduce it, I skipped it
14:44:10 gibi bauzas: sean-k-mooney is out today
14:46:09 bauzas ack
14:46:55 bauzas my point is that I want to split the fact that we modify the option from the other bugfix, which is how to not use the other inventories
14:47:07 gibi make sense
14:48:20 bauzas and then we could discuss whether we prefer to have a wildcard or just not using device_addresses
14:48:35 bauzas IMHO, after thinking about it, I prefer the latter
14:49:01 gibi not using device_addresses simplifies the config parsing
14:49:26 gibi it make the meaning of the config a bit less obvious
14:49:35 gibi but we can document that
14:50:21 gibi is the reason of wildcarding to make the number of inventories dynamic?
14:51:05 bauzas no, just because it would be large to provide all of the VFs for example with a L2
14:51:10 bauzas which has 32 of them :)
14:51:43 gibi ahh
14:51:45 bauzas this is simplier to say 'let's just let nova to find the needed VFs'
14:52:45 gibi but it has a side effect that if the number of VF changes nova will dynamically pick up the change
14:54:05 bauzas well
14:54:13 bauzas it's the same if they change the GPU
14:54:37 bauzas the VFs shouldn't change unless the GPU is changed
14:54:54 bauzas and fwiw, for that, the operator needs to first to either delete or shelve the instances
14:55:04 bauzas because of the allocations
14:55:05 gibi OK so the number of VFs is constant for a given pGPU
14:55:12 bauzas yeah
14:55:15 gibi cool
14:55:16 bauzas this isn't changing
15:03:44 auniyal6 I saw VMware NSX CI job running first time, but logs link is not accessible
15:04:10 auniyal6 or job link
15:04:59 auniyal6 http://p3-ci-int.eng.vmware.com:8080/job/ext-nova-zuul/42056/
15:15:56 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Use configuration for single enabled mdev type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899406
15:15:56 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP : libvirt: Cap with max_instances GPU types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899625
15:16:14 bauzas pas-ha[m]: added UTs, your patch sounds good to me
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-27
18:10:13 melwitt 787496
18:10:18 melwitt argh
20:07:52 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Translate VF network capabilities to port binding https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899225
21:28:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Do not manage CPU0's state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901566
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-28
09:45:39 sahid o/
11:22:41 dvo-plv Hello sean-k-mooney gibi Could you please review this spec and code
11:22:47 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/895924
11:22:53 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
14:29:37 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Cap with max_instances GPU types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899625
14:29:38 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902084
15:48:57 bauzas reminder : nova meeting in 12 mins
15:49:05 bauzas *here
16:00:54 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:54 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Nov 28 16:00:54 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:54 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:54 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:59 elodilles o/
16:01:02 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:06 bauzas who's around ?
16:01:10 fwiesel \o
16:02:42 auniyal6 o/
16:03:06 Uggla o/
16:03:40 bauzas okay let's start
16:03:48 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:53 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:03:56 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 38 new untriaged bugs (+1 since the last meeting)
16:04:06 bauzas I've triaged two simple bugs
16:04:23 bauzas maybe gmann could look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2044035

Earlier   Later