Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-07
15:15:58 bauzas dvo-plv: just my guess, was that spec originally proposed in Antelope ?
15:16:30 bauzas if so, the libvirt check would sound more important to me by that time
15:16:51 bauzas but the fact is, we bumped our mins in Bobcat, so that simplifies the logic :)
15:17:42 dvo-plv i'm not familiar with release date, I thought that it was before Zed release May 03 2023 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377
15:18:56 bauzas I need to disappear for 20 mins, but I can read
15:28:14 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: add a regression test for all compute RPCAPI 6.x pinnings for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900306
15:28:31 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: add a regression test for all compute RPCAPI 6.x pinnings for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900307
15:29:27 dvo-plv sean-k-mooney, gibi
15:29:30 dvo-plv So, in a conclusion we have two open questions. How we need to proceed with scheduling, trait or release filter
15:29:46 dvo-plv Does tempest test is a required from us ?
15:47:35 bauzas noonedeadpunk: thanks for proposing the backparts, hadn't time yet
15:47:50 bauzas reminder: nova meeting in 13 mins here.
15:47:58 noonedeadpunk no worries. I will push rest on top in couple of mins
15:48:27 bauzas dvo-plv: I'm not saying a tempest test is mandatory, just a preference
15:48:34 bauzas that said, at least a functional test seems needed
16:02:09 bauzas shit, forgot the meeting was in another impromptu call :(
16:02:11 bauzas #startmeeting
16:02:11 opendevmeet bauzas: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee'
16:02:11 elodilles o/
16:02:15 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:02:15 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Nov 7 16:02:15 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:02:15 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:02:15 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:02:22 elodilles o/
16:02:30 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:02:45 bauzas (this will be live, I haven't updated the wiki yet)
16:03:08 dansmith o/
16:03:43 gibi o/
16:04:44 bauzas there, let's start
16:04:48 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:04:53 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:04:58 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 32 new untriaged bugs (-4 since the last meeting)
16:05:02 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:05:12 bauzas Uggla_: any bug you wanted to tell us ?
16:05:52 bauzas anyway, let's move on
16:06:09 bauzas elodilles: fancy taking the baton ?
16:06:44 elodilles bauzas: yepp
16:06:54 elodilles i can take it :)
16:06:55 bauzas cool thanks
16:07:08 bauzas #info bug baton is elodilles
16:07:15 bauzas elodilles: ++
16:08:12 Uggla_ oh
16:08:16 Uggla_ yes
16:08:23 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:08:28 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:08:33 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:08:43 Uggla_ https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2039381
16:08:47 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:09:13 bauzas Uggla_: oh sorry we moved to the gate section, can we discuss your bug in the open discussion then ?
16:09:46 dansmith melwitt has a fix up for the vnc ting.. I've asked her a question, but assume we'll get that on the way soon once she's around
16:09:58 bauzas fwiw, all periodics are in green
16:10:04 Uggla_ yep sure
16:10:08 bauzas dansmith: oh, nice to hear, any change I could dent ?
16:10:41 dansmith sec
16:11:17 dansmith https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/900257
16:11:50 bauzas dansmith: cool, CCing it
16:12:18 bauzas oh that's why it's failing intermittently
16:12:25 bauzas depending on the host you land
16:12:53 bauzas I nacked the idea when gibi suggested it because I was too lazy to look at the job and I just trusted the fact we got green runs
16:12:56 bauzas what a shame
16:13:04 dansmith bauzas: that's what I'm wondering
16:13:19 dansmith seems like we should be failing a lot more though,
16:13:34 dansmith and why this has become a thing all of a sudden also seems weird if it's been broken like this for a while
16:13:43 dansmith but otherwise yeah, hopefully an easy fix
16:13:56 bauzas because yesterday we merged my patch that added the servers actions checks in grenade
16:14:18 bauzas this test was flakey but never run, and I just opened the can of worms
16:14:33 dansmith but I think it has failed on other patches, not just yours
16:15:03 bauzas well, then the vnc check itself could be present on other tempest tests
16:15:20 bauzas or we could run the server actions list in other jobs, rather
16:15:22 bauzas anyway
16:16:01 bauzas moving on
16:16:49 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:16:54 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html
16:16:58 bauzas #info Nova deadlines will be proposed in the schedule above
16:17:12 bauzas I just need to file a release patch with the correct dates :)
16:17:21 bauzas #info Caracal-1 milestone in 1 week
16:17:30 bauzas #info Spec review day today
16:17:56 bauzas I think I made a correct round of reviews but there are still some specs I haven't looked yet
16:18:09 bauzas I'll continue my duty until EOB
16:18:47 dansmith any list of specs just waiting for a +W?
16:19:02 bauzas sure
16:19:19 opendevreview Steven Relf proposed openstack/nova master: Adding basic auth to dynamic vendordata api calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900252
16:19:21 gibi there is a set of reproposals that are easy wins
16:19:30 bauzas dansmith: you mean a second +2 or just a plain +W ? :)
16:19:46 dansmith bauzas: second review I mean?
16:19:48 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/nova-specs)+status:open+NOT+owner:self+NOT+label:Workflow%253C%253D-1+label:Verified%253E%253D1%252Czuul+NOT+reviewedby:self+is:mergeable+NOT+label:Code-Review%253C%253D-1%252Cnova-core+label:Code-Review%253E%253D2
16:19:59 bauzas not sure the link will render correctly
16:20:11 bauzas but tl;dr: dansmith you have the sole spec that needs a second +2 :)
16:20:37 bauzas and yeah, there are reproposals on the way
16:20:44 bauzas btw. I wonder why they don't show up
16:21:09 dansmith bauzas: ah bummer.. maybe gibi can circle back on that .. that's the only one I can't finish :)
16:21:14 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open+label:Code-Review%253E%253D2
16:21:31 dansmith but yeah I'll look at the re-proposals
16:21:38 bauzas sorry, my dash link seems to be wrong
16:21:59 bauzas fwiw, had no time yet to correctly write a mdev live-migration spec
16:22:01 auniyal6 on CI bugs, nova-emulation job is failing too (I wanted to check if its failing for more patches, but builds page is not opening for me right now )
16:22:04 bauzas I'll bug folks directly :)
16:22:04 sean-k-mooney i can also try and loop back
16:22:09 sean-k-mooney ill be doing more review later today
16:22:21 sean-k-mooney dansmith: on your spec

Earlier   Later