| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-06 | |||
| 13:43:07 | bauzas | dansmith: okidoki, so I'll add a comment and review it again | |
| 13:43:37 | dansmith | bauzas: well, I just want to close the loop so it doesn't look like it's waiting for a change :) | |
| 13:45:06 | bauzas | dansmith: correct, hence my new comment needed :) | |
| 13:45:23 | bauzas | you explained me that it would only be for attach/detach calls | |
| 13:45:30 | bauzas | that mdevs don't do | |
| 13:45:47 | bauzas | that said I said I should look at other devices, if we do this | |
| 13:45:59 | bauzas | but I think I found none of them | |
| 13:46:04 | dansmith | yep, cool :) | |
| 14:12:26 | dansmith | bauzas: thanks for that | |
| 14:13:05 | gibi | dansmith: thanks I will take a look | |
| 14:13:11 | dansmith | gibi: thanks | |
| 14:24:18 | sahid | bauzas: sure I will do | |
| 17:23:58 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add initial healthcheck support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825015 | |
| 17:23:58 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add healthcheck manager to manager base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827844 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-09 | |||
| 08:40:08 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: AggregateMultitenancyIsolation to support unlimited tenant https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896512 | |
| 08:40:24 | sahid | o? | |
| 08:40:26 | sahid | o/ | |
| 08:40:33 | sahid | bauzas: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/aggregatemultitenancyisolation-to-support-unlimited-tenant the bp related :-) | |
| 08:40:46 | bauzas | cool | |
| 08:41:05 | bauzas | sahid: are you able to join tomorrow's nova meeting at 6pm our time ? | |
| 08:43:20 | sahid | bauzas: 6pm our time, probably no but I will try :/ | |
| 08:43:39 | bauzas | yeah, it's unfortunately late | |
| 08:43:50 | bauzas | in one month, it will be at 5pm | |
| 08:43:55 | bauzas | 1600UTC :) | |
| 08:44:10 | sahid | yes and the mardi is not good time for me | |
| 08:44:19 | sahid | yes that will be better :-) | |
| 08:44:26 | bauzas | so if you want, I can ask if people are okay with this blueprint to be a specless one | |
| 08:44:49 | bauzas | and I'll tell you on wed | |
| 08:44:52 | sahid | bauzas: yes please do and let me know, if needed I can certainly write one | |
| 08:45:04 | bauzas | col | |
| 08:45:07 | sahid | thanks a lot | |
| 08:45:08 | bauzas | cool even | |
| 08:45:19 | bauzas | np, hth | |
| 08:51:28 | bauzas | sahid: oh, you would want to backport the filter change upstream ? | |
| 08:52:04 | bauzas | sahid: if so, I'll rather ask if people think that your change is a bugfix or rather a feature | |
| 08:52:28 | bauzas | if this is a feature, we can't backport it upstram (but you can do what you want :p ) | |
| 08:52:54 | bauzas | (what you want internally*) | |
| 09:13:44 | dvo-plv | bauzas, Hello, Maybe you will have a chance to review it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/895924 ? | |
| 09:14:03 | bauzas | yup, I promised it, I will once I'm free | |
| 09:14:17 | dvo-plv | great, thank you | |
| 09:14:32 | bauzas | it just needs myself to ramp up on a few new names :) | |
| 09:22:25 | dvo-plv | yes, sure, I will wait | |
| 09:22:31 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney[m], Hello, are you here ? | |
| 14:08:08 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Warn if we find compute services in cell0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897246 | |
| 15:03:34 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up service_get_all() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897674 | |
| 15:40:38 | gibi | dansmith: thanks for the updates I'm +2 all the way ^^ | |
| 15:40:49 | dansmith | gibi: i saw, thanks | |
| 15:41:00 | dansmith | and thanks for pointing out my n00b n^2 code ;P | |
| 15:43:52 | sean-k-mooney | i can add that to my list fo things to reveiew | |
| 15:44:08 | sean-k-mooney | procedural question do we need a specless blueprint or bug for those | |
| 15:45:18 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think there is any intent to backprot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897076 ? | |
| 15:46:32 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, Hello | |
| 15:46:54 | sean-k-mooney | dvo-plv: o/ | |
| 15:47:11 | dvo-plv | I would like to discuss out blueprint regarding NT NIC support. But it too late today, can we talk tomorrow? | |
| 15:47:34 | dvo-plv | when it will be comfortable for you ? | |
| 15:51:05 | sean-k-mooney | honestly i need to reload context. | |
| 15:51:36 | sean-k-mooney | so we can chat during the week but im not sure when ill be free. ping me durnign the week when your around | |
| 16:23:49 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: I'm calling it a followup to the original BP, which is why I tagged it as such | |
| 16:40:20 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:41:10 | sean-k-mooney | i didnt sleep great last night so i may not get to it today but if i dont ill review them tommorow if someone else does not review them in the interim | |
| 16:41:42 | dansmith | no rush | |
| 17:37:34 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Compile mdev samples for nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897708 | |
| 17:42:12 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Compile mdev samples for nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897708 | |
| 17:50:07 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add initial healthcheck support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825015 | |
| 18:39:29 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Compile mdev samples for nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897708 | |
| 18:45:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: cpu: make governors to be optional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885352 | |
| 18:46:07 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add initial healthcheck support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825015 | |
| 20:16:23 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Compile mdev samples for nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897708 | |
| 21:16:52 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Compile mdev samples for nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897708 | |
| 21:58:11 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Compile mdev samples for nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897708 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-10 | |||
| 01:06:09 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to convert_image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870934 | |
| 05:52:00 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds device tagging functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/895162 | |
| 06:00:36 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds device tagging functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/895162 | |
| 06:35:33 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds device tagging functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/895162 | |
| 07:13:47 | hamidlotfi_ | Hi there, | |
| 07:13:47 | hamidlotfi_ | In the nova database, I see much `LOCK WAIT` on the `neutron.ports` table | |
| 07:13:47 | hamidlotfi_ | and I putting a sample log for the lock wait | |
| 07:13:47 | hamidlotfi_ | I want to know if is this a bug in the structure of a table or the script of the update or the user mistake. | |
| 07:13:52 | hamidlotfi_ | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/o4HQQaEK/ | |
| 09:54:27 | hamidlotfi_ | @dansmith @bauzas @sahid_ | |
| 10:22:41 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, Are you here ? | |
| 10:44:28 | sean-k-mooney | dvo-plv: o/ | |
| 10:45:13 | dvo-plv | I wouldl iek to talk with you regarding out blueprint nt nic support, if you have free time for it | |
| 10:45:46 | dvo-plv | previously we decided that we will try to pass socket name with ovs command for dpdk port type | |
| 10:47:09 | sean-k-mooney | yes and i ask can we pass the name to ovs when addign the port so that we didn not have to compute one that matched the nic driver format | |
| 10:47:45 | sean-k-mooney | we also discussed that some of the magic constant are actully discoverable form sysfs like the vf offset | |
| 10:48:13 | dvo-plv | yes | |
| 10:49:19 | dvo-plv | we spent some time on the investigation and this is not possible to do it for dpdk port type with ovs. there will be alot of changes, DPDK community will not approve it | |
| 10:49:57 | sean-k-mooney | thats not ideal | |
| 10:50:23 | dvo-plv | So I would like to get back to the separate os-vif plugin | |
| 10:50:45 | dvo-plv | what do you think about that ? | |
| 10:50:50 | sean-k-mooney | not nessiarly what that means is that nova needs to tell neutron the vf specific info | |
| 10:51:20 | sean-k-mooney | so we need to pass info to the ml2 driver in the binding_profile | |
| 10:51:52 | sean-k-mooney | neutron can then use that to generate the socket path. alternitivly we could jsut generate the path ourselve in nova | |
| 10:52:21 | dvo-plv | path is not a problem, specific socket name is the root cause | |
| 10:52:44 | sean-k-mooney | the socket name is path of the path :) | |
| 10:52:47 | sean-k-mooney | but yes | |
| 10:54:51 | dvo-plv | So, we can somehow use port binding profile for this purposes? | |
| 10:56:17 | sean-k-mooney | yes that is what its for to pass info form nova to the network backend | |
| 10:56:27 | sean-k-mooney | we normally sotre the pci_adress in it | |