| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-09-12 | |||
| 08:04:28 | bauzas | the objects relationships diffezr | |
| 08:04:42 | stephenfin | the relationships haven't changed. All that has changed is how we describe them | |
| 08:04:45 | bauzas | but the docs don't tell anything about the executed JOINs | |
| 08:05:18 | bauzas | stephenfin: that's my natural first thoughts, but then I wonder if the description change may arise some query modification | |
| 08:05:24 | stephenfin | this model is preferred because it's more explicit and iiuc allows for type hinting without a separate plugin | |
| 08:05:31 | bauzas | since relationships are now both-ways | |
| 08:06:07 | stephenfin | they were always both ways | |
| 08:06:23 | stephenfin | for example: look at the first thing we modified in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860829/1/nova/db/api/models.py | |
| 08:06:37 | stephenfin | sorry, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860829/1/nova/db/api/models.py#b150 (with anchor) | |
| 08:07:05 | stephenfin | that's saying the local side is called 'host_mapping' and the remote side is called 'cell_mapping' | |
| 08:07:16 | stephenfin | as defined by the backref | |
| 08:07:39 | stephenfin | now, instead of declaring both of these on one side, we declare it on both sides | |
| 08:08:20 | stephenfin | so if anything it's a bit more duplication but for the advantage of explicitness and readability/parseability | |
| 08:16:39 | stephenfin | bauzas: here, compare the output of these. First, with backref: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bD4K8pJoSl212q37kvEZ/ | |
| 08:16:48 | stephenfin | then, with back_populates: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bonhcuiyNJtYmM0wITE0/ | |
| 08:17:00 | bauzas | excellent, that's what I was testing | |
| 08:17:09 | stephenfin | they're modified versions of my examples from https://that.guru/blog/sqlalchemy-relationships-without-foreign-keys/ | |
| 08:17:23 | stephenfin | spoiler: it's the same SQL | |
| 08:18:32 | bauzas | so the main thing to doublecheck is that the implicit relationship that was given by the other way is now explicit in the object | |
| 08:18:41 | bauzas | right? | |
| 08:18:56 | bauzas | because if not, we regress by loosing a JOIN | |
| 08:19:41 | stephenfin | yeah, that makes sense | |
| 08:50:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/2023.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/894060 | |
| 09:44:53 | bauzas | stephenfin: I may have spotted a problem with bdms.deleted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860829 | |
| 09:45:15 | bauzas | stephenfin: I need to go off the keyboard for gym reasons but I'll be back in the afternoon | |
| 09:50:19 | kashyap | Hehe, "gym reasons" | |
| 10:56:17 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove unused relationships https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/894635 | |
| 12:25:45 | bauzas | kashyap: I don't know how to call what I do :) let's say physical prep :) | |
| 13:01:29 | kashyap | Heh, I was just joking, dont' worry :) | |
| 13:34:58 | stephenfin | bauzas: you saw my reply, I assume? | |
| 13:35:18 | stephenfin | i can squash if you'd like but it's much of a muchness given it's "dead code" | |
| 13:35:20 | bauzas | stephenfin: I was literally seconds before pinging you | |
| 13:36:02 | bauzas | stephenfin: my only concern is that I need to check why we have this bdm relationship and I don't trust our test coverage for saying whether it's unused or not | |
| 13:36:32 | bauzas | at least I certainly understand why the backref was limiting to existing BDMs and not the deleted ones | |
| 13:37:50 | bauzas | stephenfin: wouldn't be easier to change the relationship in your first change to continue querying the non-deleted BDMs, and *then* remove the relationship later ? | |
| 13:38:05 | stephenfin | it would but then I need to rebase and lose the +2s :) | |
| 13:38:14 | bauzas | so, we could somehow merge the first one in Bobcat while the latter would be in Caracal | |
| 13:38:41 | bauzas | stephenfin: if this is just about a +2, we can ping sean-k-mooney :) | |
| 13:44:22 | stephenfin | Okay, once I know it won't take many months before it's looked at again :) I'll respin shortly after my current meeting | |
| 13:48:55 | bauzas | sure, I'll look | |
| 13:49:10 | bauzas | again, matter of priorities, y'know< | |
| 14:14:17 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/889177 | |
| 14:30:02 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Replace use of backref https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860829 | |
| 14:30:02 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Stop fetching from security_groups table https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860850 | |
| 14:30:03 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove unused relationships https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/894635 | |
| 14:30:10 | stephenfin | bauzas: sean-k-mooney: ^ | |
| 15:50:09 | bauzas | reminder : nova meeting in 10 mins | |
| 15:50:28 | bauzas | stephenfin: saw your update, thanks, but I need to continue reviewing it | |
| 16:03:28 | bauzas | shit | |
| 16:03:33 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:03:33 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Sep 12 16:03:33 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:03:33 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:03:33 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:03:39 | bauzas | sorry folks about the late start :) | |
| 16:03:44 | auniyal | o/ | |
| 16:03:46 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:03:47 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:03:49 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:03:50 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:03:59 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:04:04 | bauzas | #info One Critical bug | |
| 16:04:09 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1983863 | |
| 16:04:18 | bauzas | but iiuc, the fix is now merged | |
| 16:04:32 | bauzas | so, will be closed soon-ish | |
| 16:04:54 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 49 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:05:00 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:05:05 | bauzas | #info bug baton is bauzas | |
| 16:05:13 | bauzas | taking the baton for this week again | |
| 16:05:19 | bauzas | any bug to discuss ? | |
| 16:05:28 | auniyal | bauzas, ci bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2035095 | |
| 16:06:04 | bauzas | I've seen an excerpt of this | |
| 16:06:11 | bauzas | basically the port doesn't become active | |
| 16:06:18 | bauzas | let's discuss this gate failure in the next topic | |
| 16:06:26 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:06:27 | auniyal | ack, | |
| 16:06:31 | gibi | is it a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1940425 ? | |
| 16:06:32 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:06:43 | bauzas | so | |
| 16:07:03 | bauzas | auniyal: yes indeed, could you please mark it dup ? | |
| 16:07:11 | auniyal | yes | |
| 16:07:18 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:07:50 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:07:57 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:08:01 | bauzas | #info nova-emulation is still b0rked | |
| 16:08:05 | bauzas | #info https://zuul.openstack.org/build/d2ddbb3f307549aaa0575b9ee0f1daab | |
| 16:08:40 | bauzas | lots of keystone failures this time | |
| 16:08:47 | bauzas | so I guess this is unfortunate | |
| 16:11:16 | bauzas | moving on then ? | |
| 16:11:24 | bauzas | shall we discuss any other gate failure ? | |
| 16:12:07 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:12:14 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:12:18 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:22 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:25 | bauzas | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:12:28 | bauzas | #info 2 days before RC1 | |
| 16:12:32 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-rc-potential Etherpad for tracking RCs | |
| 16:12:44 | bauzas | basically all the needed changes are approved now, | |
| 16:12:55 | bauzas | the cycle highlights got a correct round of reviews | |
| 16:13:08 | bauzas | so I'll prepare the reno prelude patch based on the highlights tomorrow morning | |
| 16:14:53 | bauzas | ok, let's jump then | |