| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-31 | |||
| 18:09:33 | sean-k-mooney | im not going to hold the series on that but ya a follow up would likely be a good idea | |
| 18:09:54 | JayF | ack, I might wait for it to land and do the follow up directly against master, just to ensure I don't accidentally restack the whole set | |
| 18:10:03 | JayF | but I am making a note in my calendar to check for it tomorrow morning | |
| 18:10:06 | sean-k-mooney | we have 2 +2 on everything now | |
| 18:10:15 | sean-k-mooney | so ill add a +w to that shortly | |
| 18:10:17 | JayF | exactly why I don't wanna risk accidentally re-pushing them :D | |
| 18:10:23 | sean-k-mooney | im just going to review the one patch i did not look at | |
| 18:10:48 | sean-k-mooney | heheh -R is useful to prevent change but ya we can fix this after FF | |
| 18:11:11 | JayF | I'd love to learn that trick anyway :D | |
| 18:12:28 | sean-k-mooney | it just prevents it doing any rebases | |
| 18:14:45 | sean-k-mooney | ok food just arrived. i skimed the 3rd patch and didnt see anything at a glance so im going to rely on the other reviwes and i added +w to the second patch | |
| 18:15:00 | sean-k-mooney | so the seriese shoudl have +2w all the way | |
| 18:16:17 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: ill try and find time later tonight to look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Funified-limits-nova-tool-and-docs | |
| 18:16:28 | melwitt | Uggla: re: your service token question from earlier. I dunno if you are using a "[manila]" conf section or similar, but the get_sdk_adapter helper "as-is" only considers a conf section for the given service type. the nova/service_auth.py is a helper method that will use the [service_user] conf group (allowing for sharing of the settings and not have to duplicate them for each service's conf section, for example) | |
| 18:16:46 | sean-k-mooney | if other get to it before me however dont wait for my review | |
| 18:16:48 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 18:19:41 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: thanks � seeya later | |
| 18:19:41 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: thanks 🙏 seeya later | |
| 18:22:21 | melwitt | Uggla: I _think_ if you added send_service_user_token = True in the [manila] section alongside the other [manila] auth it will work as-is (assuming you are wanting to send a service user token with a request). to make it work with [service_user] I think you would have to update get_sdk_adapter to accept an auth'ed session (for example Session(auth=service_auth.get_auth_plugin()) and then pass that to Connection(session=<session>) | |
| 18:22:21 | melwitt | https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest/user/connection.html#from-existing-authenticated-session | |
| 18:55:20 | zer0c00l | sean-k-mooney: FYI https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2033681 | |
| 19:06:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Deprecate ironic.peer_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883346 | |
| 19:06:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457 | |
| 19:06:40 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889947 | |
| 21:00:23 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Limit nodes by ironic shard key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886980 | |
| 21:00:31 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Modify the comment that is confused https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/809948 | |
| 21:02:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 | |
| 21:02:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update serial console example client for py3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878080 | |
| 21:02:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove unused mocks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867789 | |
| 21:02:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix tox docs target https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891033 | |
| 21:48:44 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: o/ | |
| 21:49:43 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: o/ | |
| 21:50:48 | sean-k-mooney | so the way the doc and porting tool are managing vcpu quota is not correct | |
| 21:50:51 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891646/5/nova/cmd/manage.py#3461 | |
| 21:51:13 | sean-k-mooney | but i think we can adress both of those issues in a followup patch | |
| 21:51:45 | sean-k-mooney | when migrating the quota on flavor.vcpu it should not be mapped 1:1 to the vcpu resouce class limit exclively | |
| 21:51:58 | sean-k-mooney | we need to also set the same limit for PCPUs | |
| 21:52:30 | sean-k-mooney | since flavor.vcpu can be either VCPU alloctions , PCPU alloctions or both in the case of a vm with mixed cpus | |
| 21:52:55 | sean-k-mooney | so while that has the downside of effectivly doubling the qutoa for cpus | |
| 21:53:11 | sean-k-mooney | i think its the only way to avoid over quota issues in general | |
| 21:53:43 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: hm, ok | |
| 21:54:06 | sean-k-mooney | since we have not made the new quota driver the default | |
| 21:54:10 | sean-k-mooney | just deprecated the old one | |
| 21:54:16 | sean-k-mooney | im fine with doing that in a followup | |
| 21:54:25 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: you've reminded me there's a config option around this https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#workarounds.unified_limits_count_pcpu_as_vcpu | |
| 21:54:33 | melwitt | as well | |
| 21:54:50 | sean-k-mooney | oh ya there is/was | |
| 21:54:56 | melwitt | ack. I'm working on follow up stuff | |
| 21:55:27 | sean-k-mooney | i have approved the two patches as they are since for most peopel it will do what they need | |
| 21:56:10 | melwitt | thank you | |
| 21:57:10 | sean-k-mooney | no worreis i came online to do that before i head to bed so ill chat to you soon o/ | |
| 21:57:46 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: thanks � ttyl o/ | |
| 21:57:46 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: thanks 🙏 ttyl o/ | |
| 23:54:12 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add 'limits migrate_to_unified_limits' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891646 | |
| 23:54:19 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add documentation for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893127 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-09-01 | |||
| 04:44:37 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891648 | |
| 04:56:39 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} for "Bobcat" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/887255 | |
| 06:01:31 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462 | |
| 06:03:38 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits: PCPU and documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462 | |
| 06:04:39 | melwitt | johnthetubaguy, bauzas, sean-k-mooney: followup for unified limits to handle PCPU and add a bit more detail to docs ^ thanks | |
| 06:20:01 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits: PCPU and documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462 | |
| 06:33:57 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Refactor CinderFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893464 | |
| 06:33:58 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893465 | |
| 06:33:59 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893466 | |
| 06:35:30 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893467 | |
| 06:47:10 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Adds regression functional test for 1980720 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893468 | |
| 06:47:11 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Refactor CinderFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893469 | |
| 06:47:12 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893470 | |
| 06:47:13 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893471 | |
| 06:47:14 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893472 | |
| 07:27:41 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Adds regression functional test for 1980720 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893474 | |
| 07:27:42 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Refactor CinderFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893475 | |
| 07:27:43 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893476 | |
| 07:27:44 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893477 | |
| 07:27:45 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893478 | |
| 07:40:52 | bauzas | morning folks | |
| 07:52:47 | bauzas | melwitt: on it | |
| 07:53:02 | bauzas | thanks for the quick follow-ups | |
| 07:53:47 | bauzas | auniyal: your series was tagged as a blueprint | |
| 07:54:17 | bauzas | auniyal: accordingly, you can't backport it in stable branches as it would change a behavior | |
| 07:57:25 | bauzas | see the backport policy rules that are given here https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#appropriate-fixes | |
| 08:07:08 | ykarel | Hi is there some known issue with test_reboot_server_hard, recently saw many failures | |
| 08:07:45 | ykarel | Fails like AssertionError: time.struct_time(tm_year=2023, tm_mon=9, tm_mday=1, tm_hour=7, tm_min=26, tm_sec=24, tm_wday=4, tm_yday=244, tm_isdst=0) not greater than time.struct_time(tm_year=2023, tm_mon=9, tm_mday=1, tm_hour=7, tm_min=26, tm_sec=24, tm_wday=4, tm_yday=244, tm_isdst=0) | |
| 08:14:39 | ykarel | k didn't find a bug report, so reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/2033752 | |
| 08:14:45 | ykarel | it's started just few hours back | |
| 08:41:58 | bauzas | ykarel: oh | |
| 08:42:08 | bauzas | probably related to some recent merge we did | |
| 08:42:47 | bauzas | because now we call Cinder when rebooting so the performance could be impactedcx | |
| 08:53:01 | frickler | elodilles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 is still blocked by your W-1, can you please check? | |
| 08:54:29 | frickler | bauzas: calling cinder for a reboot? I'm curious about that, do you happen to have a reference? | |
| 08:55:08 | frickler | ah, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 ? | |
| 08:55:12 | bauzas | frickler: see the bug report | |
| 08:55:16 | bauzas | yea | |
| 08:56:44 | elodilles | frickler: looking, thanks | |
| 08:57:03 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: dansmith: auniyal: looks like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 created a gate issue | |
| 08:57:04 | frickler | a reno referencing "this change" is weird wording btw | |
| 08:57:44 | bauzas | frickler: we can modify this | |
| 08:57:53 | auniyal | bauzas, ack | |
| 08:58:04 | bauzas | in general we say "Now, Nova does X or Y" | |
| 08:58:26 | bauzas | or "With this new feature named "blah", now we have" | |