| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-22 | |||
| 18:40:41 | sean-k-mooney | right it does not i was asking can invtsc be disabled and use the hpet instead | |
| 18:41:17 | sean-k-mooney | the invtsc flag tells the guest tha tthe TSC is stable and wont change frequency | |
| 18:41:31 | spencerh` | I'll have to benchmark that to see if it solves the same issues that invtsc does. AFAIK, these are not fungible as far as the workload is concerned. | |
| 18:42:04 | sean-k-mooney | they gerneally shoudl be if the workload is not direfctly calling the TSC | |
| 18:42:17 | spencerh` | The workload does directly call the tsc. | |
| 18:42:21 | sean-k-mooney | the tsc is often used because its really fast to read | |
| 18:42:39 | sean-k-mooney | but its also generally not the most stable time source espcially in a vm | |
| 18:42:41 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 19:34:57 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: the lazy load serise all looks good overal. i had one of two nits inlien but they are all approved now | |
| 19:35:46 | sean-k-mooney | do you know off the top of your head what "trusted_certs" is used for in the instance. is that related to trusted boot? | |
| 19:51:44 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: it's for this https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/rocky/implemented/nova-validate-certificates.html | |
| 19:52:29 | sean-k-mooney | possibly but why would nova have the certs | |
| 19:53:11 | sean-k-mooney | i would expect that to be a propry of the image and there for in the instnace_system_metadata rather then the instance table | |
| 19:54:08 | sean-k-mooney | oh its form a join | |
| 19:54:11 | sean-k-mooney | ya its that | |
| 19:54:14 | sean-k-mooney | """This change will update the InstanceExtra schema to support a trusted_certs column, """ | |
| 20:04:02 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: introduce global greenpool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873061 | |
| 20:05:08 | sean-k-mooney | i have 7 failing funcitonal tests i need to update but i think that is passing everythign else | |
| 20:11:15 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: ack thanks | |
| 22:45:18 | opendevreview | Spencer Harmon proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt tsc_frequency https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891924 | |
| 22:54:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Avoid lazy-loading in resize and rebuild/evacuate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891336 | |
| 23:53:04 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enable use of native threads in scatter_gather_cells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/650172 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-23 | |||
| 04:02:18 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enable use of native threads in scatter_gather_cells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/650172 | |
| 11:08:22 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Catch processutils exception by mount() properly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892496 | |
| 14:01:31 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: introduce global greenpool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873061 | |
| 14:01:51 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: dansmith melwitt ^ i think thats the best i can do | |
| 14:02:27 | sean-k-mooney | if you figure out how to adress the remaining 7 test failures when im raising for greenlets too let me know | |
| 14:02:42 | sean-k-mooney | but i think we coudl proceed with this as is and still get most of the benifit | |
| 14:02:58 | sean-k-mooney | 7 possible leaks is a lot better then the 300+ i started with | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-24 | |||
| 01:21:27 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enable use of native threads in scatter_gather_cells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/650172 | |
| 02:07:18 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role context in policy tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594 | |
| 02:14:08 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role context in policy tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594 | |
| 02:33:56 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in server_external_events API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892633 | |
| 02:47:14 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in assisted_volume_snapshots APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892635 | |
| 02:50:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove a lazy load on every server show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891352 | |
| 03:25:40 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891648 | |
| 05:28:37 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in assisted_volume_snapshots APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892635 | |
| 05:55:40 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in server_external_events API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892633 | |
| 06:17:53 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Default os-assisted-volume-snapshots APIs to service role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892635 | |
| 14:27:12 | kashyap | Can anyone give W+1 to this? - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886825/ | |
| 14:28:45 | kashyap | (Pick next min libvirt / QEMU versions for "C" (2024) release) | |
| 14:29:02 | kashyap | dansmith++ For doing the rechecks on the patch below! | |
| 14:30:35 | dansmith | below? | |
| 14:51:26 | kashyap | Sorry, I mean the patch that follows the above (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/887255/6) | |
| 14:56:41 | gibi | ohh this reminds me of https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-08-22-16.00.log.html#l-22 from the last meeting. kashyap could you check it if you have time? | |
| 16:50:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Pick next min libvirt / QEMU versions for "C" (2024) release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886825 | |
| 18:39:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Avoid lazy-loads on server create https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891520 | |
| 19:56:21 | JayF | I'm getting strange errors when running Nova unit tests locally; tracebacks during test discovery > AttributeError: 'EntryPoint' object has no attribute 'module_name' | |
| 22:41:57 | JayF | Circling back, I wonder if this is a tox version thing? Are you all still expecting 3? When I activated the tox venv and did a pip install -e . in the nova checkout, left the venv and re-ran tox the tests ran | |
| 23:04:03 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: introduce global greenpool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873061 | |
| 23:40:23 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Avoid lazy-loads in resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891605 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-25 | |||
| 01:07:56 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: block_device: Add encryption attributes to swap disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/884312 | |
| 01:59:47 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: remove untils.spawn_n https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892722 | |
| 02:51:06 | opendevreview | Natz cheng proposed openstack/nova master: Updated links in documentation to be safe links https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892724 | |
| 03:33:41 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891648 | |
| 03:54:54 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: block_device: Add encryption attributes to swap disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/884312 | |
| 08:07:38 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, Hello | |
| 08:08:01 | dvo-plv | I would like to talk regarding issue, which you mentioned here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/869510 | |
| 08:12:48 | kashyap | gibi: Just saw your ping earlier; will check (the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2023035) | |
| 08:13:45 | gibi | kashyap: thanks! | |
| 08:20:42 | kashyap | gibi: Related: Can you get unblock the Workflow-1 here? : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 | |
| 08:21:09 | kashyap | Elod is on PTO and that W-1 doesn't apply (as he did based on a comment from Amit, and Amit took back his -1) | |
| 08:28:54 | opendevreview | Ryota, Ochiai proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Update the installation guide for RHEL and CentOS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892607 | |
| 08:49:11 | gibi | kashyap: do I understand correctly that we don't want to backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/869950 just https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 ? | |
| 08:53:36 | gibi | btw I cannot remove elodilles_pto's -w you need infra's help for that | |
| 09:03:51 | gibi | kashyap: according to my sources Elod is back on Monday | |
| 09:12:23 | auniyal | yes kashyap, I was in doubt if this need to be backported too - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/869950, | |
| 09:12:23 | auniyal | so the reason to remove +1 is to get attention of cores, as there was no backport patch for 869950 | |
| 09:14:17 | auniyal | gibi, can you please review this - https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:dangling-volumes | |
| 09:20:28 | kashyap | gibi: Yes, your understanding is correct. Only https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 | |
| 09:20:46 | kashyap | auniyal: (It - 869950 - is not required.) | |
| 09:20:48 | opendevreview | Ryota, Ochiai proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Update the installation guide for RHEL and CentOS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892607 | |
| 09:25:38 | auniyal | ack | |
| 09:48:35 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, I found that socket can be different for vendors. So I would like to use something like that https://paste.opendev.org/show/bKfuy2TzkygTyLtyW8TE/ | |
| 09:49:33 | dvo-plv | this method creates scoket name accodring to the formula which user can provide via binding port profile. So in the result we will get multinic support and each nix can have uniq socket name | |
| 09:50:15 | dvo-plv | this method we can call here to format correct socket name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/869510/13/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/openvswitch/mech_driver/mech_openvswitch.py#221 | |
| 10:44:23 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix exception catch when volume mount fails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852795 | |
| 12:50:47 | sean-k-mooney | speaking of +1... gibi care to take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873061/9 | |
| 12:51:14 | sean-k-mooney | i dont know if we need more disucssion on that in general but i also too a swing at removing spwan_n entirly in the followup patch | |
| 12:51:17 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: ^ | |
| 12:52:27 | sean-k-mooney | that might need more discusion but i think its proably a good idea in the long run. | |
| 12:58:09 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I will check. I see that it was improved since I last read it | |
| 13:55:54 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [functional] Avoid leaking greenlet in UnifiedLimits tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892791 | |
| 13:56:28 | auniyal | Hi dansmith, can you please have another look on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457 | |
| 14:17:50 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [functional]Fix remaining greenlet leaks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/892793 | |
| 14:18:41 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: fixed the remaining functional leaks and set the env variable for the functionl env to enforce we don't introduce new ones. | |
| 14:23:05 | gibi | so we can patch the leaks without switching to spawn or using cast as call | |
| 14:23:26 | sean-k-mooney | we can yes | |
| 14:23:44 | sean-k-mooney | i just fixed them becuase i was force to do it when swaping to spawn | |
| 14:23:49 | sean-k-mooney | so i did it in one pathc | |
| 14:24:15 | sean-k-mooney | i was not swaping to spwan to fix tehm i was fixing them so we could swap to spawn form spawn_n | |
| 14:25:19 | sean-k-mooney | i am fine to proceed with your leak fix for the final test | |
| 14:25:25 | sean-k-mooney | and then rebase the spawn change on top | |
| 14:25:33 | sean-k-mooney | so it clearer what is required for that | |
| 14:25:45 | sean-k-mooney | your fixes are less invasive then mine | |
| 14:26:23 | gibi | cool | |
| 14:26:36 | gibi | in the long run I have no problem removing the spawn_n usage from nova | |
| 14:26:52 | gibi | as far as I remember there was no good reason to have it in the first place | |
| 14:27:14 | gibi | it is less resource to use spawn_n but I don't think it is significant compared to spawn | |
| 14:28:16 | sean-k-mooney | so thats the thing | |