| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-11 | |||
| 17:40:51 | abhishekk | looking for it now, | |
| 17:40:58 | abhishekk | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c045d22dee34b08bb8767a1f972db09/log/job-output.txt#22303 this is the test right? | |
| 17:42:08 | dansmith | I see location_import task running so I assume that means it is | |
| 17:42:22 | dansmith | abhishekk: any server snapshot task should trigger it | |
| 17:42:38 | abhishekk | yeah | |
| 17:42:40 | abhishekk | me too | |
| 17:44:07 | abhishekk | location_import-CalculateHash | |
| 17:45:11 | abhishekk | at least some positive signs :D | |
| 17:47:06 | dansmith | yup, I definitely expected more fails for sure | |
| 17:52:41 | abhishekk | on that note, I am stepping in the weekend mood | |
| 17:53:02 | dansmith | enjoy ;) | |
| 17:53:07 | abhishekk | See you monday, happy weekend o/~ | |
| 19:42:59 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing py3.11 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891228 | |
| 19:43:31 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: DNM: testing py3.11 job not running on 2023.1 template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891113 | |
| 20:43:23 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891235 | |
| 20:43:41 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891114 | |
| 20:50:07 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use futurist.ThreadPoolExecutor in scatter_gather_cells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/650172 | |
| 21:14:23 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891235 | |
| 21:14:37 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891114 | |
| 21:34:40 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876447 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-12 | |||
| 00:39:42 | opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Testing against oslo.messaging change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891245 | |
| 01:03:12 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use OSC in run-evacuate-hook instead of novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247 | |
| 01:08:33 | melwitt | gmann, dansmith: ^ fix (hopefully) for nova-live-migration, nova-live-migration-ceph, and nova-ovs-hybrid-plug POST_FAILURE | |
| 01:12:09 | gmann | melwitt: thanks, I hope we do not need this devstack fix/workaround after your fix right? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/891230 | |
| 01:12:46 | gmann | melwitt: devstack one failed in gate so thinking if your fix solve the issue then we do not need to recheck that | |
| 01:17:49 | melwitt | gmann: oh, I had missed that patch, sorry. I only looked for nova patches 😣 yeah we shouldn't need it after my patch (but let's see if it passes 😛) but either way we can land the devstack one and if my patch works we can revert later | |
| 01:17:49 | melwitt | gmann: oh, I had missed that patch, sorry. I only looked for nova patches 😣 yeah we shouldn't need it after my patch (but let's see if it passes 😛) but either way we can land the devstack one and if my patch works we can revert later | |
| 01:27:42 | gmann | melwitt: ok, sounds good. waiting for gate result | |
| 01:43:56 | gmann | melwitt: you missed to pass server in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247/1/roles/run-evacuate-hook/files/test_negative_evacuate.sh#b20 | |
| 01:44:10 | gmann | it is failing in live migration job https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/aef77238f1d24785825165f8bd2ca913/console | |
| 01:44:12 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use OSC in run-evacuate-hook instead of novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247 | |
| 01:44:26 | melwitt | gmann: literally just saw, I knew I would do something like that � | |
| 01:44:26 | melwitt | gmann: literally just saw, I knew I would do something like that 😝 | |
| 01:44:33 | melwitt | let's try this again | |
| 01:44:47 | gmann | melwitt: thanks. and its friday :) | |
| 01:45:36 | melwitt | heh | |
| 05:32:36 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876447 | |
| 14:22:58 | opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Testing against oslo.messaging change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891245 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-13 | |||
| 06:21:13 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Fix bindep for Debian bookworm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891255 | |
| 06:23:26 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bindep for Debian bookworm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891256 | |
| 06:24:21 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing py3.11 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891228 | |
| 07:17:18 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bindep for Debian bookworm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891256 | |
| 07:18:06 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing py3.11 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891228 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-14 | |||
| 11:08:34 | sean-k-mooney | gibi can you take a look at this short change form melwitt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888513 | |
| 11:11:34 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Removed explicit call to delete attachment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891289 | |
| 11:26:22 | opendevreview | Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova master: Do not untrack resources of a server being unshelved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/890406 | |
| 11:26:22 | opendevreview | Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug #2025480 in a functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891290 | |
| 15:42:42 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Use OSC in run-evacuate-hook instead of novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247 | |
| 16:03:00 | dansmith | wow, shocking.. I'm on my 27th recheck of a variable rename patch and melwitt sneaks through with one run | |
| 16:18:55 | sean-k-mooney | the ci has favorites obviously | |
| 16:20:02 | JayF | I know in Ironic we have started corrolating that behavior to tzs: our contributors in stranger TZs often are able to get changes rechecked thru easier than folks working 'peak' times. | |
| 16:20:33 | sean-k-mooney | ya i think that is just that your less likely to get a slow node | |
| 16:28:01 | dansmith | yeah, definitely not the case here, because melwitt and I are in the same TZ and it was approved and merged this morning :) | |
| 16:52:23 | clarkb | I've said it before and will say it again. We are our own noisy neighbor in many of these clouds. Particulularly for disk io and swapping. | |
| 16:54:23 | dansmith | yup, and IO-related failures are definitely lessened over the weekends | |
| 16:54:50 | dansmith | but I rechecked this one patch eight times over last weekend when there was nothing else running and it's still unmerged because we have enough non-load-related fails :) | |
| 17:10:24 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Avoid lazy-loading in resize and rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891336 | |
| 17:56:58 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid lazy-loading in resize and rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891336 | |
| 17:56:58 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Log excessive lazy-loading behavior https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891340 | |
| 19:45:32 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891347 | |
| 20:01:43 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid lazy-loading in resize and rebuild/evacuate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891336 | |
| 20:01:43 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove two lazy loads on every server show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891352 | |
| 20:50:06 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix up inconsistent max_count argument in o-d-ms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888470 | |
| 21:15:49 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid lazy-loading in resize and rebuild/evacuate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891336 | |
| 21:15:50 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove a lazy load on every server show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891352 | |
| 22:52:27 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove a lazy load on every server show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891352 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-08-15 | |||
| 10:01:52 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: as we really like shelve/unshelve to clean up messy situations this bugfix probably very useful https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F2025480 | |
| 10:12:08 | kevko | Hi everyone, i would like to ask if someone can approve this blueprint proposed by my colleaguage Viktor Krivak, we already have a code implemented but waiting for specs approval , so we can send patches to gerrit...could someone look into please ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/890779 , thank you very much | |
| 10:13:17 | kevko | ^^ it's solution for az-affinity and anti-az-affinity which can be also used by octavia to reach better high-availability as amphoras will be spread across AZs | |
| 10:14:14 | gibi | kevko: we reached nova spec freeze for 2023.2 (bobcat) on 6th of July https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html#b-nova-spec-freeze | |
| 10:14:46 | gibi | this is why you don't get attention on the spec | |
| 10:14:59 | kevko | hmm, does it mean that this can be approved for caracal only right ? | |
| 10:15:17 | gibi | kevko: yes | |
| 10:15:25 | gibi | kevko: you can see the caracal schedule here https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html | |
| 10:16:00 | kevko | hmm, can we push patchsets for this to gerrit and mark as DNM for example, we would like to see zull results etc ... | |
| 10:16:27 | gibi | kevko: yes, you can do that | |
| 10:16:39 | kevko | (because i read somewhere that it's "forbidden" to push the code if spec is not approved ... so i am better asking ) | |
| 10:16:47 | gibi | kevko: that will help the spec reviewers as well to see not just the spec proposal but the resulting implementation | |
| 10:17:11 | gibi | kevko: if you can point me to the place where it was written then I will be happy to fix that | |
| 10:18:01 | kevko | let me find it | |
| 10:35:13 | kevko | https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/2023.2-template.rst | |
| 10:39:57 | kevko | Gibi, so question is when we can except that new directory for caracal release will be available for specs repo to move spec for caracal ? | |
| 10:45:52 | kevko | Gibi, can we create directory for 2024.1 specs now ? | |
| 11:36:56 | gibi | kevko: which part of the spec template suggested that you should not push code for review? | |
| 11:36:59 | gibi | I see | |
| 11:37:01 | gibi | "You should aim to get your spec approved before writing your code. While you are free to write prototypes and code before getting your spec approved, its possible that the outcome of the spec review process leads you towards a fundamentally different solution than you first envisaged." | |
| 11:37:52 | kevko | yep ..maybe misunderstood .. | |
| 11:39:45 | gibi | kevko: it is basically a warning that we might ask you during the spec review to change the direction of the spec and therefore you might need to rewrite the code | |
| 11:40:22 | gibi | on the directory question. Technically we could propose the directory right now | |
| 11:46:06 | gibi | kevko: you can propose a similar patch to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/872068 to create the 2024.1 directory | |
| 11:49:16 | kevko | gibi Thank you, I really appreciate it :), then if the spec will be in right directory, can we expect that someone will check the spec even if now it's bobcat cycle ? or we will wait until december ? | |
| 12:17:58 | opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/891468 | |
| 12:20:42 | opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add availability zone-aware affinity filter to the scheduler https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/890779 | |
| 12:32:47 | gibi | kevko: to be honest right now is vacation period, then we will be busy finishing the content for the bobcat release. So I would not expect much review on caracal spec until the bobcat release is done in early october. | |
| 12:46:30 | kevko | gibi understand, that's apity | |
| 12:46:33 | kevko | a pity | |
| 13:11:17 | sean-k-mooney | kevko: i would expect it to get attention in mid september | |
| 13:11:22 | sean-k-mooney | it wont be december | |
| 13:11:58 | sean-k-mooney | but we will be busy with release work for then ext 3-4 weeks and thats where most of the attention will be focused until rc1 is released | |
| 13:13:11 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: like i s a strong statement for using shelve to recover but it works surpising well in may siturations | |