| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-18 | |||
| 16:31:04 | sean-k-mooney | but the base job should be fine as is | |
| 16:31:11 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:31:20 | bauzas | auniyal: wanted to add anything ? | |
| 16:31:24 | auniyal | #info Please review these backport patches of stable 2023.1, zed and yoga for next minor release | |
| 16:31:47 | auniyal | #info most of these already have one +2 and need only one +2 and +W | |
| 16:32:21 | auniyal | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/release-liaison-PatchesToReview | |
| 16:32:33 | sean-k-mooney | zed and yoga are currently blocked. (zed need the devstack-ceph-plugin patch to be merged) and yoga is waitign on the 3 patches to be backported for teh rebuild test | |
| 16:32:55 | bauzas | yeah see elodilles's comments previously | |
| 16:33:09 | bauzas | I just +2d/Wd the zed patch which fixes nova | |
| 16:33:19 | sean-k-mooney | i coudl premtivley propsoe the yoga backports | |
| 16:33:48 | elodilles | thanks in advance sean-k-mooney \o/ | |
| 16:33:49 | sean-k-mooney | but we need to followup with the devstack-ceph-pluging folks and devstack | |
| 16:33:59 | sean-k-mooney | ack i ll do that now while i think of it | |
| 16:34:13 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: i think devstack-ceph-pluging patch is not needed for yoga | |
| 16:34:28 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: only nova-lvm is broken in yoga, afaik | |
| 16:34:41 | sean-k-mooney | yoga should be using unpinned tempest | |
| 16:34:52 | sean-k-mooney | so it shoudl need both | |
| 16:35:00 | sean-k-mooney | but we can see i guess | |
| 16:35:03 | elodilles | hmmm, OK | |
| 16:35:14 | elodilles | i saw it passing | |
| 16:35:31 | sean-k-mooney | perhaps validation are enabeld on yoga already? | |
| 16:35:37 | sean-k-mooney | for ceph | |
| 16:35:52 | elodilles | good question | |
| 16:36:01 | sean-k-mooney | we can check after the meeting | |
| 16:36:20 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:36:41 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:36:55 | bauzas | can we move on ? | |
| 16:37:09 | auniyal | bauzas, I targeted to do minor release tomorrow 19th July, but most of them are not merged yet, so will wait till next wednesday | |
| 16:37:09 | auniyal | thats all from my side thanks | |
| 16:37:15 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:38:41 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:38:47 | bauzas | nothing on the agenda | |
| 16:38:52 | bauzas | anything anyone ? | |
| 16:40:27 | bauzas | ok, let's give you back 20 mins | |
| 16:40:29 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:40:33 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:40:33 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 18 16:40:33 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:40:33 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-18-16.00.html | |
| 16:40:33 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-18-16.00.txt | |
| 16:40:33 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-18-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:40:40 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:41:13 | elodilles | auniyal: thanks for dealing with the release, ping me if i can help with anything about it! | |
| 16:42:00 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:42:38 | auniyal | ack elodilles, only thing we need is more reviews, most of the +2 are from you only, thanks | |
| 16:43:05 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: ill pull https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888230 back without any deps and we can see if it passes on yoga | |
| 16:43:19 | sean-k-mooney | if not ill add the devstack and devstack-plugin-ceph pathces too | |
| 16:43:53 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ack, sounds like a plan! thanks :) | |
| 16:55:18 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: enable validations in nova-lvm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888784 | |
| 17:49:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Drop Fedora support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886596 | |
| 18:25:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/victoria: [stable-only] Cap virtualenv/setuptools https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888681 | |
| 18:52:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/zed: enable validations in nova-lvm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888230 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-19 | |||
| 08:53:43 | dvo-plv | Hello, Community | |
| 08:54:19 | dvo-plv | Maybe you will have a chance to review this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075 | |
| 11:02:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: enable validations in nova-lvm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888784 | |
| 11:37:48 | elodilles | bauzas: sorry, my OCD couldn't leave the 'unrelated whatespace change' in the train-eol patch o:) could you please +1 it, to have PTL-Approved triggered on the patch? o:) | |
| 11:37:51 | elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885365 | |
| 11:37:52 | elodilles | bauzas: ^^^ | |
| 12:19:15 | bauzas | elodilles: done | |
| 12:35:12 | elodilles | thx o/ | |
| 13:02:38 | kashyap | Hm, this timeout looks like an unrelated failure to me - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8525a961871c4602bedf3df605f72791 | |
| 13:02:48 | kashyap | (From the test test_resize_volume_backed_server_confirm) | |
| 13:13:22 | sean-k-mooney | the connection to iscsid failed https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8525a961871c4602bedf3df605f72791/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#60338 | |
| 13:13:45 | sean-k-mooney | which later cased Jul 18 14:24:29.793214 np0034705382 nova-compute[74276]: ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server [None req-bfe53067-f154-48c3-8bd7-141efbfa7eba tempest-ServerActionsV293TestJSON-1087987645 tempest-ServerActionsV293TestJSON-1087987645-project-member] Exception during message handling: ValueError: Circular reference detected | |
| 13:13:55 | sean-k-mooney | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8525a961871c4602bedf3df605f72791/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#60449 | |
| 13:14:02 | sean-k-mooney | i have not seen that in a very long time | |
| 13:43:26 | dansmith | kashyap: I saw one of that test failing just now too | |
| 13:43:53 | dansmith | the test failure maybe kinda looked like it didn't actually rebuild the guest, because the host key didn't match (or something) | |
| 13:45:19 | kashyap | dansmith: Aah, I see. The host key mismatch means hopeffully it's a transient issue | |
| 13:45:33 | dansmith | well, I dunno, if we just saw two of them... | |
| 13:57:37 | kashyap | Heh | |
| 17:14:01 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney: i know you play a fair bit with these things .. besides asap2, is there another way to get hw accelerated vxlan.. i'm wondering if ovs-dpdk can work for tenant networks (vxlan) too... but havent seen much reference in docs | |
| 18:05:25 | sean-k-mooney[m] | we do not have support for hardware offloads with dpdk yet | |
| 18:05:39 | sean-k-mooney[m] | in openstack | |
| 18:07:31 | sean-k-mooney[m] | mnaser: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.2/approved/support-napatech-linkvirtualization-smartnic.html is the spec you want | |
| 18:07:56 | sean-k-mooney[m] | that will add support for hardwar offloads with ovs-dpdk in general | |
| 18:08:16 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you do not need asap2 by the way | |
| 18:08:30 | sean-k-mooney[m] | upstream kernel ovs support hardware offloads | |
| 18:08:45 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but you do need the right nic driver | |
| 18:09:19 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you do not need the forked ovs however | |
| 18:10:13 | sean-k-mooney[m] | mnaser: https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/topics/dpdk/phy/#representors is the upstream ovs doc for dpdk hardware offloads | |
| 18:15:31 | sean-k-mooney[m] | https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst#flow-hardware-offload-experimental | |
| 18:35:01 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney[m]: so from an openstack pov, only offload we can do right now is asap2 | |
| 18:35:40 | sean-k-mooney[m] | technially we only supprot kernel ovs hardware offload with upstream ovs | |
| 18:36:49 | sean-k-mooney[m] | the in tree melanox kernel nic driver should be sufficient | |
| 18:37:09 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but asap is what nvidia/mellonx brand it as | |
| 18:37:20 | mnaser | do you know if intel has similar support? | |
| 18:37:46 | sean-k-mooney[m] | not currently. they had poc but no product in the market | |
| 18:40:00 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney[m]: i see, cause i ran into this https://networkbuilders.intel.com/docs/networkbuilders/intel-ethernet-controller-700-series-open-vswitch-hardware-acceleration-application-note.pdf | |
| 18:40:56 | sean-k-mooney[m] | yep with fortvial and ovs-dpdk | |
| 18:41:25 | mnaser | sean-k-mooney[m]: so only possible if that spec gets implemented? | |
| 18:42:06 | sean-k-mooney[m] | yep. dpdk hardware offloads in ovs is experimental | |
| 18:42:49 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but ovs-dpdk has had support for using rte_flow with some offload using fortviale/700 series and later | |
| 18:43:10 | sean-k-mooney[m] | for years | |
| 18:43:28 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but an end to end solution has not really matiarlised | |
| 18:43:35 | mnaser | i see, so really dont have a lot of choices in this section unfortunatel | |
| 18:43:36 | mnaser | y | |
| 18:43:41 | sean-k-mooney[m] | the spec i linked should enable that | |
| 18:44:03 | mnaser | bummer, ive been trying to get these palo alto vm series | |
| 18:44:07 | mnaser | and they refuse to work with mlx nics | |
| 18:44:21 | mnaser | and dpdk cant be offloaded for tenant networks | |