Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-07-11
16:19:17 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:19:27 bauzas elodilles: showtime !
16:19:34 elodilles yepp
16:19:39 elodilles so, my part:
16:19:45 elodilles #info stable gates should be OK from stable/xena to stable/train
16:19:56 elodilles #info stable gate of stable/2023.1 -> stable/yoga mostly broken due to nova-lvm (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2025813) + nova-ceph-multistore job issue
16:20:03 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:20:24 elodilles that's all from me
16:21:00 bauzas ok, let me continue
16:21:08 bauzas #info train-eol patch proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885365
16:21:15 bauzas reviews welcome
16:21:35 bauzas we said that the EM discussion shouldn't impact our train EOL :)
16:22:59 bauzas at least I'd appreciate if some cores could +1 again
16:23:13 bauzas auniyal: you had other items I presume ?
16:23:24 auniyal yes bauzas, there are hardly any new reviews for stable branches
16:23:24 sean-k-mooney ack, for what its worth i noticed os-vifs train gate is failing due to devestack-gate issues
16:23:39 auniyal #info Please review these backport patches of stable 2023.1, zed and yoga for next minor release
16:23:48 auniyal #info most of these already have one +2.
16:23:50 bauzas ack
16:23:52 sean-k-mooney works fine on ussuri but i dont have any interest in actully fix devstack-gate issue/zull v2 legacy jobs
16:24:19 auniyal #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/release-liaison-PatchesToReview
16:24:29 auniyal thats all from my side, thanks
16:24:54 elodilles sean-k-mooney: if we are EOL'ing train, then it not even worth fixing os-vifs train i guess
16:24:58 bauzas cool and thanks
16:25:14 bauzas elodilles: I'm EOLing os-vif in my own patch
16:25:30 elodilles exactly why i say this :)
16:25:54 bauzas okay, I guess we're done with discussing stable branches
16:26:05 sean-k-mooney yep i know i was just rebasing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/841780
16:26:06 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:26:16 sean-k-mooney yesterday and notice it broken on train but not ussuri
16:26:22 bauzas #undo
16:26:22 opendevmeet Removing item from minutes: #topic Open discussion
16:26:23 sean-k-mooney but if we old train i dont need to care
16:26:29 sean-k-mooney so we can move on
16:26:48 bauzas sean-k-mooney: if you want some patch to be merged in train before we eol, please -1 my releases patch
16:27:04 sean-k-mooney its not merged on seve newer branches
16:27:11 sean-k-mooney so i dont wnat to hold it up
16:27:14 bauzas I just provided the existing master SHA1s for each of the projects
16:27:31 bauzas that means that any new merged patch wouldn't be in the eol tag
16:27:47 sean-k-mooney thats ok we have not merged anything since then
16:27:50 sean-k-mooney and i dont expect too
16:28:10 bauzas elodilles: btw. do we have a CI job that tests this and say "eh, look, you want to tag with this sha1, but I see some other patch above, so -1"
16:28:10 elodilles (sean-k-mooney: i propsed a gate fix patch 2 yrs ago: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/807839 :D )
16:28:22 sean-k-mooney ...
16:28:35 sean-k-mooney ok well then we coudl fix it or just not
16:29:10 elodilles bauzas: no, there's no such check, but i ussually check it myself
16:29:31 elodilles bauzas: though it could be added to relmgmt tools, yes
16:29:34 sean-k-mooney i dont really want to delay the eol process but we can discuss this after the meeting
16:29:37 bauzas okay
16:30:02 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I need to drop quickly after the meeting, but sure I let you to discuss this with elodilles
16:30:08 sean-k-mooney ack
16:30:14 elodilles bauzas: and the branch removal script checks if we have patches on top of the EOL tag (but anyway, we cannot modify the tag)
16:30:45 bauzas elodilles: okay, so I'll probably double-check the train branches before we eventually +W
16:30:47 elodilles bauzas: no need, we can continue after the meeting with sean-k-mooney
16:30:52 bauzas cool
16:30:54 bauzas moving on
16:30:57 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:31:04 bauzas (agenda empty)
16:31:16 bauzas oh, actually, there is one
16:31:47 bauzas I'll be off between Tues Aug 1 and Friday Aug 25
16:32:15 bauzas so someone needs to be leading the nova meeting in between Aug 1 and Aug 22
16:32:23 bauzas who wants to do it ? :)
16:32:35 gibi I can do the meeting on 15 and 22
16:32:47 bauzas gibi: appreciated
16:32:53 gibi I'm also off on 1 and 8
16:33:27 bauzas ack so we'll see next week
16:33:37 bauzas either someone proposes or we drop Aug 1 and 8 meetings
16:33:48 gibi ack
16:33:50 bauzas that was it for me
16:34:12 bauzas as every week, anything anyone ?
16:34:17 gibi -
16:34:35 elodilles -
16:35:13 bauzas cool
16:35:20 bauzas I give you all 25 mins back of your time !
16:35:24 gibi thanks!
16:35:25 bauzas thanks all
16:35:28 bauzas #endmeeting
16:35:28 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 11 16:35:28 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:35:28 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-11-16.00.html
16:35:28 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-11-16.00.txt
16:35:28 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-11-16.00.log.html
16:35:44 elodilles thanks bauzas & all o/
16:37:42 sean-k-mooney elodilles: back to os-vif i personally dont have an issue with signel core approving yoru gate fix for train given noone else has objected
16:38:01 sean-k-mooney in almost 2 years
16:38:25 elodilles sean-k-mooney: note that since it's 2 yrs old, it probably won't merge
16:38:53 sean-k-mooney probably but lookign at https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fos-vif+branch:stable%252Ftrain+status:open
16:39:18 sean-k-mooney thre are some patches that might be worht landing but i dont rellly want the risk fo breakign the eol tag by rushing
16:39:40 sean-k-mooney so really im wondiering if its worth fixign those issue vs just taging what we have
16:39:46 elodilles yes, don't break things before the EOL :S
16:40:12 elodilles sean-k-mooney: i'm OK with leaving the branch as it is
16:40:48 sean-k-mooney ok that also works for me. the patchs are aviable and people could apply them to the eol tag if they wanted too
16:40:55 sean-k-mooney so im fine with leave it as is
16:41:51 elodilles the patches will be abandoned, yes, but who else needs it can cherry pick them downstream later
16:43:35 sean-k-mooney actully we have the switchdev ones backported downstream already and i was updating the other patches because i was pulling it downstream too
16:45:17 sean-k-mooney so im not actully that worreied that they will break thigns but just dont want to force in 5 patches right before eol
16:47:40 sean-k-mooney we dont patch things in our downstream without it landing in master first but we do backport thing that gerenally cant be backported upstream due to policy so just because it happend to work in our downstream buidl does not mean it wont break somethign upstream
16:53:05 elodilles sean-k-mooney: yeah, i guess upstream testing can be a bit different...
22:51:44 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Add debug logging when Instance raises OrphanedObjectError https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888160
22:54:54 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Add debug logging when Instance raises OrphanedObjectError https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888161
22:55:35 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Add debug logging when Instance raises OrphanedObjectError https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888162

Earlier   Later