| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-29 | |||
| 18:06:50 | dvo-plv | def test_resize_virtio_packed_ring_image_flavor_conflict(self): | |
| 18:06:50 | dvo-plv | """Ensure that packed_virtqueue_filter filter will reject resize | |
| 18:06:50 | dvo-plv | due to image property and flavor extra spec conflict | |
| 18:06:50 | dvo-plv | """ | |
| 18:06:50 | dvo-plv | # Decorate compute 1 and compute2 resource provider with trait. | |
| 18:06:52 | dvo-plv | rp_uuid1 = self._get_provider_uuid_by_host(self.compute1.host) | |
| 18:06:53 | dvo-plv | rp_uuid2 = self._get_provider_uuid_by_host(self.compute2.host) | |
| 18:06:55 | dvo-plv | self._set_provider_traits(rp_uuid1, ['COMPUTE_NET_VIRTIO_PACKED']) | |
| 18:06:57 | dvo-plv | self._set_provider_traits(rp_uuid2, ['COMPUTE_NET_VIRTIO_PACKED']) | |
| 18:06:59 | dvo-plv | # Create image with enabled Virtio Packed Ring property | |
| 18:07:01 | dvo-plv | image = self._create_image(metadata={'hw_virtio_packed_ring': 'true'}) | |
| 18:07:03 | dvo-plv | flavor_id = self._create_flavor(extra_spec={}) | |
| 18:07:05 | dvo-plv | # Create server using only image with property | |
| 18:07:07 | dvo-plv | server = self._create_server(flavor_id=flavor_id, | |
| 18:07:09 | dvo-plv | image_uuid=image['id'], | |
| 18:07:11 | dvo-plv | expected_state='ACTIVE', | |
| 18:07:13 | dvo-plv | networks='none') | |
| 18:07:16 | melwitt | please use pastebin for pastes 😆 | |
| 18:07:16 | melwitt | please use pastebin for pastes 😆 | |
| 18:07:17 | dvo-plv | server = self._wait_for_state_change(server, 'ACTIVE') | |
| 18:07:19 | dvo-plv | # Create flavor with disabled Virtio Packed Ring in the extra spec | |
| 18:07:21 | dvo-plv | new_flavor_id = self._create_flavor(extra_spec={'hw:virtio_packed_ring': 'false'}) | |
| 18:07:23 | dvo-plv | import rpdb | |
| 18:07:25 | dvo-plv | debugger = rpdb.Rpdb(port=12345) | |
| 18:07:27 | dvo-plv | debugger.set_trace() | |
| 18:07:29 | dvo-plv | ex = self.assertRaises(exception.FlavorImageConflict, self._resize_server, server, new_flavor_id) | |
| 18:09:09 | dvo-plv | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bD8BWCnpsUY8Rr7c6Hc7/ | |
| 18:10:01 | dvo-plv | I implemented this test here | |
| 18:10:05 | dvo-plv | (functional) stack@server72:/opt/stack/nova$ tox -e functional -- nova.tests.functional.test_servers.TraitsBasedSchedulingTest.test_resize_virtio_packed_ring_image_flavor_conflict | |
| 18:13:32 | melwitt | oh, right sorry 😣 bc this is a func test you will rather have to look at the returned http status code and message. sec | |
| 18:13:32 | melwitt | oh, right sorry 😣 bc this is a func test you will rather have to look at the returned http status code and message. sec | |
| 18:14:38 | dvo-plv | I saw this option in the other examples | |
| 18:14:39 | dvo-plv | self.assertEqual(403, ex.response.status_code) | |
| 18:14:50 | dvo-plv | but i can not get status code | |
| 18:17:27 | dvo-plv | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bOdkEFYHa3h24nBD5Ws1/ | |
| 18:17:30 | dvo-plv | this is test output | |
| 18:17:33 | melwitt | yeah, I think you can't use the _resize_server helper function in this case bc it will only return you the server object and bc it will wait for expected notifications https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/integrated_helpers.py#L530 which are not all going to happen in your case | |
| 18:17:54 | melwitt | since you're testing for an error condition | |
| 18:19:12 | melwitt | so you'll want to unwrap that i.e. call self.api.post_server_action directly, like this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/test_servers.py#L347 | |
| 18:19:22 | dvo-plv | I see, I will try to figure out without this wrapper, thank you | |
| 18:22:27 | melwitt | in the func tests the error exception will always be client.OpenStackApiException with the details encapsulated inside of it as it's imitating a rest API caller who will receive only an error from the client, not the internal exception that nova raised | |
| 18:25:19 | dvo-plv | okay, I believe it will help me, thank you | |
| 18:54:23 | dvo-plv | maybe I need something else for my case ? | |
| 18:54:59 | dvo-plv | I updated my test in this way | |
| 18:54:59 | dvo-plv | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bXTsHeFs7ct1qOUcLg1r/ | |
| 18:55:11 | dvo-plv | But i get this error testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: <bound method TestOpenStackClient.post_server_action of <nova.tests.functional.api.client.TestOpenStackClient object at 0x7f7b4fe13b50>> returned {} | |
| 18:55:33 | dvo-plv | (Pdb) self.api.post_server_action(server['id'], {'resize': {'flavorRef': new_flavor_id}}) | |
| 18:55:34 | dvo-plv | {} | |
| 19:00:24 | dvo-plv | It does not call class Fault(webob.exc.HTTPException) fault names | |
| 19:02:01 | melwitt | dvo-plv: that means that when you requested the resize you got a http status OK and you were expecting probably a 409 or? if your code is supposed to raise a conflict/409 to the rest API caller, there may be a bug with the exception not propagating up to the API | |
| 19:02:14 | melwitt | *you may have a bug | |
| 19:02:40 | dvo-plv | yes, look like it does not call status code from this class 409: "conflictingRequest", | |
| 19:02:47 | dvo-plv | class Fault(webob.exc.HTTPException): | |
| 19:04:50 | melwitt | yeah so you'll want to debug and trace from where you raise exception.FlavorImageConflict up to the API and find where it's not being propagated up | |
| 19:05:38 | melwitt | (again, if your intended behavior is a http 409 returned to the rest API caller) | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-30 | |||
| 08:13:50 | opendevreview | Yamato Tanaka proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Do exact-matching when finding one instance by name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/887268 | |
| 08:20:48 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1994983 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863416 | |
| 08:35:39 | opendevreview | Guillaume Espanel proposed openstack/nova master: Skip useless qemu-img convert when snapshotting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851854 | |
| 08:50:33 | opendevreview | Guillaume Espanel proposed openstack/nova master: Skip useless qemu-img convert when snapshotting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851854 | |
| 09:45:31 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds cleanup to remove dangling volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/878757 | |
| 09:52:09 | opendevreview | Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Unbind port when offloading a shelved instance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/887183 | |
| 12:10:04 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1994983 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863416 | |
| 13:44:02 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Log some InstanceNotFound exceptions from libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863665 | |
| 13:53:34 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1994983 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863416 | |
| 15:22:35 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Log some InstanceNotFound exceptions from libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863665 | |
| 17:38:57 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, Hello | |
| 17:39:04 | dvo-plv | are you here ? | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-01 | |||
| 13:58:31 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 | |
| 14:50:46 | opendevreview | Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Correctly reset instance task state in rebooting hard https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867832 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-02 | |||
| 08:08:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: database: Archive parent and child rows "trees" one at a time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/877056 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-03 | |||
| 08:27:37 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, Hello, are you around today ? | |
| 08:48:45 | dvo-plv | melwitt, Hello | |
| 09:41:55 | elodilles | if any core wants to do a trivial review for a bot generated patch, then here is a nice candidate: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/875100 | |
| 09:42:17 | elodilles | o:) (this should have merged months ago) | |
| 09:51:16 | sean-k-mooney | done | |
| 09:51:20 | sean-k-mooney | dvo-plv: o/ | |
| 09:52:34 | dvo-plv | I have a question regarding your comment with implementing functional tests | |
| 09:52:35 | dvo-plv | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075/14/nova/scheduler/request_filter.py#285 | |
| 09:53:13 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 09:53:26 | sean-k-mooney | whats specifically | |
| 09:54:37 | dvo-plv | I had rewrite this method to catch conflict in this way https://paste.opendev.org/show/bzaJaNk53E0OX9otfzzI/ | |
| 09:55:21 | dvo-plv | but during the process of creating http response i caught next error | |
| 09:55:22 | dvo-plv | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bd8oaO0EfYznOP5gkACa/ | |
| 09:55:27 | sean-k-mooney | why | |
| 09:56:18 | sean-k-mooney | oh the dict interfnace for nova/oslo verions objects has been deprecated for years | |
| 09:56:28 | sean-k-mooney | we started revmign all the supprot a while a go | |
| 09:56:29 | dvo-plv | to handle this issue in the test | |
| 09:57:00 | dvo-plv | so my question is, how should i properly solve this issue | |
| 09:57:21 | dvo-plv | implement this to_dict method, or leave it with a comment? | |
| 09:57:35 | sean-k-mooney | neither | |
| 09:57:41 | sean-k-mooney | why is to_dict being called | |
| 09:58:35 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure why you are doing the rewite | |
| 09:58:38 | sean-k-mooney | it should not be required | |
| 09:59:23 | dvo-plv | https://paste.opendev.org/show/blwO5HpbmFyV7UP3Gppk/ | |
| 09:59:50 | dvo-plv | this is how I impolemnted this test | |
| 10:00:13 | dvo-plv | and it fails as expected, so I add this mock @unittest.expectedFailure | |
| 10:00:32 | sean-k-mooney | we dont normaly use that decorator | |
| 10:00:41 | dvo-plv | But folks comfirmed that I should not use it here, because this mock only for bugs | |
| 10:00:58 | sean-k-mooney | we use an expict assert | |
| 10:01:47 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. self.assertRaises(<excption_class>, <function>, *args, **kwargs) | |