| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-23 | |||
| 11:47:25 | frickler | gibi: we are hitting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 on zed, anything we can help to make progress with that backport? | |
| 12:00:33 | gibi | frickler: I double checked that now and it seems it is OK so I +2d it | |
| 12:01:12 | sean-k-mooney | hehe i was about to do the same | |
| 12:01:38 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: so to answer your question appreeantly the answer is ping us :) | |
| 12:01:54 | frickler | oh, I was assuming the CI failure was because it was missing some other backport as basis. that was an easy one, then, thx | |
| 12:02:34 | sean-k-mooney | no the commit gibi asked about was merged when master was zed | |
| 12:15:23 | kashyap | Can anyone unpack this for me: qemu_6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.11 -- whta does the "2ubunut 6.11" mean? | |
| 12:15:47 | kashyap | The QEMU package version is 6.2; but what is "2ubuntu6.11"? Some "release" number? | |
| 12:17:02 | frickler | "+dfsg-2" usually is the debian version number and then "ubuntu6.11" is the 11th iteration of the 6th ubuntu patch of that | |
| 12:19:34 | kashyap | frickler: I see; thanks for the decryption; "11th iteration of the 6th ubuntu patch" -- means there really were 5 iterations of the patch that are searchable? | |
| 12:19:41 | kashyap | (Not that I want to find; but just curious) | |
| 12:20:19 | frickler | 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6 is the version that was released with Jammy, so according to stable policy all updates are patches of that | |
| 12:20:53 | frickler | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu has some of what you may want to look at | |
| 12:22:12 | frickler | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu5 is an older iteration from the development cycle it seems | |
| 12:24:16 | kashyap | Yeah, was looking there; thank you | |
| 12:24:23 | frickler | the main canonical developer is available on #ubuntu-server in libera if you have more specific questions | |
| 12:24:29 | kashyap | frickler: The reason I'm asking is - I'm about to bump libvirt/QEMU versions for Bobcat | |
| 12:24:45 | kashyap | Before that I just wanted to send an email to -discuss upstream list w/ it | |
| 12:25:04 | kashyap | The distros we care about are: Debian 12, Ubuntu Jammy (22.04), CentOS 9 Stream -- that's all, yeah? | |
| 12:25:38 | frickler | Not sure about debian 11 vs. 12, 12 may have been to late for bobcat | |
| 12:26:27 | frickler | we don't have it running in opendev yet, even less in devstack | |
| 12:26:33 | kashyap | Oh, so the upstream CI is testing w/ Debian 11? (Cc: sean-k-mooney --^) | |
| 12:26:44 | frickler | for now, yes | |
| 12:26:53 | kashyap | frickler: Good to know, so lemme check Debian 11 | |
| 12:27:00 | frickler | not sure if nova tests on debian at all, though | |
| 12:28:26 | sean-k-mooney | we dont currently but if we are advertisign the next version we are slecting for C and later | |
| 12:28:34 | sean-k-mooney | then we should look at debian 12 i think | |
| 12:28:49 | kashyap | frickler: So that's the Debian-11, right? For libvirt, at least - https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/libvirt | |
| 12:29:07 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Yeah, for next version definitely Bookworm (12) | |
| 12:29:35 | frickler | there's also https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye-backports/libvirt which I think could be acceptable | |
| 12:30:16 | frickler | iiuc zigo curates those | |
| 12:30:29 | sean-k-mooney | we basiclaly just need to do a servay of what is in current LTS/Stable to determin our next min libvirt | |
| 12:30:42 | kashyap | Yep | |
| 12:31:01 | kashyap | I'll send out an email something like this from the past - https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010907.html | |
| 12:31:06 | sean-k-mooney | the ones that kashyap will be updating to for this cycle are already known | |
| 12:31:14 | sean-k-mooney | and quite old | |
| 12:32:41 | kashyap | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L221,#L222 | |
| 12:33:12 | sean-k-mooney | so we will be movign to libvirt 7.0.0 and qemu 5.2.0 we likely should ue libvirt 8.0.0 as the new value for NEXT_MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION and | |
| 12:33:31 | kashyap | Yes, Jammy has: | |
| 12:33:33 | kashyap | libvirt-daemon: 8.0.0-1ubuntu7.5 -- https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy-updates/libvirt-daemon | |
| 12:33:37 | kashyap | And: | |
| 12:33:40 | kashyap | qemu-system-x86: 6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.11 -- https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/qemu-system-x86 | |
| 12:33:55 | kashyap | - CentOS Stream 9: libvirt-daemon-kvm-9.3.0-2.el9.x86_64.rpm - qemu-kvm-8.0.0-4.el9.x86_64.rpm | |
| 12:34:15 | sean-k-mooney | and proably qemu 6.2 | |
| 12:35:18 | sean-k-mooney | debainb and stream 9 both have 7.x but ubuntu 22.04 has 6.2 | |
| 12:36:59 | frickler | yes, that'll likely need to wait another cycle until 24.04 LTS is out | |
| 12:37:12 | sean-k-mooney | yep but i think thats fine | |
| 12:37:30 | kashyap | Then lowest common denominator is Jammy (22.04) here | |
| 12:37:38 | kashyap | So whatever is in Jammy is what we go w/ for the NEXT_MIN | |
| 12:38:20 | sean-k-mooney | we can annouch our next min version to to 22.04 deps for C/2024.1 and then in D revaluate what they should be after ubuntu 24.04 is out | |
| 12:38:33 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: yep | |
| 12:39:10 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Can you rephrase this, it's not clear to me: "... deps for C/2024.1" | |
| 12:39:47 | sean-k-mooney | well the earlist we could bump to the new min deps you will be propsoing is 2024.1 or the C release | |
| 12:40:26 | sean-k-mooney | we dont have to do that but its also the skip level update release that will be used to move between 22.04 and 24.04 | |
| 12:40:34 | kashyap | Oh, sure; we're only declaring the next_min; the bump only happens once C is out | |
| 12:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | so having our min version match what 22.04 ships is not a bad thing | |
| 12:41:02 | kashyap | Okay; I'll sumamrize in the email to list, then you/others can respond if you want anything to add | |
| 12:41:05 | kashyap | Just so it's recorded | |
| 12:41:46 | sean-k-mooney | ack it will also be recoded in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/libvirt-distro-support-matrix.html when your done too but never hurts to send it to the list | |
| 12:43:12 | kashyap | Yep :) | |
| 14:06:38 | opendevreview | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Pick next min libvirt / QEMU versions for "C" (2024) release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886825 | |
| 14:09:05 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: kashyap: sorry I was a bit afk, but tbc, I don't want that we should bump the minimum version for Bobcat, like sean said, rather on 2024.1 C | |
| 14:09:13 | zigo | frickler: sean-k-mooney: As far as I'm concerned, bullseye is dead, long live bookworm. The last version where I had support for Bullseye was Zed. | |
| 14:09:43 | zigo | So no problem if upgrading to libvirt 9... | |
| 14:10:43 | zigo | You guys can take whatever is in bookworm as what I can support minimum, and probably, also whatever's in bookworm-backports... | |
| 14:11:00 | zigo | If needed, I can even do the backports myself, if you ask early enough. | |
| 14:11:32 | kashyap | zigo: bauzas: Please comment here: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-June/034231.html | |
| 14:11:39 | kashyap | (Cc: sean-k-mooney, frickler) | |
| 14:11:45 | zigo | Experimental has 9.4.0, so probably it will be uploaded to Unstable soon, then migrate to Trixie, and then I can backport to Bookworm. | |
| 14:26:08 | kashyap | Thanks! | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-26 | |||
| 08:56:12 | bauzas | folks, I have a couple of review requests, is there anyone fancy to do it ? | |
| 08:57:19 | bauzas | first one is an easy peasy, it just adds some functional verification for cross_az_attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878948 | |
| 08:57:26 | bauzas | I need a second core ^ | |
| 08:58:25 | bauzas | second one is important for fixing a cpu power management issue, should be easy to review too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885352 | |
| 08:58:33 | bauzas | needs a second core as well ^ | |
| 08:59:05 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate ironic.peer_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883346 | |
| 08:59:39 | bauzas | third one is a specless bp change, simple for just adding a new cod-migrate policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881562 | |
| 08:59:57 | bauzas | so, who can help me ? :) | |
| 09:06:15 | gibi | bauzas: o/ remind me, did we discussed that specless on the meeting? | |
| 09:06:39 | bauzas | gibi: it was approved IIRC, but lemme double-check | |
| 09:06:56 | bauzas | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cold-migrate-to-host-policy correct it was | |
| 09:07:14 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 09:07:31 | bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-04-25-16.00.log.html#l-203 | |
| 09:07:56 | bauzas | gibi: thanks for doing this round of reviews, I know you're busy | |
| 09:08:21 | gibi | ohh sh*t now I have to do these reviews :D | |
| 09:14:14 | bauzas | gibi: nah, don't feel pressured | |
| 09:14:51 | bauzas | I'm thinking of creating an etherpad of code reviews either way :) | |
| 09:15:50 | gibi | done :D | |
| 09:15:57 | gibi | I mean with the reviews | |
| 09:23:24 | sean-k-mooney | i can review some of them while i wait for my dev env to deploy | |
| 09:26:03 | sean-k-mooney | there is one minor english issue in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881562/2/api-ref/source/servers-admin-action.inc and a slight nit later | |
| 09:26:07 | sean-k-mooney | but im +2 on it | |
| 09:26:19 | sean-k-mooney | i held +w in case you want to quickly fix it? | |
| 09:30:52 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sorry was working on updating some change | |
| 09:31:06 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sure, I can quickly respin for that english point | |
| 09:31:28 | sean-k-mooney | ack ill fast approve once its ready | |
| 09:31:28 | bauzas | should be better than a FUP | |
| 09:34:23 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a new policy for cold-migrate with host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881562 | |
| 09:34:31 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: gibi: ^ | |
| 10:02:11 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated AZ filter. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886779 | |