| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-05-02 | |||
| 16:55:32 | sean-k-mooney | we have that alredy | |
| 16:56:17 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/os-traits/blob/master/os_traits/compute/ephemeral.py#L18 and https://github.com/openstack/os-traits/blob/master/os_traits/compute/image.py#L28 | |
| 16:56:23 | sean-k-mooney | almost would work togather | |
| 16:56:43 | sean-k-mooney | btu we cant assume that epmeral encryption supprot for lux means nfs also works | |
| 16:56:58 | enriquetaso | LUKS_IN_QCOW is already a config option on Nova gibi ? | |
| 16:57:13 | sean-k-mooney | enriquetaso: not really | |
| 16:57:23 | sean-k-mooney | or not that im aware of | |
| 16:57:35 | sean-k-mooney | in the context of cinder | |
| 16:57:39 | gibi | enriquetaso: we are discussing creating a new placement trait to represent if a compute supports luks in qcow | |
| 16:57:54 | enriquetaso | gibi++ thanks | |
| 16:58:19 | bauzas | I honestly think we need to settle the dust | |
| 16:58:49 | bauzas | given the very short time we have left I hereby propose enriquetaso to create a spec and describe the feature | |
| 16:58:58 | bauzas | we could then chime on the upgrade concerns | |
| 16:59:06 | enriquetaso | okay u.u | |
| 16:59:15 | bauzas | enriquetaso: are you familiar with the spec process ? | |
| 16:59:26 | enriquetaso | is it too different from the cinder one? | |
| 16:59:39 | enriquetaso | bauzas, do you a have a doc? :P | |
| 16:59:55 | bauzas | enriquetaso: I can provide you pointers and more than that : guidance | |
| 17:00:11 | enriquetaso | sure bauzas | |
| 17:00:19 | bauzas | #agreed enriquetaso to provide a spec for this feature | |
| 17:00:33 | bauzas | #action bauzas to provide enriquetaso details on the spec process | |
| 17:00:40 | bauzas | we're on time | |
| 17:00:45 | bauzas | the agenda is done | |
| 17:00:56 | bauzas | so thanks all and see you next week | |
| 17:01:01 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 17:01:01 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue May 2 17:01:01 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 17:01:01 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-05-02-16.00.html | |
| 17:01:01 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-05-02-16.00.txt | |
| 17:01:01 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-05-02-16.00.log.html | |
| 17:01:06 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 17:01:07 | enriquetaso | thansk!! | |
| 17:01:09 | bauzas | enriquetaso: gimme a sec | |
| 17:01:16 | enriquetaso | sure bauzas | |
| 17:01:42 | bauzas | enriquetaso: so the spec process is quite simple : it's a doc | |
| 17:01:52 | bauzas | enriquetaso: we have a template you can reuse https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.2/approved/2023.2-template.html | |
| 17:02:41 | enriquetaso | looks good | |
| 17:02:45 | bauzas | enriquetaso: what you have to do is to write your own rst file based on that template and propose it for the approved/ directory | |
| 17:02:47 | bauzas | like https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+is:open | |
| 17:03:07 | enriquetaso | bauzas, do you remember when is the spec freeze? | |
| 17:03:25 | sean-k-mooney | its milestone 2 | |
| 17:03:38 | sean-k-mooney | so after the physical ptg at the end of july | |
| 17:03:51 | bauzas | enriquetaso: sure, look https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html#b-nova-spec-review-day | |
| 17:04:06 | bauzas | damn | |
| 17:04:06 | sean-k-mooney | july 6th actullly so start of july | |
| 17:04:20 | sean-k-mooney | https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html#b-nova-spec-freeze | |
| 17:04:32 | bauzas | yup, my link was wrong | |
| 17:05:17 | bauzas | enriquetaso: honestly, as you understood, most of the review process on that file will consist on us to agree on the upgrade concerns | |
| 17:05:37 | bauzas | which are not only the rolling upgrade concerns but also the fact that we need a recent libvirt | |
| 17:05:55 | bauzas | enriquetaso: you know our minimum libvirt versions we support, right? | |
| 17:06:21 | enriquetaso | sorry | |
| 17:06:25 | enriquetaso | it desconnect | |
| 17:06:27 | enriquetaso | i'm back | |
| 17:06:37 | bauzas | enriquetaso: no worries | |
| 17:06:48 | enriquetaso | but I think I have all the info i need sean-k-mooney bauzas | |
| 17:06:53 | bauzas | I was mentioning that most of the spec review will be about the upgrade concerns | |
| 17:07:06 | bauzas | enriquetaso: our current minimums for libvirt are https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L219-L222 | |
| 17:07:21 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: have you already proposed the libvirt min bump ? | |
| 17:08:42 | sean-k-mooney | no i asked kashyap to do that | |
| 17:08:53 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think they have had time to propose any patches | |
| 17:09:34 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Yes; it's on my list for this week | |
| 17:09:39 | bauzas | ack | |
| 17:09:45 | sean-k-mooney | if our currnt mins are enough this is simple as its just a min comptue service bump. if we have a min os-brick we can do that by raising or min os-brick | |
| 17:09:46 | kashyap | Right now I'm chasing down the kernel crash Dan pointed out earlier | |
| 17:10:19 | dansmith | can't do the min bump until I finish the ceph job stuff I think | |
| 17:10:50 | sean-k-mooney | it might be possibel but im ok waiting to m2 i guess | |
| 17:10:57 | sean-k-mooney | i would have preferd to do it at m1 | |
| 17:11:07 | sean-k-mooney | but i think ceph is a higher piority | |
| 17:12:27 | bauzas | I was under the impression that the nfs encryption was requiring a recent libvirt version but I could be wrong and mixing two things | |
| 17:15:26 | enriquetaso | mmmh, I'm not sure | |
| 17:15:51 | sean-k-mooney | i donthing think libvirt matters | |
| 17:15:59 | sean-k-mooney | but qemu-img might | |
| 17:16:03 | sean-k-mooney | and qemu | |
| 17:17:35 | enriquetaso | I can check and add this information on the spec if the feature need a min version of libvirt or qemu | |
| 17:18:55 | enriquetaso | okay, I'm going to disconnect now | |
| 17:19:01 | enriquetaso | thank you so much again | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-05-03 | |||
| 07:52:51 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Allow swap resize from non-zero to zero https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857339 | |
| 08:09:14 | dvo-plv_ | Hello, All Could you pelase help me with file naming | |
| 08:09:37 | dvo-plv_ | opt/stack/glance/releasenotes/notes/zed-milestone-3-3e38697ae4677a81.yaml where should I get hash ( zed-milestone-....yaml) in this file ? | |
| 08:31:22 | sean-k-mooney | its auto geneerated using a tool | |
| 08:31:48 | sean-k-mooney | tox -e venv reno new zed-milestone-3 | |
| 08:32:16 | sean-k-mooney | reno is the tool we use to create releasenotes | |
| 08:32:31 | sean-k-mooney | dvo-plv_:^ | |
| 08:37:30 | dvo-plv_ | thank you | |
| 11:33:03 | opendevreview | Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova master: Packed virtqueue support was added. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075 | |
| 11:53:15 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: fup: Print message logging uncaught nova-manage exceptions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/877334 | |
| 11:54:10 | opendevreview | Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: VirtIO PackedRing Configuration support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377 | |
| 12:15:15 | dvo-plv_ | gibi: I have resolved your comment at this bp https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377 | |
| 12:18:18 | gibi | dvo-plv_: look good to me | |
| 12:23:14 | opendevreview | Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: VirtIO PackedRing Configuration support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377 | |
| 12:38:29 | dvo-plv_ | I fixed pep8 validation. Should I do something more for further bp activities? | |
| 12:38:54 | sean-k-mooney | im just waitign for ci to report back im still happy with it so ill readd +2 once its green | |
| 12:39:08 | sean-k-mooney | oh its already repoted back | |
| 12:40:18 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: care to send it on its way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377 | |
| 12:43:03 | gibi | sean-k-mooney, dvo-plv_ : done | |
| 12:47:55 | dvo-plv_ | Great. So spec file is approved. Then we have to wait for code review ? https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fvirtio-packedring-configuration-support | |
| 12:58:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: VirtIO PackedRing Configuration support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377 | |
| 13:05:38 | sahid | quick question regarding host aggregate and AZ | |
| 13:06:55 | sahid | we have noticed that when we add a compute host, that one is always considered in the AZ nova (the one that is by default configured in default_avalibility_zone) | |
| 13:07:29 | sahid | it seems that if we don't want this behavior to happen, we have to first add the host to the correct aggregate and then start nova-compute service | |
| 13:08:09 | sahid | the problem is that, it seems not possible to add in an aggregate a host that has not been "registered" by a service like nova-compute, right? | |