| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-05-02 | |||
| 15:51:31 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "Debug Nova APIs call failures" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882052 | |
| 15:56:02 | bauzas | dansmith: melwitt: you may appreciate a quick review of the logging leak ^ | |
| 15:56:49 | bauzas | (did it on purpose before the meeting) | |
| 16:00:02 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:02 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 2 16:00:02 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:02 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:02 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:11 | bauzas | welcome everyone | |
| 16:00:19 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:00:25 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:00:42 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:00:50 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:54 | gibi | (on a spotty connection) | |
| 16:01:19 | dansmith | bauzas: got it | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | coolio, let's start | |
| 16:02:11 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:21 | bauzas | #info One Critical bug | |
| 16:02:30 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2012993 | |
| 16:02:35 | bauzas | shall be quickly reverted | |
| 16:02:45 | bauzas | and I'll propose backports as soon as it lands | |
| 16:03:25 | bauzas | not sure we need to discuss on it by now | |
| 16:03:38 | bauzas | so we can move on, unless people wanna know more about it | |
| 16:04:07 | sean-k-mooney | i have +w'ed it so its on its way | |
| 16:04:21 | bauzas | yup, and as you wrote, two backports are planned | |
| 16:04:26 | bauzas | down to 2023.1 and Zed | |
| 16:04:45 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:04:56 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 20 new untriaged bugs (+3 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:05:16 | bauzas | artom: I assume you didn't had a lot of time for spinning around those bugs ? | |
| 16:05:29 | bauzas | again, no worries | |
| 16:05:32 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:05:53 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:06:08 | bauzas | Uggla: you're the next on the list, happy to axe some of the bugs ? | |
| 16:06:19 | artom | bauzas, trying to do a few now | |
| 16:06:28 | bauzas | cool, no rush | |
| 16:06:36 | Uggla | bauzas, yep ok for me. | |
| 16:06:43 | bauzas | thanbks | |
| 16:06:45 | artom | For https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2018172 I think we need kashyap to weigh in, 'virtio' may not be a thing in RHEL 9.1? | |
| 16:06:51 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to Uggla | |
| 16:06:55 | bauzas | artom: looking | |
| 16:07:01 | dansmith | uh, what | |
| 16:07:03 | artom | Or maybe just close immediately and direct them to a RHEL... thing | |
| 16:07:07 | kashyap | artom: Wait; it's impossible "virtio" can't be a thing in RHEL9.1. /me looks | |
| 16:07:21 | dansmith | hah, yeah | |
| 16:07:27 | dansmith | but looks like maybe just a particular virtio video model/ | |
| 16:07:30 | bauzas | that's a libvirt exception | |
| 16:07:42 | bauzas | so, IMHO invalid | |
| 16:07:50 | bauzas | (for the project) | |
| 16:08:23 | artom | Right, but before that I'd like to confirm that Nova is doing the right thing | |
| 16:08:46 | dansmith | is the video model an extra spec/ | |
| 16:08:50 | opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/nova master: Nova to honor "cross_az_attach" during server(VM) migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864760 | |
| 16:09:10 | artom | I guess I'm going about it backwards - it's just an easier thing to check initially, RHEL 9.1 support for virtio video | |
| 16:09:12 | artom | dansmith, yeah | |
| 16:09:14 | sean-k-mooney | its an image property | |
| 16:09:19 | bauzas | yeah | |
| 16:09:41 | dansmith | is virtio the only option there or is it like virtio plus a device model name/ | |
| 16:09:47 | sean-k-mooney | virtio shoudl be a thing in rhel9 | |
| 16:09:48 | bauzas | we just try to generate a domain which is badly incorrect given the image metadata | |
| 16:09:49 | dansmith | just wondering if they're specifying the wrong thing | |
| 16:09:56 | sean-k-mooney | technially it maps to virtio-gpu | |
| 16:10:05 | bauzas | that rings a bell to me | |
| 16:10:39 | bauzas | anyway, I'd propose to punt this bug today by asking the reporter its flavor and image | |
| 16:10:57 | opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/nova master: Nova to honor "cross_az_attach" during server(VM) migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864760 | |
| 16:11:02 | dansmith | why are we even discussing this on the meeting? | |
| 16:11:43 | bauzas | I guess because artom wanted to triage it | |
| 16:11:48 | bauzas | so please => incomplete it | |
| 16:11:49 | artom | I just wanted to ping kashyap on it, is all | |
| 16:11:49 | sean-k-mooney | i guess it was a bug artom tought whoudl be brougt to our attention based on the triage | |
| 16:11:57 | bauzas | and ask for the image metadata | |
| 16:12:11 | kashyap | artom: We can sort it out off-meeting :) Thx! | |
| 16:12:25 | sean-k-mooney | artom: i have been using hw_video_model=virtio for years so its valid for sure | |
| 16:12:48 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we can move on | |
| 16:12:56 | kashyap | (Yeah; plain "virtio" must work) | |
| 16:13:20 | bauzas | moving on so | |
| 16:13:36 | kashyap | Is it still on-topic to discuss a CirrOS seg-fault that dansmith pointed out earlier? | |
| 16:13:41 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:13:48 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:13:53 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures | |
| 16:14:04 | bauzas | there it is time to discuss gate failures now | |
| 16:14:26 | bauzas | dansmith: shoot the good news and the bad ones if you have | |
| 16:14:49 | dansmith | tldr is that I have got the ceph job moved to jammy and cephadm and it's working finally, and: | |
| 16:15:10 | dansmith | that I found a bunch of places where we thought we were requiring SSHABLE before volume activities where it was being silently ignored | |
| 16:15:17 | dansmith | basically what gibi asserted | |
| 16:15:28 | dansmith | so I've got a stack of tempest patches (and cinder-tempest-plugin) to not only fix those, | |
| 16:15:51 | dansmith | but also sanity check and raise an error if someone asks for SSHABLE but without the requisite extra stuff to actually honor it | |
| 16:16:13 | dansmith | that helps us pass the ceph job in the new config but will also likely help improve volume failures in the other jobs | |
| 16:16:37 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:16:43 | bauzas | thanks for the janitorisation | |
| 16:16:57 | gibi | dansmith: awesome | |
| 16:17:06 | gibi | thank you | |
| 16:17:16 | bauzas | which patches shall be looked at for people who care ? | |
| 16:17:24 | dansmith | it's been a lot of work and frustration, but happy to see it becoming fruitful | |
| 16:17:36 | dansmith | well, no patches to nova, but I can get you a link, hang on | |
| 16:17:56 | gmann | this one #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:sshable-volume-tests | |
| 16:18:00 | dansmith | this stack on tempest: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/881925 | |
| 16:18:14 | dansmith | and this one against cinder-tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/881764 | |
| 16:18:30 | dansmith | the nova patch I have up is a DNM just to test our job with that full stack, but we don't need to merge anything | |
| 16:18:55 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:sshable-volume-tests Tempest patches that add more ssh checks for volume-related tests | |
| 16:19:11 | bauzas | cool excellent, thanks a lot dansmith for this hard work | |
| 16:19:32 | bauzas | that's noted. | |
| 16:19:50 | bauzas | any other CI failure to relate or mention ? | |