Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-02-28
10:21:47 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.db/+/875627 that will fix the annoying warnings you've been seeing in the functional tests
10:37:16 sean-k-mooney nice unfortuhnetly that wont be in 2023.1 at this point
10:37:50 stephenfin yeah, we'll have to backport it
10:40:13 sean-k-mooney i assume once we cut rc1 tomrrow you would like your SQLA2.0 seriese to land sooner rather then later
10:40:39 sean-k-mooney i.e. droping the legacy migration and the other patches you have up
10:40:52 stephenfin yes, please. get it in early
10:41:06 sean-k-mooney ya that is what i was thinking
10:41:33 sean-k-mooney ill try and do a pass of it next week
10:43:24 sean-k-mooney conf.get_location(key, group=group.name).location ==
10:43:26 sean-k-mooney cfg.Locations.opt_default
10:43:36 sean-k-mooney so i tought here was a cleaner way to do that
10:44:03 sean-k-mooney either usign in or a method to check it the option was set from the default
10:44:32 stephenfin There could be. I'm simply not aware of it if so
10:45:11 sean-k-mooney i have not used it personally but i vaguely recall it form the docs
10:45:29 sean-k-mooney the patch looks fine to me but i just want to check if that is a thing quickly
10:46:42 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ok no you are doing it the way you are ment too https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.config/latest/reference/locations.html
10:46:47 sean-k-mooney that is what i was recalling
10:47:01 sean-k-mooney i tought there was an is_default() or similar
10:47:22 stephenfin yeah, I explicitly wanted to raise a warning if the application (i.e. nova) was setting it too
10:47:28 stephenfin since that's still wrong
10:47:42 sean-k-mooney actully you could use is_user_controlled
10:48:11 sean-k-mooney ah
10:48:23 sean-k-mooney ok so you want to also support set_default and set_override
10:48:37 sean-k-mooney so is_user_controlled is not correct
10:48:38 stephenfin I want to also raise for the two of those, yes
10:48:43 stephenfin exactly
10:50:58 sean-k-mooney cool captured that in the review an dset Backport-Candidate on it
10:52:46 sean-k-mooney im debating if having Backport-Candidate would be useful for nova et al
10:53:02 sean-k-mooney is it useful for oslo?
10:54:13 stephenfin not really, no
10:54:57 sean-k-mooney ingeneral if the patch is not intentioanlly written to be backportable it wont be
10:54:59 stephenfin The biggest problem is lack of reviewers, not lack of things to review. Also, we don't tend to make many changes nowadays so there aren't many backports
10:55:30 sean-k-mooney so if its just set after the fact its probaly less useful
10:55:38 sean-k-mooney ya reviews are a problem everywhere
10:55:59 sean-k-mooney although oslo with all its repos proably have it wrose then most
11:46:16 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Have schema for 'lock' action be applied to all microversions. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875653
13:00:34 opendevreview Samuel Kunkel proposed openstack/nova master: fix: amd-sev handle missing img properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874264
13:03:18 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Delegate OVS plug to os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790447
13:07:21 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Delegate OVS plug to os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790447
13:09:20 ratailor_ #openstack-nova can I get reviews for these patches https://review.opendev.org/q/Ia738a0972b050f549f446c85171d3f33e60ada4f and https://review.opendev.org/q/Id4c8c5f3b32985ac7d3d7c833b82e0876f7367c1 ?
13:20:53 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Have schema for 'lock' action be applied to all microversions. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875653
13:21:23 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Have schema for 'lock' action be applied to all microversions. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875653
13:43:42 lowercase stephenfin: I looked into our next enviornment, which also contains a build_requests table with no columns.
13:43:52 lowercase in an identical state to the dev
13:45:33 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Delegate OVS plug to os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790447
13:46:01 lowercase and i just checked one of my production databases, also include a build_requests in the same state. select * from build_requests; Empty set (0.000 sec)
13:52:30 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Test aborting queued live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845748
13:52:41 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845753
13:52:48 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845754
13:59:49 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Update to the PTL guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875730
14:05:09 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Update to the PTL guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875730
14:46:00 bauzas elodilles: I'm done with the meeting wikipage, feel free to amend it anytime you want
14:47:55 elodilles bauzas: ack, thanks
14:48:15 elodilles bauzas: well, actually, it is done o:)
14:48:35 elodilles no need to update :X
14:48:51 bauzas elodilles: I'll name you Barry Allen
14:50:53 elodilles just a sec, have to google this. :S
14:51:00 dansmith bauzas: why remove the grenade-slip-level job for bobcat? it's not required, but we might as well keep it.. is it because it hasn't yet been updated for zed->bobcat?
14:54:00 bauzas dansmith: good question I was about getting a coffee before pinging you to ask you what you would prefer
14:54:27 dansmith personally I'd rather leave it in place as much as we can, as I think it just adds extra coverage
14:54:39 dansmith however, I need to look at it again,
14:54:59 bauzas dansmith: okay, so we would leave non-voting in a non-SLURP branch and just make it voting after Bobcat RC1 ?
14:55:14 dansmith as it might be that we need to change it so that it tests the right releases, which we can't do until after rc of course
14:55:34 dansmith I would leave it voting personally
14:55:49 bauzas even for like B>D ?
14:56:10 dansmith yeah, I mean,
14:56:24 dansmith are you thinking we'll run into issues with deprecations?
14:56:50 dansmith unless it's something specifically in that test I think we'll be okay.. we've had it enabled for a while and never found any problems in nova (IIRC)
14:56:52 bauzas well,
14:57:26 bauzas I'm rather thinking about for example when we remove a RPC compat code
14:58:13 dansmith this isn't a live test, so I don't think that will matter
14:58:17 bauzas like for when removing https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/manager.py#L11306
15:00:42 bauzas anyway, if you prefer to continue the job, we could be just making it to voting, and in case after C** RC1, if we see it has some problem, then we could make it non-voting
15:01:34 bauzas I mean, make it voting after Bobcat RC1, and leave it voting even after C* RC1 unless we see a problem
15:02:11 dansmith sure, I mean, during bobcat it doesn't *have* to be voting, but I think it would be a good idea
15:02:28 dansmith at least we'll notice what we're breaking and we can make it n-v if that's what we need to proceed
15:04:29 sean-k-mooney as long as it moves to 22.04 form 20.04 so we can drop focal testing im ok with that
15:05:45 sean-k-mooney i think we need that change to bump our min libvirt version which we skipped doing now for a few releases
15:05:54 sean-k-mooney so we should do it in bobcat and do it early
15:06:29 stephenfin lowercase: I assume you mean no rows? There should be columns. The question is if they're the columns we're expecting, i.e. `vm_state`
15:06:32 dansmith ack, I think we should be able to switch it to zed->bobcat and 22.04 as soon as bobcat opens.. gmann you okay with that?
15:08:16 bauzas bobcat will open in 2 days :)
15:09:01 lowercase show tables; -> build_requests is present. select * from build_requests ; -> Empty set (0.001 sec) show full columns from build_requests ; -> there are about 23 columns there from a quick count.
15:09:25 dansmith bauzas: I was going to say it actually matters when the relevant projects have branches, but that's the grenade holdup.. since this is two back, we should be able to do it immediately, yeah
15:10:10 dansmith bauzas: the only concern would be people using the job to merge things on their rc branches that need coverage.. but I think we're going to need a grenade-skip-level-previous (or something) job anyway to keep stable happy, so maybe this is the time to practice that
15:10:36 bauzas hmmm
15:11:06 lowercase stephenfin: see previous response
15:12:27 stephenfin lowercase: can you dump the output of 'describe build_requests;' to a pastebin?
15:12:33 bauzas dansmith: have you seen my service version change ? We shouldn't longer need to use this https://github.com/openstack/grenade/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L401
15:13:04 stephenfin lowercase: and 'select * from alembic_version;'
15:13:19 dansmith bauzas: something other than 875621?
15:13:27 stephenfin lowercase: This is for the next environment, of course
15:13:54 bauzas dansmith: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932
15:13:58 lowercase stephenfin: this is my qa cluster that is on xena, and is not being upgraded to yoga yet. d67eeaabee36
15:15:06 dansmith bauzas: ah, yeah I had but I didn't connect the dots
15:15:44 bauzas dansmith: so are you agreeing on the change ? (like, just continuing to support Yoga)
15:15:54 stephenfin lowercase: Cool, so alembic_version looks correct. Now to ensure that the columns that migration b30f573d3377 removes are present there, as expected (the 'describe' command)
15:16:27 bauzas dansmith: and just after Antelope RC1, bumping the service version to Antelope
15:16:40 dansmith bauzas: yeah I mean, I think I'm okay with that.. the change doesn't really change anything (other than get ready for the future with the missing service versions) right?
15:17:10 lowercase stephenfin: https://paste.centos.org/view/529a12ed

Earlier   Later