| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-02-15 | |||
| 09:14:31 | gibi | one thing we can do before bump the ssh timeout is to add "os-getConsoleOutput" nova API call to tempest when ssh timeouts to see the guest log at that point in time | |
| 09:14:44 | bauzas | gibi: I dunno what happens but yeah, the discover happens way earlier than the ssh timeout AFAICU | |
| 09:15:22 | bauzas | or | |
| 09:15:53 | bauzas | between the last console timestamp that says [12...] and the 3rd discover, then 2min15s lasted | |
| 09:17:52 | bauzas | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cirros/+bug/1273159 | |
| 09:18:08 | bauzas | "It only sends up to 3 DHCP discover packets with a 60 second pause between." :) | |
| 09:18:21 | bauzas | so yeah, that explains | |
| 09:18:57 | bauzas | that explains why we don't see the dhcp lease failing, but that doesn't explain why after 2mins, the dhcp server wasn't providing a lease | |
| 09:25:07 | gibi_ | bauzas: this was the last thing I saw | |
| 09:25:08 | gibi_ | 10:18 < bauzas> so yeah, that explains | |
| 09:25:33 | bauzas | (10:18:57) bauzas: that explains why we don't see the dhcp lease failing, but that doesn't explain why after 2mins, the dhcp server wasn't providing a lease | |
| 09:25:50 | gibi_ | yeah | |
| 09:26:05 | gibi_ | so it might be a neutron dhcp issue | |
| 09:26:17 | bauzas | gibi: I'm inclined to say that increasing the ssh timeout wouldn't help | |
| 09:26:49 | gibi_ | bauzas: it might prove that the 3rd discover fails too and then udhcp gives up | |
| 09:27:03 | gibi_ | but I agree that it is unlikely that the 3rd discover will succeed | |
| 09:27:16 | gibi_ | (except if this is a slow worker node situation) | |
| 09:28:00 | bauzas | well | |
| 09:28:30 | bauzas | I wouldn't say that a ssh connection successful after 3 mins would be a good user experience | |
| 09:28:46 | bauzas | we asked to bind the port way earlier | |
| 09:29:07 | bauzas | and the network cache was updated | |
| 09:29:15 | bauzas | so this doesn't look a vif plugging issue | |
| 09:29:29 | bauzas | gibi: welcome back :) | |
| 09:29:40 | bauzas | anyway, I gonna drop my investigations | |
| 09:29:54 | bauzas | we identified the problem | |
| 09:30:12 | bauzas | now we now it can somehow be kinda-related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2006467 | |
| 09:32:35 | gibi_ | bauzas: would it make sense to ping #openstack-neutron with ^^ | |
| 09:33:14 | bauzas | gibi_: seems to me a good thing to do + adding neutron to the list of projects impacted by that bug | |
| 09:43:38 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Amend FQDN in hostname spec to reflect implementation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/872422 | |
| 10:15:12 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: its not really a openstack bug is it | |
| 10:15:39 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: like its not a nova bug we have nothing to do with dhcp | |
| 10:16:05 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: perhaps we can finally bump the verion of cirros in devstack | |
| 10:16:20 | sean-k-mooney | to a 6.x version | |
| 10:16:31 | sean-k-mooney | that should fix some of the kernel panics we see too | |
| 10:16:56 | stephenfin | Do folks think dropping the legacy migrations and fully supporting SQLA 2.0 is viable during the A cycle? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872428/ | |
| 10:17:22 | sean-k-mooney | you mean by tommorow right | |
| 10:17:37 | stephenfin | oof, I thought we had longer for services | |
| 10:17:54 | stephenfin | then I guess that answers my question 0:) | |
| 10:17:54 | sean-k-mooney | i saw you submit that and also use sdk seriese | |
| 10:18:28 | sean-k-mooney | well we might be able too but i have not looked at the patch yet | |
| 10:18:32 | stephenfin | yeah, the use SDK series is a nice-to-have and highlights some SDK gaps. This one's a _little_ more urgent | |
| 10:18:52 | bauzas | stephenfin: while I understand your concern, I'm afraid of merging it 2 days before FF, given the huge number of CI failures we havbe | |
| 10:18:55 | sean-k-mooney | i skimed it when you first submitted it and the second patch failed zuul | |
| 10:19:04 | sean-k-mooney | look liek it passed after a recheck | |
| 10:19:24 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: why | |
| 10:19:37 | sean-k-mooney | this code is not used currently | |
| 10:20:15 | sean-k-mooney | if i recall correctly its only used if your coming form pre train | |
| 10:20:40 | sean-k-mooney | actully pre wallaby based on the commit message | |
| 10:21:04 | sean-k-mooney | so thsi wont impact any ci jobs | |
| 10:21:31 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: for what its worth we can land them early after RC1 if we dont land them now | |
| 10:21:52 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: because we already have a lot of changes to be merged | |
| 10:22:04 | bauzas | and I'm done with the CI failures | |
| 10:22:07 | stephenfin | yeah, early in RC1 would work also. We just don't want to drag our feet on this. | |
| 10:22:56 | sean-k-mooney | well i ment after RC1 so in bobcat | |
| 10:23:17 | sean-k-mooney | i would be ok with proceedign with this in Antelope however | |
| 10:23:26 | sean-k-mooney | if ci does not object | |
| 10:25:00 | sean-k-mooney | what is the sate of ci in general currently. has the tempest issue been fixed | |
| 10:25:09 | bauzas | yes | |
| 10:25:17 | bauzas | but now we also have other issues | |
| 10:29:16 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845754 | |
| 10:30:11 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: im +2 on both of those if others care to review | |
| 10:30:30 | sean-k-mooney | otherwise we can try and land it again in 2 weeks or so | |
| 11:35:04 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873584 just there so we can merge it before RC1 or have ye found the issue in the tests? | |
| 11:35:26 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we merged it yesterday | |
| 11:35:36 | bauzas | I mean the logging patch | |
| 11:35:47 | bauzas | so I'd prefer to keep it logging for more than one day | |
| 11:37:29 | sean-k-mooney | ack i was just asking if they issue had been found or not | |
| 11:37:35 | opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix case-sensitivity for metadata keys https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873901 | |
| 11:37:42 | sean-k-mooney | we can leave it there for a week or so until we get clsoe to rc1 | |
| 12:25:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: cpu: interfaces for managing state and governor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868236 | |
| 13:50:08 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864730 | |
| 14:09:07 | bauzas | gibi: another interesting usual suspect kinda related https://ae59d1e8526fa7671728-240e4b572b6f89b26c1b0e70b1c00c17.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/872413/3/check/nova-multi-cell/5e89e48/testr_results.html | |
| 14:09:25 | bauzas | somethink looks wrong to me with the userplane | |
| 14:09:41 | bauzas | this time, we got a lease directly | |
| 14:09:49 | bauzas | but when adding the route, it failed | |
| 14:10:07 | bauzas | and when calling the metadata API, we got a failure | |
| 14:25:26 | bauzas | gibi: oh, ralonsoh did an update on the udhcpc bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/871272 | |
| 14:26:18 | bauzas | I guess we need to update our zuul config, lemme check | |
| 14:26:28 | gibi | bauzas: I don't know if the root of this is the warning in the route add, or that just a red herring and we have a failure in metadata request handling in neutron or in nova | |
| 14:26:59 | bauzas | the 'route add default gw' command failed | |
| 14:27:08 | gibi | with a WARN :D | |
| 14:27:08 | bauzas | so basically there is no default route set | |
| 14:27:21 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: that happens somethimes | |
| 14:27:24 | sean-k-mooney | its normal | |
| 14:27:28 | bauzas | that's why I guess the call to the metadata API is failing | |
| 14:27:39 | bauzas | since the route to the network isn't told | |
| 14:27:56 | sean-k-mooney | adding the default route often fails because its already there | |
| 14:28:00 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'm just checking the 'normality' in logsearch | |
| 14:28:14 | bauzas | route: SIOCADDRT: File exists WARN: failed: route add -net "0.0.0.0/0" gw "10.1.0.1" | |
| 14:28:15 | sean-k-mooney | i litrally have been seeing that for years | |
| 14:28:28 | bauzas | technically there is indeed a default route set | |
| 14:28:45 | bauzas | because of the 'file exists' | |
| 14:29:52 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think this is related | |
| 14:30:15 | sean-k-mooney | as i said im used to seeing htat warning. its possible however i think its unlikely | |
| 14:30:42 | bauzas | well, OK | |
| 14:31:03 | bauzas | I already spent my month investigating | |
| 14:31:26 | bauzas | and we still have the udhcpc fix to merge, working on it | |
| 14:42:45 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: upgrade nova-next to use dhcpcd client w/ cirros-0.6.1 guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873934 | |
| 14:42:57 | bauzas | gibi: sean-k-mooney: ralonsoh: reviews appreciated ^ | |
| 14:44:03 | ralonsoh | let me check | |