| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-02-10 | |||
| 14:03:47 | bauzas | we're constructing a pile of cards | |
| 14:04:14 | gibi | yeah | |
| 14:04:21 | bauzas | wait | |
| 14:04:23 | bauzas | https://effe4ed80a91c92fc386-ef4309a852fb3e3584cdcb1adbb4ea34.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/872065/4/check/cross-nova-py310/da20743/testr_results.html | |
| 14:04:49 | bauzas | 2023-02-07 15:57:42,351 ERROR [nova.privsep.utils] Error on '.' while checking direct I/O: '' | |
| 14:04:59 | bauzas | I have no idea about what would cause this | |
| 14:05:07 | gibi | I did not looked into that failure | |
| 14:05:31 | bauzas | after 10 years, I still discover new areas in Nov | |
| 14:07:01 | bauzas | gibi: ouch, see this ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/872065/4/upper-constraints.txt#207 | |
| 14:08:00 | gibi | I counted > 20 major bumps in that patch but I did not noticed that libvirt-python is one of them | |
| 14:08:04 | gibi | so shit++ | |
| 14:08:21 | gibi | I don't like that big bump patch | |
| 14:08:26 | gibi | it moves to many things at once | |
| 14:08:29 | gibi | too close to RC1 | |
| 14:09:14 | kashyap | gibi: It's not merged yet, right | |
| 14:09:25 | kashyap | gibi: Yeah, I just see the 'libvirt-python' bump sneaked in there | |
| 14:09:34 | gibi | kashyap: right, it is failed on CI | |
| 14:09:58 | gibi | kashyap: but even if it clears CI I smell trouble | |
| 14:10:09 | kashyap | Yeah, I'm adding a quick review comment | |
| 14:11:52 | bauzas | I made a clear statement already | |
| 14:12:28 | bauzas | gibi: we shouldn't wait for this massive reqs update for os-traits | |
| 14:12:34 | kashyap | bauzas: Aaah, I missed your comment | |
| 14:12:47 | gibi | bauzas: we can try to propose a separate bump that only moves os-traits | |
| 14:12:50 | bauzas | gibi: want me to propose some u-c update for os-traits ? | |
| 14:12:53 | kashyap | Ah, we wrote the comment at the same moment (3:11 PM) | |
| 14:13:01 | gibi | bauzas: yeah, go ahead, I can +1 it | |
| 14:13:05 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/872065/4/upper-constraints.txt#361 | |
| 14:13:17 | bauzas | gibi: fwiw, os-traits isn't upgraded in this patch | |
| 14:13:35 | gibi | bauzas: yeah that patch wasn't regenerated since os-traits 2.10 landed | |
| 14:13:50 | gibi | I think it will be regenerated eventually but we don't need to wait for it | |
| 14:13:50 | bauzas | on it then | |
| 14:13:54 | gibi | thanks | |
| 14:14:16 | gibi | once we have 2.10 in global reqs we need a bump in placement too as we want to release placement with the latest os-traits | |
| 14:15:27 | bauzas | why isn't the bot proposing a new release ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/854821 | |
| 14:16:58 | gibi | bauzas: maybe because it is waiting for the other bump to land? | |
| 14:17:00 | gibi | I'm not sure | |
| 14:17:02 | gibi | elodilles: ^^ | |
| 14:19:40 | gibi | bauzas: the spice image compression patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828675 is nicely written and easy to review. I | |
| 14:19:43 | gibi | I | |
| 14:19:45 | gibi | I | |
| 14:19:45 | gibi | I'm +2 on it | |
| 14:19:55 | gibi | (too much coffee...) | |
| 14:20:11 | bauzas | gibi: ok, then, I'll take a look on it | |
| 14:20:22 | gibi | I think it is an easy win :) | |
| 14:20:29 | bauzas | I like easy wins | |
| 14:20:55 | bauzas | our antelope release will have bad numbers so anything that helps to improve our numbers is good :) | |
| 14:22:52 | gibi | and I jumped the gun on the manila series regarding the os-traits release. The manial series only needs os-traits 2.8.0 so that is OK. So only the scaphandre and the max_phy_bits series are blocked on os-traits 2.10.0 | |
| 14:23:43 | bauzas | that is correct | |
| 14:23:59 | bauzas | and since the scaphandre series actually relies on manila... | |
| 14:24:17 | bauzas | well, on virtiofs support coming from the manila series... | |
| 14:24:47 | gibi | yeah | |
| 14:28:05 | bauzas | gibi: as a wrap-up | |
| 14:28:13 | bauzas | I just discussed with the releases team | |
| 14:28:29 | bauzas | and the releases post-merge jobs are failing since Feb3 | |
| 14:29:00 | bauzas | in other words, os-vif and os-traits aren't formally released yet | |
| 14:29:08 | bauzas | despite the releases patch got merged | |
| 14:40:04 | gibi | ohh nice | |
| 14:46:10 | gibi | I see https://pypi.org/project/os-traits/ only has 2.9.0 | |
| 14:47:20 | bauzas | gibi: join the openstack-releases channel if you wanna get some fun | |
| 14:47:44 | gibi | I'm in :) but don't need more fun | |
| 15:24:16 | bauzas | gibi: +Wd the image compression patch | |
| 15:24:18 | bauzas | yay | |
| 15:24:53 | gibi | it won't land due to the ceph job block but still it is an achievement \o/ | |
| 15:28:27 | bauzas | yeah, and I'll chase the rechecks | |
| 15:50:46 | dansmith | I think zuul is down | |
| 15:52:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Bump microversion to 2.95 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/872418 | |
| 15:54:47 | dansmith | s'back | |
| 15:56:24 | bauzas | dansmith: there were problems with post-release pipelines | |
| 15:56:32 | bauzas | hence the zuul restart | |
| 15:56:41 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 15:58:07 | bauzas | dansmith: gmann: we'll get yet another failure for your tempest image fix https://zuul.openstack.org/status#873300 | |
| 15:58:17 | dansmith | yep | |
| 15:58:26 | opendevreview | Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Look for cpu controller on cgroups v2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873127 | |
| 16:02:55 | bauzas | melwitt: could you please remove your -2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863177 (the ironic-vnc-console blueprint got accepted for the cycle) | |
| 16:06:41 | bauzas | gibi: I think we rounded on all the possible blueprints we have | |
| 16:07:13 | gibi | bauzas: yeah, I don't have brainpower to look at the ironic vnc one | |
| 16:07:16 | bauzas | we can try to take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863177 possibly but sounds a bit optimistic | |
| 16:07:29 | gibi | yeah | |
| 16:08:14 | bauzas | gmann: planning to progress on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594 ? | |
| 16:08:26 | gibi | I think I won't start anything big any more today but I'm still around for a bit if specific review is needed | |
| 16:08:34 | bauzas | me too, I'm done for today | |
| 16:08:50 | bauzas | I'll start reviewing the maxphysnet series today, but I'm not an expert in this | |
| 16:09:01 | bauzas | s//maxphysaddr | |
| 16:10:05 | gibi | ohh that one I can take a look | |
| 16:10:08 | gibi | I reviewd the spec there | |
| 16:12:43 | spatel | sean-k-mooney Hi, I have a question related HugePages, currently i am running SRIOV + CPU pinning + HugePages | |
| 16:13:27 | spatel | Lets say i don't want to use HugePages. Does that possible? | |
| 16:13:41 | bauzas | spatel: sean-k-mooney is on PTO until wed | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | lemme try to answer you | |
| 16:14:15 | bauzas | spatel: yes, it's possible to have CPU pinning without huge pages | |
| 16:14:26 | bauzas | but I guess you have running workloads ? | |
| 16:15:00 | spatel | Yes | |
| 16:15:39 | spatel | I am deploying new cloud and planning to not use HugePage. We had some incident in past related memory cause strange issue. | |
| 16:15:43 | bauzas | ok, so, do you want to tune off hugepages for all your computes but a subset ? | |
| 16:15:53 | bauzas | ah | |
| 16:16:00 | spatel | New cloud with no HugePage at all.. | |
| 16:16:17 | bauzas | ok, then you just need to use flavors that don't request hugepages | |
| 16:16:37 | spatel | This is what i have currently in my cloud - intel_iommu=on iommu=pt hugepagesz=2M hugepages=30000 transparent_hugepage=never | |
| 16:16:57 | spatel | Thinking to remove hugepages and change flavor | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/cpu-topologies.html | |