Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-01-23
14:43:37 kashyap Thanks for bearing with me!
14:50:14 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: demo 1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871480
14:50:14 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: demo 2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871481
14:52:07 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: demo 2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871481
14:52:07 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: demo 1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871480
14:52:08 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: demo middle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871482
15:58:59 sahid o/ - quick question I have to rebase on conflict a micro-version change, I have some tests failing but struggling to find the issue https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/RNw8yxQtj6/
15:59:05 sahid any idea that can help me?
16:01:34 sahid Template: ^2.95$
16:01:36 sahid Sample: 2.94
16:01:49 sahid I don't see where this 2.94 is comming from
16:57:55 bauzas sahid: are you sure you updated all your API change files so it now uses 2.95 ?
17:04:37 bauzas sahid: commented your patch
17:34:03 sahid bauzas: well I want to say yes but I have probably missed something :-)
17:34:10 sahid I will double check
17:34:45 bauzas sahid: I tried to quick looked at the test to understand why it autogenerates 2.94
17:34:53 bauzas to quickly look*
17:35:11 bauzas but I haven't found a lot, if you still have the problem, you could try to pdb it
17:35:28 bauzas to find how it generates this template
17:35:50 bauzas if you can't, I can offer my help tomorrow
17:37:36 sahid no worries thanks to have looked at it. I will double check that tomorrow as-well, don't spend time on it I will ping you when it's ready :-)
18:28:21 opendevreview Sofia Enriquez proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Implement encryption on backingStore https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870012
18:53:25 opendevreview Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384
#openstack-nova - 2023-01-24
08:50:59 opendevreview Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384
10:28:53 opendevreview Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: At start-up rework compareCPU() usage with a workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870794
10:28:54 opendevreview Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Replace usage of compareCPU() with compareHypervisorCPU() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/869950
10:29:24 kashyap sean-k-mooney: --^ Good catch in the workaround patch; addressed your remarks. When you can, lemme know if that looks fine :)
10:31:04 sean-k-mooney[m] sure ill review it now
10:31:45 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Also: the bug reporter from the downstream also tested it on a real machine and it works
10:33:21 sean-k-mooney[m] nice am if you respin add a release note but im +2 on it
10:43:00 kashyap sean-k-mooney: I'm not sure if this warrants a release note? I don't mind adding, though. Thank you!
10:43:47 kashyap gibi: --^ Please have a gander when you can (the WA patch)
10:44:04 sean-k-mooney[m] i like to have release notes for most of the changes we make that might be of interest to operators
10:44:08 kashyap sean-k-mooney: The API replacement patch lost your +2, can you also re-look at it when you can? - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/869950/9
10:44:19 kashyap (And also it lost +W due to rebase)
10:44:32 sean-k-mooney[m] sure i tought it still had it when i looked but ill look again
10:44:52 kashyap Thx!
10:45:34 sean-k-mooney[m] +2 was still there it lost +w
10:45:52 sean-k-mooney[m] i have added that but its obviously pendeing the first change having both
10:50:09 sean-k-mooney[m] ok i think its time for coffee brb
10:55:55 kashyap Yeah, it won't merge anyway until the predicated patch is merged
11:00:33 ratailor sean-k-mooney[m], gibi Could you please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852737 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861738
11:09:55 sean-k-mooney ratailor: i started looking at that yesterday actully i just got pulled into other discussions
11:10:28 ratailor sean-k-mooney, ack. np. Thanks!
11:18:58 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/zed: Correct config help message related options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871247
11:45:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/train: func: Introduce a server_expected_state kwarg to InstanceHelperMixin._live_migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865382
12:14:24 opendevreview Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384
13:04:44 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ^ can you look at shaid's seriese i think its ready to go
13:05:05 sean-k-mooney zuul is still running on the last revision but the func test fix was trivial so i expect it to pass
13:08:38 sean-k-mooney dansmith: can you send this on its way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865071 that the last patch for the new defaults
13:29:24 bauzas sean-k-mooney: was on my todolist
13:30:08 bauzas btw. thanks for the first thoughts on my series
13:30:51 sean-k-mooney more or less it made sense to me
13:31:03 sean-k-mooney i just needed to figure out how you had it split up
13:32:24 bauzas sean-k-mooney : the 3rd patch was too large for the CI
13:32:31 bauzas hence the split
13:33:12 sean-k-mooney so i can generate a smaller set of files for you if you like
13:33:16 sean-k-mooney many of the files in that are not used
13:33:47 sean-k-mooney if you look you are only using a small subset of sysfs currenly
13:34:02 sean-k-mooney and most of the fiels are symlinks
13:35:48 bauzas yep I know
13:36:15 bauzas like in general sysfs btw ;-)
13:36:47 sean-k-mooney yep
13:37:00 sean-k-mooney it took a while to figureout how to make a copy that worked the same
13:37:41 sean-k-mooney if i rememebr correctly my first attempt flatened the symlinks and resulted in things getting out of sync
14:04:41 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] Testing effects on privsep on a build. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871607
14:05:01 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] Testing effects on privsep on a build. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871607
14:56:18 dansmith sean-k-mooney: yep
15:01:10 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Check VMDK create-type against an allowed list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871612
15:01:45 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Check VMDK create-type against an allowed list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871612
15:02:19 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Check VMDK create-type against an allowed list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871616
15:03:09 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Check VMDK create-type against an allowed list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871622
15:03:39 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Check VMDK create-type against an allowed list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871624
15:03:43 dansmith bauzas: your help on these quickly is appreciated ^
15:05:16 bauzas dansmith: kk, I've seen it before
15:06:08 bauzas sean-k-mooney: dansmith: I have a bit thoughts on upgrades for sahid's new API microversion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384
15:06:26 bauzas dansmith: +2d the master one
15:12:33 sean-k-mooney evacuate will work but not with the latest microverion until you are fully upgraded
15:13:05 sean-k-mooney so the only way around that is a new paramater in the api
15:13:18 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I know, see my comments
15:13:34 dansmith wow, that patch
15:13:35 bauzas sean-k-mooney: my only comment is to say we should at least explain it more
15:13:39 sean-k-mooney but that kind of defeats the idea of always pwowering off unless the new parmater default to powering off if not set
15:14:49 sean-k-mooney bauzas: is the concern mainly for nova-client
15:14:52 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sure, and again, I'm not *against* the new behaviour
15:15:16 sean-k-mooney openstack client need explcit opt in
15:15:24 sean-k-mooney baiscally im wondiering are you ok with just docs
15:15:26 bauzas sean-k-mooney: my only concern is that IMHO we don't really explain it correctly, at least we need an upgrade section
15:15:28 sean-k-mooney or do you want a design change
15:15:51 sean-k-mooney ok so you would like better docs and beeter release note to call that out
15:16:04 bauzas sean-k-mooney: at least I can accept the new behaviour, but I want to make sure that people know it
15:16:37 bauzas as you said, by default OSC will return an exception if you evacuate an instance on Antelope without upgrading all computes
15:16:46 sean-k-mooney no
15:16:50 sean-k-mooney by default it will evacuate
15:16:57 sean-k-mooney because it does not use the latest microverions
15:17:12 sean-k-mooney its only an issue for nova client which woudl use the latest microversion automatically
15:17:15 bauzas I thought that now OSC defaults to the latest
15:17:18 sean-k-mooney nope
15:17:20 sean-k-mooney 2.1
15:17:50 bauzas sean-k-mooney: this is an issue for any client asking the latest

Earlier   Later