Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-21
18:16:31 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 1995153 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862967
18:16:32 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Save cell socket correctly when updating host NUMA topology https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862964
19:20:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Store allocated RP in InstancePCIRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854121
19:20:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Func test for PCI in placement scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854122
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-22
07:57:32 opendevreview Justas Poderys proposed openstack/nova-specs master: VirtIO PackedRing Configuration support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/868377
08:29:46 pslestang Hello!
08:30:09 pslestang Would you have some times to review this patchset? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867832
08:30:43 pslestang I already have one from sean-k-mooney[m] but I need some more opinion
12:08:48 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
14:51:09 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868418
14:59:14 opendevreview yatin proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] Test lower tb cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868419
15:00:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868418
15:09:15 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/os-vif master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/868420
15:12:00 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868421
15:15:36 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/868422
15:20:46 gibi bauzas, stephenfin, sean-k-mooney[m]: here is fixes for the tox4 switch for compute related projects: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:tox4 nova will be green once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/867827 lands
15:22:55 sean-k-mooney[m] thanks im expicting that to be relitivly minor for nova et al
15:27:00 sean-k-mooney[m] gibi the main thing im not sure about is why skipdist=true is being moved out of the default section and only added in bindep
15:27:22 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: skipdist and usedevelop does not work together any more afaik
15:27:45 gibi https://github.com/tox-dev/tox/issues/2730
15:28:43 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: btw if you are around then the os-vif patch still failing in the functional target but I'm not sure why
15:29:45 sean-k-mooney[m] there is a patch from gman that i commeted on
15:29:48 sean-k-mooney[m] i have not had a chance to look into it fully but its on my todo list for my first week back
15:30:09 sean-k-mooney[m] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/861468/4#message-68b5695d34afe144c7789f48fc9271fd8c19e303
15:30:51 sean-k-mooney[m] gibi its unrelated to your change
15:31:00 gibi OK, thanks
15:31:12 sean-k-mooney[m] also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868419 is interesting
15:31:33 gibi sean-k-mooney[m]: also good news, stephenfin reviewed the PCI series all the way up. We landed couple of patches from the bottom where you had +2 too
15:32:01 sean-k-mooney[m] excelent that is also on my todo list for when i get back
15:43:28 sean-k-mooney[m] anyway i skimmed over the seriese and it looks like stephen is happy with most of the rest of the series.
15:44:32 sean-k-mooney[m] so hopefully we can get this merged early next year thanks for prepareing the series the way you did it helps
15:45:44 sean-k-mooney[m] im going to go back to my audio book but you can ping me via this matrix account if anything comes up that needs my attention. o/
15:47:14 gibi enjoy o/
15:49:46 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868418
15:51:03 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/os-vif master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/868420
15:51:47 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868421
15:53:04 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868421
16:13:45 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
16:19:17 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
18:02:02 gmann gibi: pinged sdks core in channel to merge that patch but if that does not happen before ensure-tox unpin tox then we can make sdk job as n-v for now and proceed
18:02:11 gmann let's see
18:02:33 gmann sdks fix needed for many other projects also as they run sdk job including devstack
18:30:13 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
18:31:18 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
18:36:17 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-23
08:36:34 Etua Hello, I'd like to create and test some new filters and weights for the scheduler. Ideally, I would mimic an existing OpenStack deployment I have access to. I already installed placement component, to which the scheduler would connect and now I'd like to isolate it. I'm not sure how to approach it, as scheduler is part of Nova and not a stand-alone component as placement.
08:36:39 Etua My intention is to initially fill placement's database with information about the infrastructure, set up the scheduler and then query it for consecutive requests (linear, no need for locks if that changes anything) to log the decisions it would make with modified weights/filters and the state of the system in-between requests.
08:36:49 Etua What is in your opinion the best way to detach the scheduler as much as possible from the rest of Nova, in order to test it under configuration most resembling the real-world setup? Should I use the test framework and mimic how it is set up for the unit tests or is there a better way to go?
09:00:37 opendevreview Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324
13:53:38 ierdem__ Hi everyone, I am doing some researches about signing images on OpenStack for a while. I have deployed a test environment (OS Victoria) and successfully signed an image. Thus, I know that image is trusted and I can use it and its derivatives on my OpenStack.
13:53:49 ierdem__ I have a question at this point; when I take snapshot of a VM which is created from signed image, that snapshot is created without sign metadata and that confused me. If an image is trusted, VM will be trusted if created from it. According to this logic, snapshot of that VM also should be signed/trusted. What is the purpose of this flow? Can someone explain this? Thanks a lot.
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-25
08:34:54 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868421
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-26
09:42:40 sahid o/
10:36:01 sahid \\
12:16:22 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: nova manage: Add handling for deleted attachment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868597
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-27
03:45:41 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Enable new defaults and scope checks by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866218
03:48:56 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Enable new defaults and scope checks by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866218
19:58:01 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/zed: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868559
20:00:06 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/yoga: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868719
20:00:44 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/xena: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868720
20:01:49 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/wallaby: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868721
20:04:23 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/zed: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/868722
20:05:03 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/yoga: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/868723
20:06:04 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/xena: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/868724
20:06:51 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/wallaby: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/868725
20:14:08 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/zed: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868727
20:25:22 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/zed: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868727
20:28:59 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: DNM: testing tox4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868728
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-28
05:22:50 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/yoga: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868735
05:24:18 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/yoga: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868735
05:26:29 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/xena: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868736
05:27:46 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/wallaby: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868737
05:31:34 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Fix tox4 error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868728
14:02:38 admin1 hi all .. nova.instances table . does host and node hold redundant information ?
14:02:42 admin1 or in which case would they differ ?
19:04:22 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: [stable-only] Fix tox4 error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868790
19:06:01 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: [stable-only] Fix tox4 error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868728
19:06:42 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: [stable-only] Fix tox4 error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868790
19:08:39 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Fix tox4 error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868791
19:36:21 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/yoga: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868735
20:14:21 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Fix tox4 error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868791
20:41:42 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/placement stable/xena: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/868736
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-29
01:28:43 sean-k-mooney[m] admin1: no the host value is the rpc endpoint name and maps to the name of the compute service that manages the host the instance is associated with. the node value is the name of the compute node, for ironic the node value is the uuid of the corresponding ironic baremetal node, for all other virt drivers the node value is the same as the host value which is set by the host config option which defaults to socket.gethostname().
01:28:43 sean-k-mooney[m] so while the value of host and node is often the same they are conceptualy not the same.
01:37:02 sean-k-mooney[m] ierdem__: once you create a vm form an image you could modify the content of the instance root disk via first boot scripts or logging in so the signigure of instance snapshot would not have any releation to the orginal image. it does not hold true that if an image is trusted the vm is trusted because the instance can be modifed and there for any trust fo the orginal image cannot be assumed to tansfer to any snapshot of the
01:37:02 sean-k-mooney[m] image. first-boot script i.e. via user-data and cloud-init, ssh key injections, modifcation via login and other operatiosn such as boot from rescue disk mean that there is a treat vector and any kind of trust that existed for the orginal image need to be reverifed from scratch for any snapshots
01:40:39 sean-k-mooney[m] Etua: you have two options. either extend the functional test suite to mimic the senarios you want to test or take a more real world approch and deploy a large number of compute services using the fake driver. if you can deploy the fake driver in a container that make it much simpler to run many of the on a limited number of hosts.
01:41:15 sean-k-mooney[m] in either case you will need to write code to build the senairios and execute your tests.
01:46:35 sean-k-mooney[m] the schduler is more or less independent form the rest of nova and can be deployed on its own. its only api is the internal rpc api which is normally invoked by the nova conductor. if you create the api and cell dbs and a rabbitmq broker then populate the cell db with fake compute nodes and set up the cell->host mappings you could fake the compute nodes that way and then do your testing by creating flavors and invoking the rpc
01:46:35 sean-k-mooney[m] api.
01:46:58 sean-k-mooney[m] it is not a trivial thing to do however.
01:47:58 sean-k-mooney[m] its not hard just invovled/tedious to do that
01:49:25 sean-k-mooney[m] the functional tests have fixtures that automate much of this but its not reusable independetly.
03:12:00 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/xena: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868720
03:17:55 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/wallaby: Make tox.ini tox 4.0.0 compatible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/868721
04:08:15 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: DNM: testing requirement-checks job on stable branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868852
04:21:30 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: DNM: testing requirement-checks job on stable branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868853
05:05:18 opendevreview Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: DNM: testing requirement-checks job on stable branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868853
15:34:18 opendevreview Jean-Sébastien Bevilacqua proposed openstack/nova master: Add Lustre support to nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853786
17:12:44 opendevreview Jean-Sébastien Bevilacqua proposed openstack/nova master: Add Lustre support to nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853786

Earlier   Later