Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-13
16:47:14 elodilles thanks bauzas o/
16:48:13 clarkb bauzas: to clarify a bit more on the tox stuff I'm trying to keep on top of it from a high level and in shared library tooling like the ensure-tox role. But I'm not planning to edit all the various tox.ini files to make them work :)
16:48:25 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Retry attachment delete API call for 504 Gateway Timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866083
16:48:26 bauzas ok
16:48:27 clarkb but nova's actually looks really clean and if that test change passes then you are probably fine
17:04:14 gmann elodilles: gibi: clarkb: bauzas: on tox. we have pinned it in devstack side for tox based job also https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/master/playbooks/tox/pre.yaml#L14
17:04:56 gmann so ensure-tox role unpinning on dev 21 should not impact devstack based tox job. but yes we need to move master to tox 4.0.0 soon
17:05:48 clarkb right I think the main concern at this point is developers aren't going to want to maintain different versions of tox for different projects. Generally keeping up with latest avoids this problem. We pinned to stop the bleeding and now we can take a controlled approach to adding compatibility
17:06:28 gmann yeah
17:33:36 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Create RequestGroups from InstancePCIRequests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852771
17:33:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Support resource_class and traits in PCI alias https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853316
17:33:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Split PCI pools per PF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854440
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-14
08:35:44 opendevreview Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: compute: enhance compute evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858383
08:35:44 opendevreview Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384
08:36:16 bauzas happy spec review day everyone
08:50:18 sahid o/ I will be around if needed
13:23:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Fix the wrong exception used to retry detach API calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866084
13:23:35 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Retry attachment delete API call for 504 Gateway Timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866085
14:11:41 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864773
14:33:10 andry Hi to all, on my openstack installation I have one kvm that has been emptied and rebooted, but when i launch openstack hypervisor show podto2-kvm06 I see running_vms 7 but if I see on kvm I don't see vm and if I list openstack server list --all --host kvm, nothing appear. How is it possible?Thank you.
14:39:02 andry now i'm seeing on nova of kvm Error updating resources for node podto2-kvm06.: ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
14:41:18 amorin hey sean-k-mooney and other, I'd love having a review on this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853682
14:44:07 amorin and also: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863891
14:46:03 opendevreview Manuel Bentele proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add configuration options to set SPICE compression settings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/849488
15:23:37 sean-k-mooney amorin:perhaps tomorrow. today is intented to be a spec review day
15:24:04 sean-k-mooney for reasons i have not been able to spend much time on reviews today but tomrrow is ment to be an unoffical implemantion reveiw day
15:24:15 sean-k-mooney ill see if i can take a look at it then
16:11:02 amorin ack, thanks
17:44:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: add spec for fqdn in hostname https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/862626
17:57:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Add configuration options to set SPICE compression settings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/849488
21:05:40 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: trivial: Remove use of kwargs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/806918
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-15
05:26:10 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Enable new defaults and scope checks by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866218
07:56:15 opendevreview Nobuhiro MIKI proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add maxphysaddr support for Libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/861033
08:00:21 opendevreview Hiroki Narukawa proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: retry libvirt connection on live_migration_monitor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867077
10:54:11 sean-k-mooney bauzas: hi i was wrogn yestereday johns ironic spec is not merged yet but im more or less happy with it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/862833 do you want to review or will i add +w
10:54:40 sean-k-mooney there are a few nits that i think can be adressed in a followup but i dont see anything that would prevent us merging it as is
11:31:01 sean-k-mooney gibi: i need to do one thing then grab coffee after that i will be staring to review the pci series
11:31:25 gibi sean-k-mooney: OK. I replied to your comments about the rp_uuid vs rp_uuids
11:32:31 sean-k-mooney ya i was just checkign that and going to ping you
11:32:38 sean-k-mooney so based on your answer
11:33:15 sean-k-mooney we are using that array for two different types
11:33:30 gibi nope
11:33:41 sean-k-mooney pool vs spec
11:34:06 gibi pool has a single rp uuid, spec has a list of rp uuids serialized as comma separates string
11:34:27 sean-k-mooney yes but ignored_tags is beign applied to both
11:35:14 gibi ahh, yes that is applied to both yes
11:35:26 sean-k-mooney ya so that is what was confusitng me
11:35:48 sean-k-mooney since each type only have one fo the two field but we have on array of ignored tags
11:36:12 sean-k-mooney anyway based on your comments and this converstaion i now understand the intent
11:36:53 sean-k-mooney we might want to consider doing this diffently but i think im ok with this for now. but we my want to split this in a followup
11:37:31 gibi I made a note and I will look into this
11:37:32 sean-k-mooney ill leave a comment to that effect and see what stephen thinks when he gets to it and upgrade to +2
12:51:08 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for add/remove instance info from node https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/659691
12:51:09 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for getting network metadata from node https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/670213
12:51:09 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove use of removeprefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867788
12:51:10 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unused mocks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867789
12:51:10 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for volume_target.* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867790
12:51:11 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for node.set_provision_state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867791
12:51:11 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for node.set_power_state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867792
12:51:12 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for node.vif* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867793
12:51:12 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for remaining network operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867794
12:51:14 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for remaining ironic driver calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867795
12:51:14 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for deprecated baremetal proxy API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867796
12:51:16 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove Ironic client wrapper https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867797
12:51:16 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unnecessary aliasing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867798
12:51:18 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use real SDK objects in tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867799
12:52:08 stephenfin now back to reviews
13:10:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Map PCI pools to RP UUIDs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854118
13:13:23 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: is that replaceing the ironic client usage with sdk
13:13:48 sean-k-mooney we have a RFE bug for that if you were not aware can you link to that in the toic/commtis
13:21:33 sean-k-mooney gibi: bauzas this is the glace spec by the way that i mentioned yesterday https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/863209
13:21:55 bauzas ok
13:22:38 sean-k-mooney bauzas: did you see my ping for the ironic spec
13:23:21 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/862833
13:23:37 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup, I'll review about it
14:06:25 gibi sean-k-mooney: I read through the glance spec above but I cannot really add much to it top of your and dansmith_s comments
14:11:34 sean-k-mooney ack do you have any idea how backup works today?
14:11:48 sean-k-mooney i always assumed we had glance details in our config
14:12:25 sean-k-mooney backup predates microversion so i never really looked at the details sicne it also predates specs in nova
14:12:49 johnthetubaguy bauzas: I am sort of around today if there are questions on the spec, in case that helps.
14:15:58 gibi sean-k-mooney: never tried backup
14:16:35 johnthetubaguy sean-k-mooney: I thought it was just a regular snapshot using the users token? Its not on a schedule, we just delete old ones after creating a new one... I thought. Been about 5 years since I tried it mind. Although those glance calls can also get a service token attached, to stop the user token expiry issues.
14:17:35 johnthetubaguy you could require a service token, a bit like how we discussed for using user tokens for port binding in neutron
14:42:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: tests: Fix Python 3.11 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/867270
14:43:28 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: yeah, exactly. What's the RFE/bug?
15:00:18 opendevreview Pierre-Samuel Le Stang proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer test of bug #1999674 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867807
15:11:44 bauzas johnthetubaguy: sean-k-mooney: fwiw, I'm on the spec since 30 mins
15:11:51 bauzas should be done in 10 mins
15:12:41 sean-k-mooney ack
15:23:12 bauzas johnthetubaguy: sean-k-mooney send to the gate with comments
15:23:16 bauzas nothing important
15:23:29 bauzas and as said, we can continue discussing about those during the implementation
15:23:36 bauzas but I don't wanna hold this spec for this cycle
15:35:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Ironic shard_key to replace peer_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/862833
16:02:28 rloo hi nova-folks. thanks johnthetubaguy for fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1974070 because I need that fix in wallaby! Is this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864773 backportable, it added a new config option?
16:05:06 johnthetubaguy rloo: your very welcome! I think it is backportable, because its a workaround config option, at least I think that is what we agreed. I haven't had chance to propose it myself though.
16:06:22 rloo thx johnthetubaguy ! if i can recall how to, i'll try to propose them and see how that goes :)
16:07:28 rloo btw johnthetubaguy, this didn't get merged, is it still desired? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/842478
16:09:06 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867642
16:17:46 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Use extend volume completion action https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490

Earlier   Later