| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-12-12 | |||
| 17:34:02 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: testS: Fix Python 3.11 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/867270 | |
| 17:48:50 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: trivial: Remove use of kwargs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/806918 | |
| 17:49:27 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: tests: Fix Python 3.11 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/867270 | |
| 19:53:39 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Update python classifier for python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/861469 | |
| 21:51:47 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/zed: Support multiple config file with mod_wsgi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867162 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-12-13 | |||
| 05:37:33 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Enable new defaults and scope checks by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866218 | |
| 08:42:42 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce asym NUMA mixed CPU policy bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862686 | |
| 08:42:43 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Handle zero pinned CPU in a cell with mixed policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862687 | |
| 08:43:26 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce asym NUMA mixed CPU policy bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862686 | |
| 08:43:27 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Handle zero pinned CPU in a cell with mixed policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862687 | |
| 09:58:31 | opendevreview | Aaron S proposed openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324 | |
| 13:49:16 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: FUP for the scheduler part of PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862876 | |
| 14:56:06 | opendevreview | Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Use extend volume completion action https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490 | |
| 15:55:47 | bauzas | reminder : nova meeting in 5 mins | |
| 16:00:34 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:34 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Dec 13 16:00:34 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:34 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:34 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:40 | bauzas | hey folks | |
| 16:00:47 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:18 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:01:25 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:31 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:46 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:02:03 | bauzas | okidoki let's start | |
| 16:02:09 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:14 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:19 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 19 new untriaged bugs (+1 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:46 | bauzas | sorry I was planning to do the triage yesterday with amit but given he wasn't here, I forgot | |
| 16:03:01 | bauzas | so, I'll take the baton again | |
| 16:03:46 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:04:06 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to bauzas | |
| 16:04:16 | bauzas | any bug you want to discuss ? | |
| 16:04:39 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:04:52 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:04:57 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:01 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:05 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:05:11 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 proposal to add more delay for centos9s-fips job | |
| 16:05:21 | bauzas | as you can see, ^ was +Wd | |
| 16:05:43 | bauzas | so, hopefully, it could be merged in a few days | |
| 16:05:50 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:05:54 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:05:59 | bauzas | voila for gate bugs | |
| 16:06:39 | bauzas | gibi: you told me some change was fixing the issue for nova-ceph-multistore and nova-grenade-multinode | |
| 16:06:50 | gibi | yes | |
| 16:06:56 | gibi | it was pinning tox to < 4.0 | |
| 16:07:07 | gibi | it is merged last week | |
| 16:07:20 | gibi | since then we merged things to master so I think master gate is OK | |
| 16:07:33 | elodilles | note that that workaround will be removed @ Dec 21 | |
| 16:07:49 | gibi | elodilles: then we have a broken gate @ Dec 21 :) | |
| 16:07:51 | clarkb | in the ensure-tox role which won't affect devstack but will affect unittests and other things | |
| 16:07:52 | bauzas | gibi: cool thanks | |
| 16:08:02 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1999183 | |
| 16:08:06 | gibi | clarkb: ahh that sounds better | |
| 16:08:26 | clarkb | you can either pin ensure-tox to <4 in your .zuul.yaml by setting ensure_tox_version or whatever I called the variable or fix your tox.ini to work under tox v4 | |
| 16:09:09 | elodilles | clarkb: thanks for the clarification | |
| 16:09:09 | gibi | clarkb: ack, based on the timing I guess we will fix this next year :) | |
| 16:09:24 | clarkb | there are two main issues that we've found with tox v4 you need to convert whitelist_externals to allowlist_externals and that list must be complee as it doesn't just warn now but creates an error. And #'s in commands entries are interpreted as ini comments and you may need to escape them with \# if you intend for them to make it into the command | |
| 16:10:45 | bauzas | so, we don't need to modify our .zuul.yaml file ? | |
| 16:11:21 | clarkb | you either fix your tox.ini so that it is compatibile with tox v4 (and v3) or you update your .zuul.yaml to pin tox <4 | |
| 16:11:29 | gibi | bauzas: probably we are better of fixing our tox.ini instead | |
| 16:11:36 | clarkb | the ideal is the first option as that way developers don't get confused when tox doesn't work for them locally | |
| 16:12:00 | clarkb | I think if that wasn't a concern then we wouldn't be in a hurry to unpin and half force projects to address this, but it does actually represent a real world concern that we should be addressing | |
| 16:12:38 | bauzas | gibi: do we have the same issue than devtack by our own tox.ini file ? | |
| 16:12:53 | bauzas | about usage of allowlist_externals | |
| 16:13:12 | gibi | clarkb: said about that the Dec 21 change will not effect devstack jobs | |
| 16:13:53 | clarkb | devstack installs and manages tox itself so it controls when tox gets unpinned if ever | |
| 16:14:09 | gibi | clarkb thanks | |
| 16:14:28 | clarkb | skimming the nova tox.ini it actually looks like it might be ok. I'll push a change in a second that forces nova to use tox 4 in unittests to try and confirm | |
| 16:15:04 | bauzas | clarkb: okay, let ping us if you want after this | |
| 16:15:16 | bauzas | clarkb: and thanks for working on it | |
| 16:16:10 | bauzas | shall we move on ? | |
| 16:16:12 | opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/nova master: DNM force latest tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867533 | |
| 16:16:59 | bauzas | ack ^ | |
| 16:17:05 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:17:13 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:17:19 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | |
| 16:17:23 | bauzas | #info Antelope-2 is in 3 weeks | |
| 16:17:31 | bauzas | as a reminder, we will have a Spec review day tomorrow | |
| 16:17:34 | bauzas | mark your calendars | |
| 16:17:56 | bauzas | #info Spec review day planned for Dec 14th | |
| 16:18:13 | bauzas | that's all I have here | |
| 16:18:22 | bauzas | any release question ? | |
| 16:19:06 | gibi | I will be a bit busy tomorrow witha in internal demo | |
| 16:19:17 | gibi | but I will try to get some time on specs too | |
| 16:19:20 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 16:19:24 | bauzas | gibi: no worries | |
| 16:19:38 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:19:49 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:20:28 | bauzas | btw. for tomorrow's spec review day, it would be nice if cores could +2 the r-p label for each of the specs they want to look at during the day | |
| 16:20:52 | bauzas | so, when another core looks at a spec, he will know whether some other cores want to do this as well | |
| 16:20:58 | bauzas | just sayin' | |
| 16:22:58 | bauzas | movin' on | |
| 16:23:05 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:23:10 | bauzas | elodilles: your time | |
| 16:23:18 | elodilles | in short: nothing to report :) | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:23:23 | elodilles | in more length: | |