Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-11-22
16:14:59 bauzas and then we run all the other tempest jobs with the latest ubuntu version
16:15:37 bauzas yeah so
16:15:38 sean-k-mooney this cycle the grenade jobs shoudl be on focal which shoudl provide enough test coverage
16:15:45 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/861116 Base jobs are migrated to Jammy
16:16:04 sean-k-mooney ill comment on the review
16:16:09 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111 Nova specific jobs migration to Jammy need to be reviewed
16:16:27 bauzas sean-k-mooney: me too
16:16:35 bauzas ok, anything else ?
16:16:53 sean-k-mooney nope
16:16:57 sean-k-mooney not from me
16:17:05 bauzas moving on
16:18:23 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:18:29 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html
16:18:34 bauzas #info Antelope-1 was last week
16:18:39 bauzas #info Spec review day had 6 specs merged and more than 10 others being discussed.
16:18:48 bauzas kudos to the reviewers who worked on it
16:19:21 bauzas as a reminder, we will get another spec review day in a couple of weeks before milestone-2
16:19:45 bauzas we should also plan some implementation review day around between a-1 and a-2
16:20:30 bauzas voilà, anything to discuss about either the spec review day or antelope-1 ?
16:21:32 bauzas fwiw, we merged a release for novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/861360
16:21:52 bauzas and ditto for os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864527
16:22:29 bauzas if no questions, let's move on
16:26:47 bauzas sorry, I'm being dragged in a meeting, can someone continue ?
16:26:49 bauzas gibi: ?
16:27:03 gibi sure I will try
16:27:29 gibi #topic Review priorities
16:27:35 gibi #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:27:40 gibi #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:27:54 gibi is there anything we need to discuss on these priorities?
16:28:43 gibi #topic Stable Branches
16:28:52 gibi elodilles: your turn :)
16:29:04 gibi I have a quetion on stable/train
16:29:26 elodilles #info wallaby is blocked due to failing nova-ceph-multistore, workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865134
16:29:45 elodilles this is an interesting one, stable cores, please review if possible ^^^
16:29:55 elodilles #info ussuri and train is blocked due to nova-multi-cell job, possible fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/865300
16:30:15 elodilles ^^^ thanks sean-k-mooney for calling my attention to the issue :)
16:30:26 elodilles #info rest of the stable branches should be OK
16:30:33 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:30:43 sean-k-mooney i appoved the first one addign os-brick to requried project will also make depends on work
16:30:43 elodilles and that's it from my side
16:31:14 gibi elodilles: do you know about any issues on stable/train
16:31:29 bauzas ok, I'm back
16:31:30 gibi I see multiple job failing with
16:31:30 elodilles sean-k-mooney: thanks. i think that is the most straightforward workaround for the situation
16:31:30 gibi rsync: [sender] link_stat "/var/lib/zuul/builds/eacfbbe59b6a4297a4aebb16cc7d2140/work/ca-bundle.pem" failed: No such file or directory (2)
16:31:33 gibi rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=3.2.3]
16:31:55 gibi ie https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841444/4
16:32:06 gibi s/ie/eg/
16:32:34 elodilles gibi: rsync problem usually happened due to infra issues, but those usually temporary / intermittent issues
16:33:02 elodilles gibi: train is blocked, see above :)
16:33:05 gibi I got it mutliple times. I did a rebase at the start of the meeting if that hits the same I will ping the team again as that will mean it is blocked
16:33:08 bauzas #chair gibi
16:33:08 opendevmeet Current chairs: bauzas gibi
16:33:26 bauzas (just added gibi for chair, not sure the bot will correctly set the topics)
16:33:35 gibi elodilles: aaah,
16:33:45 gibi sorry it is a bit hard to be on two meetings in parallel
16:33:51 gibi so we know that train is broken
16:33:53 elodilles :S
16:33:57 gibi then I have no other question :)
16:34:04 elodilles gibi: yepp, but not with the rsync error
16:34:25 elodilles so that's a new thing if it is a permanent problem :(
16:34:26 gibi interesting
16:34:28 bauzas we should name the train bug "sncf" as train is always broken :)
16:34:42 gibi anyhow I will report back if the same failure happens in the recent rebase too
16:34:58 elodilles gibi: ack, thx
16:35:07 gibi I thank you :)
16:35:17 gibi any other topics on stable?
16:35:23 bauzas looks not
16:35:57 bauzas moving on ?
16:36:01 bauzas I'll need to speak in a little
16:36:26 gibi #topic Open discussion
16:36:30 gibi (jsanemet) Improve usage of privsep on Nova:
16:36:31 gibi Bug ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1996213 Proposal: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review Does the change deserve a spec?
16:36:48 bauzas yeah so
16:37:22 gibi jsanemet: on the spec question. Do you feel you have open question that would need upfront decision from the core team?
16:37:25 bauzas I discussed with jsanemet about his efforts and I proposed him to present himself and discuss about how we could paper the privsep effort during the meeting
16:37:40 bauzas the spec thing was more a wonder we had
16:37:52 bauzas I don't honestly feel it requires one spec
16:38:06 bauzas but we tho need to consider documenting the new context usages
16:38:12 bauzas hence the etherpad
16:38:52 jsanemet hello
16:38:53 bauzas I don't see any upgrade impact, or any other impact which would require us to accept a spedc
16:39:38 bauzas anyone disagree with that plan ?
16:40:21 dansmith what is the effort? just finishing some things?
16:40:28 dansmith or something more complex?
16:40:29 bauzas dansmith: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review
16:40:42 bauzas dansmith: this is about fine-graining the privsep context to the right callers
16:40:43 sean-k-mooney there are several
16:40:58 sean-k-mooney this looks like the first low haning fruit
16:40:59 dansmith yeah so splitting into different contexts?
16:41:06 sean-k-mooney yep
16:41:08 bauzas as a first step yes
16:41:21 dansmith I dunno, I think that's going to be a bunch of review of which calls need which contexts right?
16:41:31 bauzas that's my concern
16:41:35 dansmith some things might seem simple but require both net and sys, etc
16:41:35 bauzas I don't think we need a spec
16:41:38 bauzas but,
16:42:01 dansmith I guess I'm not sure why no spec
16:42:03 bauzas I'd appreciate if we would agree on the contexts and the callers not exacly by reviewing the patches
16:42:07 dansmith this etherpad is half a spec already

Earlier   Later