| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-11-15 | |||
| 16:15:26 | bauzas | said +1d | |
| 16:15:35 | bauzas | should get the PTL-vote then | |
| 16:15:49 | bauzas | thanks takashi for your efforts, btw. | |
| 16:15:56 | bauzas | greatly appreciated | |
| 16:16:16 | gibi | ^^ +1 | |
| 16:16:32 | bauzas | I haven't looked at our libs recently | |
| 16:16:57 | bauzas | milestone-1 is maybe premature but we could release some libs updates like os-vif if that helps | |
| 16:16:59 | dvo-plv | Hello, All could you please review our blueprint: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/859290 | |
| 16:17:04 | sean-k-mooney | milestone 1 already... this will be a very short cycle | |
| 16:17:29 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yup, I said it loudly in the antelope release schedule patch | |
| 16:17:50 | elodilles | yepp, this is a 24 weeks long cycle | |
| 16:18:15 | bauzas | dvo-plv: we're on meeting now, but be sure we'll look at all specs today as this is a day prioritized for it | |
| 16:18:27 | bauzas | anyway, I guess we're done | |
| 16:18:35 | bauzas | like I said, no libraries need for release ? | |
| 16:18:53 | bauzas | disclaimer, I can check the git repos, I'm just lazy to do so | |
| 16:19:05 | elodilles | i haven't checked, but were there merged patches there? | |
| 16:19:13 | bauzas | that's my question :) | |
| 16:19:37 | bauzas | anyway, we're not constrained by the milestone, we can release whenever we want | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | that's it then for me today | |
| 16:19:56 | bauzas | any other topic to address before we end the meeting ? | |
| 16:20:34 | bauzas | thanks all, appreciated your presence while you all are quite busy this day | |
| 16:20:46 | bauzas | have a good day and let's continue our effort | |
| 16:20:49 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:20:50 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Nov 15 16:20:49 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:20:50 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-15-16.00.html | |
| 16:20:50 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-15-16.00.txt | |
| 16:20:50 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-15-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:20:58 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:21:26 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:21:50 | elodilles | bauzas: the release patches were generated for Antelope-1, but I see only python-novaclient, so I guess no other lib release is needed: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:antelope-milestone-1 | |
| 16:22:28 | elodilles | bauzas: wrong, there's os-vif: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864527 | |
| 16:22:36 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ^^^ | |
| 16:23:26 | bauzas | I don't think we need to tag it 3.1.0 | |
| 16:23:33 | bauzas | per the commit msg | |
| 16:24:02 | elodilles | we need to bump at least MINOR versions between series | |
| 16:24:04 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: before we proceed with that i just want to make sure we have landed the tox/gitreview patches | |
| 16:24:32 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ++, thanks in advance for taking care of that! | |
| 16:24:35 | sean-k-mooney | oh never mind we dont need too | |
| 16:24:41 | sean-k-mooney | we only change them on stable to aovid that | |
| 16:24:45 | elodilles | then even better :) | |
| 16:25:13 | sean-k-mooney | i saw the email come in for the release this mornign but didnt open the patch yet | |
| 16:26:06 | elodilles | the generated patches on master branch seem to be merged | |
| 16:26:14 | sean-k-mooney | looking at the oneline summery i think this makes sense and i agree a feature bump is correct | |
| 16:26:29 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:26:51 | sean-k-mooney | so there was os-vif and novaclient if i rememebr correctly | |
| 16:27:06 | bauzas | ok, then I'll +1 it | |
| 16:27:09 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864536 | |
| 16:28:00 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's a duplicate of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/861360 | |
| 16:28:01 | sean-k-mooney | both have the swap to the new testing runtime merged and not much else so i think we can release that too | |
| 16:28:40 | sean-k-mooney | yes and no | |
| 16:28:49 | sean-k-mooney | the release was being doen for different reasons | |
| 16:29:15 | sean-k-mooney | but sure we can go with the takashi's patch | |
| 16:29:16 | bauzas | surely, but the result is the same even if the gerrit topics are different | |
| 16:34:22 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/placement master: Policy defaults improvement spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/864385 | |
| 16:34:56 | gmann | bauzas: sean-k-mooney dansmith ^^ updated placement spec also for RBAC to add admin-or-service default what we discussed on IRC | |
| 16:35:07 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:39:43 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:48:38 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Policy service role spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/864379 | |
| 17:27:47 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: gibi: thanks for having commented out the CPU spec | |
| 17:27:51 | bauzas | will update it tomorrow | |
| 17:28:17 | sean-k-mooney | cool ill take a look then | |
| 17:28:19 | gibi | bauzas: no worries. feel free to ping me later and I cen re-review | |
| 17:51:13 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/placement master: Policy defaults improvement spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/864385 | |
| 17:52:30 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: ^^ updated the upgrade impact and scope_type change. | |
| 18:37:05 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral storage encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/864138 | |
| 18:38:29 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral encryption for libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/864147 | |
| 18:42:40 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add stable-compute-uuid spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863152 | |
| 23:42:24 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in nova policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-11-16 | |||
| 02:34:05 | opendevreview | Nobuhiro MIKI proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: fix typo in test_config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864641 | |
| 03:44:26 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in nova policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594 | |
| 04:49:37 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref update: Move the service APIs in a separate section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864655 | |
| 05:38:39 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref update: Move the service APIs in a separate section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864655 | |
| 05:44:34 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Refactor volume connection cleanup out of _post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864670 | |
| 05:44:35 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Move pre-3.44 Cinder post live migration test to test_compute_mgr https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864671 | |
| 05:44:36 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: functional: Change order of two classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864672 | |
| 05:51:41 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: test new defaults https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864673 | |
| 06:10:48 | opendevreview | Younghwan Yoo proposed openstack/nova master: Update a return value of mdev_name2uuid function to be a valid UUID value https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864674 | |
| 06:13:48 | han-guangyu | Hello, I want to package ovn in openEuler(a OS had been supported by openstack ci)) | |
| 06:14:13 | han-guangyu | Could I can get a recommended version of ovn to Train and Wallaby | |
| 06:14:37 | han-guangyu | I see: | |
| 06:14:49 | han-guangyu | > OpenStack doesn’t set explicit version requirements for OVN installation, but it’s recommended to follow at least the version that is used in upstream CI, in https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/ovn/faq/index.html | |
| 06:16:06 | han-guangyu | But I am not sure, if I use the latest version of ovn, whether the neutron of train and wallaby both can be connected normally | |
| 06:16:22 | han-guangyu | Do they have a capped version that supports | |
| 06:17:27 | opendevreview | Younghwan Yoo proposed openstack/nova master: Update mdev_name2uuid function return value to be a valid UUID https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864674 | |
| 06:21:13 | opendevreview | Younghwan Yoo proposed openstack/nova master: Update return value to be a valid UUID https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864674 | |
| 06:21:22 | han-guangyu | oh | |
| 06:21:34 | han-guangyu | I send to a incorret channel | |
| 06:21:42 | han-guangyu | I want to neutron , sorry | |
| 06:37:31 | opendevreview | Younghwan Yoo proposed openstack/nova master: Update return value to be a valid UUID https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864674 | |
| 06:42:59 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: functional: Change order of two classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864672 | |
| 07:56:32 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Add boot from volume functional test with a huge request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864679 | |
| 09:02:29 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova-specs master: spec: allowing target state for evacuate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/857838 | |
| 09:03:15 | sahid | gibi, sean-k-mooney o/ if you can have a second look at ^ there is one point that I don't get | |
| 09:05:09 | gibi | sahid: looking... | |
| 09:08:47 | sean-k-mooney[m] | sahid gibi is just asking that you bump the compute service version and add a min compute service version check in the api | |
| 09:09:13 | sean-k-mooney[m] | so if you upgrade the api and conductors but not the computes | |
| 09:09:26 | sean-k-mooney[m] | we would still reject the new microversion | |
| 09:09:36 | sean-k-mooney[m] | until you completed updating all the computes | |
| 09:10:48 | gibi | yepp | |
| 09:10:52 | gibi | I left a reply in the review too | |