Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-11-08
16:06:25 bauzas as you can see, no issues for the CI periodic jobs (except for fips)
16:06:43 bauzas I need to modify the job to have more 30 mins
16:06:50 bauzas *deadline
16:07:17 bauzas any concern ?
16:07:44 bauzas looks not
16:07:48 bauzas moving on again
16:07:55 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:08:03 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html
16:08:10 bauzas #info Antelope-1 is planned in 1 week
16:08:13 bauzas sl
16:08:14 bauzas so
16:08:33 bauzas when we should have a specs review day ?
16:08:41 bauzas next tuesday works ?
16:09:06 sean-k-mooney proably yes
16:09:29 sean-k-mooney ill be around and hopefully have more time to review next week
16:10:02 bauzas ok, anyone having an issue ?
16:10:07 bauzas for next tuesday
16:10:49 gibi works for me
16:11:02 bauzas ok
16:12:11 bauzas #agreed We will have have a spec review day on Nov 15th, please prepare your specs before this day and make sure you can be around on this day if you have reviews
16:12:43 bauzas #action bauzas to write an openstack-discuss email for this
16:12:59 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:13:36 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:14:07 bauzas as you can see, now we have more review-prio usage from contributors :)
16:14:09 bauzas <3
16:14:21 bauzas so, please, look at those when you review
16:14:36 bauzas #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:14:49 bauzas any question here ?
16:15:19 sean-k-mooney its not qiute what i was suggestign for the usage but ok
16:15:38 sean-k-mooney +1 was commit to review +2 was asking for other cores to also review
16:15:42 sean-k-mooney but either woks
16:16:35 bauzas k
16:17:08 bauzas at least contributors can +1 if they want core reviews for some change they reviewed (not for their own changes of course)
16:18:22 bauzas moving on ?
16:18:31 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:18:40 bauzas elodilles : your time
16:18:47 elodilles #info wallaby transitioned to Extended Maintenance ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862298 )
16:19:21 elodilles and we have released a final wallaby release
16:19:31 elodilles #info stable branches state should be OK (except stein and older)
16:19:41 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:19:47 elodilles and last but not least:
16:20:02 elodilles as said 2 weeks ago: stein, rocky and queens EOL'ing patch was proposed: https://review.opendev.org/862520 + mail was sent to ML https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/030980.html
16:20:26 elodilles as I see no mail replies arrived on the thread
16:20:39 elodilles so I propose to continue with the EOL'ing
16:20:49 bauzas yup, agreed
16:20:54 bauzas I just +1d the change
16:21:02 elodilles bauzas: thanks!
16:21:02 bauzas we agreed on it during the PTG
16:21:20 bauzas and given none has concerns by the email, that means we can EOL
16:21:43 bauzas elodilles: I guess you can now remove the -W
16:22:29 elodilles removed it now
16:22:53 bauzas thbanks
16:23:19 bauzas anything else to discuss about the stable branches ?
16:23:27 elodilles nothing from me
16:24:53 bauzas ok, last topic then
16:24:59 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:25:05 bauzas we have an item today
16:25:21 bauzas Kirill_ : vnc console for baremetal. new spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863773
16:25:30 bauzas I guess you want reviews ?
16:26:03 Kirill_ hi! yes. also i've emplemented it)
16:27:14 bauzas Kirill_: OK, then no worries, we'll look at your spec at least on next Tuesday
16:27:17 sean-k-mooney so you used to be able to do this in the past
16:27:46 bauzas but if you can discuss about the design, sure, let us knwo
16:27:49 sean-k-mooney with the ipmi driver and vncinabox or something like that
16:27:51 bauzas if you *want
16:28:09 sean-k-mooney shellinabox
16:28:28 sean-k-mooney that was the ironic optional component
16:28:49 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/admin/console.html
16:29:11 sean-k-mooney if you use that you can enabel the console to work in horizong today
16:29:34 Kirill_ i work on idrac servers+adding ilo console
16:29:51 Kirill_ but the main gaul is
16:29:59 Kirill_ new graphical console interface
16:30:33 Kirill_ i also emplemented it. but will create mr after approve of this spec
16:31:09 Kirill_ in my spec i added all links. also link to new graphical console interface approved spec
16:31:10 sean-k-mooney ok i would liek to see some context in the spec why the existing horizon integration which used to work with nova provisiond server no longer works
16:32:02 sean-k-mooney ok the reaons im asking this i si used ot have ironic deployed with the geniric ipmi driver and shellinabox at home a few years ago and it worked fine in horizon
16:32:16 sean-k-mooney useing a difffent ironic driver ideally shoudl not requrie changed to nova
16:32:31 sean-k-mooney so if we add this new feature i would hope it will work for all ironic drivers
16:32:42 Kirill_ for vnc
16:32:50 Kirill_ we need to create a handshake
16:33:02 Kirill_ for this handshake we need a password from ironic
16:33:21 sean-k-mooney oh the old solution used the serial console proxy
16:33:28 sean-k-mooney not the novnc proxy
16:33:32 sean-k-mooney that the delta
16:33:35 sean-k-mooney ok makes sense
16:33:41 Kirill_ we need a graphical console not serial
16:34:05 sean-k-mooney ack ya just was trying to figure out why this is fiddernt then https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/admin/console.html
16:34:21 sean-k-mooney its the grapical console not serial
16:35:02 Kirill_ it is not the same console as vnc
16:36:22 bauzas sean-k-mooney: Kirill_: could you maybe discuss this in the spec then ?
16:36:30 bauzas or after the meeting ?
16:36:31 Kirill_ ++
16:36:35 bauzas I'm about to end the meeting
16:36:45 bauzas so you can continue to discuss in the IRC channel after
16:37:02 bauzas ok, anyone else having an item to discuss ?
16:37:09 Kirill_ just to sum up. on 15th November we will review all specs (and mine too)?)))
16:38:06 bauzas yes
16:38:41 Kirill_ got it, thanks
16:39:30 bauzas ok, then let's close the meeting
16:39:41 bauzas thanks all

Earlier   Later