Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-10-11
16:09:05 gibi timeout is a the visible fault but there is deeper reasons why that happnes
16:09:28 bauzas ok, so let's continue to have this bug report then
16:09:43 bauzas and if someone wants to fix it, he/she could duplicate it if needed
16:09:57 elodilles ack
16:10:59 bauzas ok, any other bug report to look at ?
16:11:11 elodilles nothing else from me
16:12:52 bauzas ok, continuing then
16:13:09 bauzas gibi: can you be the bug baton for next week ?
16:13:15 gibi lets see
16:13:17 bauzas even if next week it will be the PTG ?
16:13:30 gibi I will take it
16:13:32 bauzas ok
16:13:34 bauzas thanks
16:13:41 bauzas #info bug baton is being passed to gibi
16:13:58 bauzas (sorry, passing it to you, as I was having the baton for 2 weeks :) )
16:14:13 bauzas moving on
16:14:15 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:14:20 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:14:26 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:14:28 bauzas heh :)
16:14:44 bauzas as you see, we have a timeout with the centos9-fips job
16:15:20 bauzas but I dunno for how long it was having this timeout
16:16:20 elodilles https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-centos9-stream-fips&project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0
16:16:28 elodilles it seems always?
16:16:33 bauzas yes
16:17:53 bauzas I guess the owner of the job was adalee, right?.
16:18:40 bauzas this is bizarre, I don't see where the job run is timing out
16:20:01 sean-k-mooney well the default timeout i think is 2 hours
16:20:14 sean-k-mooney so it might just need a little longer sicne the fips job does a reboot
16:20:24 bauzas yeah but the job seems to have done
16:20:30 bauzas be* done
16:20:38 bauzas anyway, nothing urgent
16:20:53 bauzas this is just the fact we can't get the result
16:21:00 bauzas even if it looks tempest works fine
16:21:11 sean-k-mooney its posible it has addtional test in a post playbook
16:21:24 bauzas I don't know who wrote the job
16:21:34 bauzas but I'll try to find it
16:21:46 bauzas should be easy to find
16:22:24 clarkb https://zuul.openstack.org/build/5f6e6a2f65ee4a5e90754d07142fab9f/log/job-output.txt#23945-23946 shows where it is timing out
16:23:24 bauzas found who added it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831844
16:23:54 bauzas thanks clarkb, will look
16:24:31 sean-k-mooney ok its tempest full
16:24:47 sean-k-mooney so its two tempest runs
16:25:05 bauzas | RUN END RESULT_TIMED_OUT: [untrusted : opendev.org/openstack/tempest/playbooks/devstack-tempest.yaml@master]
16:25:09 sean-k-mooney the first one completed but the second that runs the slow test and senarior tests timed out
16:25:10 bauzas hmpf
16:25:24 bauzas yup
16:25:45 sean-k-mooney so ya it just need anther say 30 mins added to the tiemout to be safe
16:26:05 sean-k-mooney it also could have just been a slow node
16:26:10 clarkb and maybe double check logs to see that something didn't get stuck there due to fips
16:26:19 clarkb there is a bit of a time delta between the timeout and tempest reporting anything
16:26:38 clarkb oh its only 15 seconds nevermind
16:26:42 sean-k-mooney yep
16:26:47 sean-k-mooney there isnt really a break in the logs
16:26:53 clarkb I mathed wrong the first time
16:27:08 bauzas yes, this is just a slow test
16:27:42 bauzas but should we modify the timeout for that job to be larger ?
16:27:46 sean-k-mooney i dont know how much time the reboot adds for fips but 2 hours is proably borderlien
16:28:01 bauzas we can DNM this at least
16:28:16 bauzas and verify if adding more timeout time helps
16:28:17 sean-k-mooney i would add 30mins and monitor it and see roughly how long it takes over the next few weeks
16:28:23 bauzas right
16:28:46 bauzas I can propose a patch
16:28:51 sean-k-mooney ack
16:29:21 bauzas #action bauzas to add a 30min more timeout for the centos9-fips periodic job so we will see whether it fixes the timeout
16:29:27 bauzas moving on
16:29:38 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:29:51 sean-k-mooney bauzas: its here https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/zuul.d/integrated-gate.yaml#L325 just incase your wondering where to do that
16:31:19 bauzas ack, thanks but I found it
16:31:40 bauzas hence the DNM patch in nova
16:31:51 bauzas to test it
16:32:07 bauzas with experimental
16:32:10 bauzas anyway
16:32:36 bauzas nothing to tell more about blind rechecks, I haven't looked at the numbers
16:32:38 bauzas moving on
16:32:48 bauzas #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:32:53 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:32:59 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:33:04 bauzas #info Zed GA was last week, kudos to the team.
16:33:10 bauzas we're officially done with Zed :)
16:33:21 bauzas so...
16:33:23 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html
16:33:28 bauzas #info Antelope-1 is planned in 5 weeks
16:33:38 bauzas nothing to tell it, the crux is for the next topic
16:33:50 bauzas #topic PTG planning
16:33:55 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-ptg Antelope PTG etherpad
16:34:00 bauzas #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html PTG schedule
16:34:09 bauzas #info Attempted schedule in the etherpad
16:34:21 bauzas yeah I did a bit of a topics scrambling
16:34:38 bauzas but honestly, we don't have a large agendat *yet*
16:35:04 bauzas I'll just move the nova-otherproject topics
16:35:29 bauzas for the moment, we have nova-neutron (Thur) and nova-ironic (reminder : *Monday*)
16:35:44 bauzas do people want to talk with cinder or other projects ?
16:35:52 bauzas I haven't got any ask from the cyborg project
16:36:05 bauzas or oslo or QA ?
16:36:25 bauzas or manila, or glance... :)
16:36:57 gibi nothing on my side
16:37:04 sean-k-mooney i think the ironic topic will fill any space we give it
16:37:14 sean-k-mooney but im not sure if we will be able to make progress remotely
16:37:57 bauzas hah

Earlier   Later