| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-09-06 | |||
| 16:24:35 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: please just update the bug report with your thoughts please | |
| 16:24:41 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:24:43 | sean-k-mooney | will do | |
| 16:24:47 | bauzas | moving on, we still have lots of things to discuss | |
| 16:25:12 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 9 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:25:18 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (-1 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:25:24 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:25:29 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to Uggla | |
| 16:25:32 | bauzas | that's it for bugs | |
| 16:25:47 | Uggla | yep I will not forget that time. | |
| 16:25:48 | bauzas | (yeah Uggla kindly offered to keep the baton for this week, thanks to him) | |
| 16:26:02 | bauzas | Uggla: no pain here | |
| 16:26:10 | bauzas | this is stretch goal | |
| 16:26:15 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:26:31 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:26:35 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:26:40 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&project=openstack%2Fnova&pipeline=periodic-weekly Centos 9 Stream periodic job status | |
| 16:26:45 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:26:50 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:27:01 | bauzas | I checked all the periodic runs and all are green | |
| 16:27:08 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:27:23 | bauzas | I think we discussed about the current gate bugs, we can move on | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:27:39 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:27:45 | bauzas | #info Zed-3 was last Thursday | |
| 16:27:50 | bauzas | hereby, I declare | |
| 16:27:55 | bauzas | #info FeatureFreeze officially declared today | |
| 16:28:02 | elodilles | \o/ | |
| 16:28:05 | bauzas | #action bauzas to -2 open changes that were having an accepted spec | |
| 16:28:11 | bauzas | #action bauzas to run the script to move specs with merged implementation to 'implemented' | |
| 16:28:21 | bauzas | #link Zed tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status | |
| 16:28:40 | bauzas | we still have some client changes that require reviews | |
| 16:29:25 | bauzas | in theory, we are in client libs freeze too | |
| 16:29:27 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html#z-final-clientlib | |
| 16:29:48 | bauzas | elodilles: what do you think of that ? | |
| 16:30:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Follow up for the PCI in placement series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855185 | |
| 16:30:13 | elodilles | just wanted to warn that we are in freeze period | |
| 16:30:16 | elodilles | for that as well | |
| 16:30:18 | bauzas | shall we stop merging novaclient and OSC patches until next cycle or shall we pretend this never existed and be pragmatic ? | |
| 16:30:21 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Doc follow up for PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855186 | |
| 16:30:47 | bauzas | ok, so releasing wouldn't be acceptable | |
| 16:31:01 | bauzas | but I guess merging patches doesn't create issues | |
| 16:31:09 | sean-k-mooney | we can review but proably hold +w for a week | |
| 16:31:10 | elodilles | well, if patches merges, and new release is needed, then RFE is needed | |
| 16:31:17 | sean-k-mooney | the branches will reopen at RC1 | |
| 16:31:31 | elodilles | so non critical things probably should be postponed to Antelope | |
| 16:32:18 | bauzas | I don't disagree with this, I was just wondering about the difference between holding a merge, and merging without releasing | |
| 16:32:26 | sean-k-mooney | we can alwasy do an early release of novaclient or osc in a few weeks | |
| 16:32:49 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: rc bug fixes is really the only issue | |
| 16:32:52 | gibi | merging without releasing can be confusing for zed as the branch have it but the release does not | |
| 16:32:54 | sean-k-mooney | until we have the branch | |
| 16:33:02 | bauzas | ok, so let's agree to hold our commits | |
| 16:33:03 | sean-k-mooney | we cant merge feature incase there is a bug fix needed | |
| 16:33:11 | sean-k-mooney | branches will be create at rc1 | |
| 16:33:35 | elodilles | bauzas: ++ | |
| 16:33:40 | bauzas | #agreed Client patches are on Client libs freeze, please don't accept to merge new changes until RC1 happens | |
| 16:33:52 | bauzas | voila | |
| 16:33:53 | dansmith | did the rebuild bfv change merge? | |
| 16:34:02 | dansmith | for the client I mean | |
| 16:34:02 | bauzas | the novaclient one, not | |
| 16:34:17 | bauzas | we were reviewing it today, hence my question | |
| 16:34:40 | bauzas | we have novaclient support until 2.92 | |
| 16:34:42 | dansmith | hmm, seems bad to not have that present in the client if we've got it as a server feature | |
| 16:34:49 | bauzas | and OSC support until 2.91 IIRC | |
| 16:35:31 | bauzas | dansmith: fwiw, we have a difference between what the server supports and what the client can negociate | |
| 16:35:31 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: that is why i was suggesting we do a release in a few weeks | |
| 16:35:48 | bauzas | yoga didn't had this issue, no microversion patch was merged | |
| 16:35:56 | bauzas | so, this is my first time :) | |
| 16:36:21 | dansmith | okay, so you're saying we wait for rc1 then do a client release soonly so people will be able to actually use it? | |
| 16:36:28 | sean-k-mooney | its not the first time we have not had parity between api and cli | |
| 16:36:31 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: yep | |
| 16:36:37 | dansmith | okay | |
| 16:36:38 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: at leat that is what im suggesting | |
| 16:36:48 | bauzas | dansmith: I'm not saying anything, I'm asking for help | |
| 16:37:15 | bauzas | if we all agree on the discrepancy, we should also agree on the fact this isn't great | |
| 16:37:29 | dansmith | as long as there's a short timeline to getting the client released then I guess that's okay | |
| 16:37:34 | bauzas | that client libs freeze doesn't really help, fwiw | |
| 16:37:43 | sean-k-mooney | it does | |
| 16:37:46 | sean-k-mooney | normally | |
| 16:37:59 | bauzas | ideally, we should have a one week difference I think between the server freeze and the client freeze | |
| 16:38:09 | dansmith | bauzas: do we not? | |
| 16:38:21 | dansmith | I guess I'm confused, seems like this is the week to get the client things finalized | |
| 16:38:23 | bauzas | dansmith: not in the zed schedule | |
| 16:38:37 | bauzas | hence my call for clarification | |
| 16:38:42 | dansmith | hrm okay | |
| 16:38:54 | dansmith | that | |
| 16:38:57 | dansmith | is a bit of a bummer | |
| 16:39:11 | bauzas | can't disagree | |
| 16:39:25 | dansmith | I dunno what distros do for picking client releases, but they'd need to know that they need the one right after the zed server release to have this | |
| 16:39:28 | dansmith | but whatever | |
| 16:39:35 | sean-k-mooney | feedback i guess for tc/cross project ptg session | |
| 16:39:41 | bauzas | agrred | |
| 16:39:46 | dansmith | I think that's just for the release team | |
| 16:39:57 | bauzas | the antelope schedule is already accepted but I guess we can debate it at the PTG | |
| 16:40:00 | sean-k-mooney | ya perhaps | |
| 16:40:03 | dansmith | we approve the schedule but don't really do much other than that I think | |
| 16:40:30 | sean-k-mooney | well the schdule can be updated if we think it need changes | |
| 16:40:32 | bauzas | just as a hint for next cycle https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | |
| 16:40:34 | sean-k-mooney | its just anohter review | |