Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-06
15:31:27 bauzas what I also understood is that there is no reason to keep a competitive timeslot for the project as a different room
15:32:12 bauzas like, if I was choosing Tuesday 1pm UTC, I should unbook the nova timeslot in the bexar room
15:32:39 bauzas but we'll figure it out
15:32:50 dansmith no,
15:33:26 dansmith I think nova just needs to choose a slot and make sure our schedule lines up for that session during that slot.. I thought it was supposed to be in the nova room, not a separate one
15:34:32 dansmith I guess maybe he just put them in some room in order to lodge the timeslot, but I think it should be rescheduled to our room in that slot
15:34:59 dansmith yeah "projects can convert/reserve them"
15:34:59 bauzas yup, I was about to unbook the nova-placement slot accordingly but reuse this timeslot with the operator-nova-friendly track or whatever this is called
15:35:11 dansmith ack, but in our room
15:36:49 bauzas yup, just explained this in the infra-events chan
15:37:01 bauzas Bexar, this is
15:37:18 bauzas no need to ask our developers to switch rooms
15:40:09 dansmith right
16:00:11 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:11 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 6 16:00:11 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:11 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:11 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:16 bauzas hello everyone
16:00:18 elodilles o/
16:00:26 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:00:46 dansmith o/
16:01:31 bauzas let's start while people arrive
16:01:38 bauzas we have a few things to discuss
16:02:04 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:10 gibi o/
16:02:12 sean-k-mooney o/
16:02:19 bauzas #info Three Critical bugs
16:02:24 bauzas that's a bummer
16:02:36 bauzas but we have a story against each
16:02:41 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988311 See https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030325.html
16:02:49 bauzas seems we have a way forward
16:03:04 bauzas with oslo.concurrency patches
16:03:23 gibi yeah there is a new oslo.concurrency release
16:03:30 bauzas yup
16:03:44 gibi the next step is to get the global version bump
16:03:52 bauzas correct
16:04:00 gibi I will abandon the nova specific patches once we have the bump merged
16:04:28 gibi we have to make sure though that stable/yoga gets the new oslo version too
16:04:37 bauzas yeah
16:04:43 sean-k-mooney i also have patches to fix fastener and update oslo in flight
16:04:48 bauzas I don't see any u-c change yet
16:04:49 sean-k-mooney thos will be for A
16:04:51 sean-k-mooney a this point
16:05:07 Uggla o/
16:05:23 bauzas but I assume this patch will be done sooner than later
16:06:07 gibi yes based on the mail thread Herve will propose the bump
16:06:26 gibi https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030352.html
16:06:36 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (db) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831193
16:06:37 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (objects) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839401
16:06:37 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
16:06:38 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
16:06:38 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (api) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830
16:06:39 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Bump compute version and check shares support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850499
16:06:39 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500
16:06:40 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501
16:06:40 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028
16:06:42 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029
16:06:42 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.power_on_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852084
16:06:44 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.power_off_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852278
16:06:44 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852085
16:06:46 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086
16:06:46 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087
16:06:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823
16:06:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824
16:06:50 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Change microversion to 2.94 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852088
16:06:59 Uggla oops sorry for that ^
16:07:24 bauzas gibi: would you propose a patch to nova's requirements.txt or do we automatically pull the latest ?
16:07:38 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/856044
16:07:39 gibi we are not constrained in noca
16:07:43 gibi nova
16:07:50 sean-k-mooney i think that is the requiremtns bump
16:08:05 bauzas gibi: ok, so we'll benefit from it
16:08:17 gibi yep, automatically
16:08:20 sean-k-mooney we shoudl once that merges yep
16:08:27 bauzas https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/requirements.txt#L34
16:08:33 bauzas yup, we're not constrained
16:08:46 bauzas ok, let's wait for the req patch to be merged then
16:09:11 bauzas for stable/yoga, seems we don't cap too
16:09:12 bauzas https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/yoga/requirements.txt#L30
16:09:26 sean-k-mooney correct
16:09:31 gibi coo
16:09:31 gibi l
16:09:41 sean-k-mooney we can either pull in the latest oslo release there or cap fasterners
16:09:42 bauzas ok, we're on the good way
16:09:55 bauzas moving on to the next bug then
16:10:09 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988316 Will be set to High now that the gate is skipping the test
16:10:17 bauzas people agree with the proposal ?
16:10:23 gibi sean-k-mooney: I would bump this https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/yoga/upper-constraints.txt#L26
16:10:24 bauzas => High
16:10:45 bauzas gibi: oh you're right about yoga's u-c
16:11:32 gibi on the unshelve stuff I think we need a nova fix to return a better error message, but I'm OK to drop it from Critical to High
16:11:40 bauzas yeah
16:11:45 gibi it is not blocking the gate at the moment
16:11:47 bauzas not saying there will be no bug to fix
16:11:51 sean-k-mooney ya its a latent bug
16:12:06 bauzas but this isn't longer critical as the gate is now working back
16:12:07 dansmith unshelve thing meaning the to-host cell one?
16:12:13 sean-k-mooney yes
16:12:15 bauzas yup
16:12:29 bauzas saying we have to restrict to the same cell

Earlier   Later