| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-09-01 | |||
| 16:53:25 | bauzas | remember, we discussed this at the PTG when I pointed out I was off for three weeks | |
| 16:54:06 | gibi | I have to drop, but thanks for the above discussion | |
| 16:54:10 | bauzas | but anyway, I personnally feel another deadline wouldn't have changed the situation | |
| 16:54:28 | gibi | lets continue this on the PTG as part of a retro | |
| 16:54:36 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:54:36 | bauzas | yet again, this was a design concern, being missed at the design state | |
| 16:54:40 | bauzas | stage* | |
| 16:54:43 | dansmith | to be clear, my point about deadlines was that moving to yearly releases would make this a lot worse, not necessarily that more deadlines than we have would *solve* it | |
| 16:54:53 | bauzas | dansmith: oh yeah | |
| 16:54:58 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: yep it would | |
| 17:13:30 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: thanks for the link | |
| 17:38:35 | opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: nova-live-migration tests not needed for Ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855469 | |
| 18:14:03 | opendevreview | Rico Lin proposed openstack/nova master: Add traits for viommu model https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/844507 | |
| 18:14:52 | ricolin | sean-k-mooney: bauzas sorry, a pep8 error, can you approve it again, thanks | |
| 18:15:58 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Heal missing simple PCI allocation in the resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851359 | |
| 18:16:06 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Heal PCI allocation during resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852396 | |
| 18:16:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Heal allocation for same host resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854822 | |
| 18:21:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Handle PCI dev reconf with allocations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852397 | |
| 18:21:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Allow enabling PCI tracking in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850468 | |
| 18:25:40 | dansmith | ricolin: I got you | |
| 18:28:49 | ricolin | thanks dansmith | |
| 18:52:43 | bauzas | ricolin: dansmith: done too | |
| 19:15:04 | bauzas | fwiw, I'm setting Implemented against all blueprints that have their API changes merged but waiting for client patches | |
| 19:15:24 | bauzas | nova in launchpad != novaclient and osc | |
| 19:29:10 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Ignore plug_vifs on the ironic driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821351 | |
| 19:32:00 | bauzas | fwiw, procedural -2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157/16 | |
| 19:35:08 | JayF | Intersesting failure case in stable/yoga CI, I think it's probably something that's actually-broken, but not by my patch: https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_8b1/854257/2/gate/openstack-tox-py39/8b1323f/testr_results.html | |
| 19:35:49 | JayF | Given that all tests that were comparing the contents there are all failing in a similar way, with no human-readable changes | |
| 19:36:02 | sean-k-mooney | JayF i have hit that too | |
| 19:36:07 | sean-k-mooney | on complete unrelated path | |
| 19:36:19 | sean-k-mooney | i cant repodcue it locally for what its worth | |
| 19:36:25 | JayF | are you suggseting I just retry then? | |
| 19:36:44 | sean-k-mooney | let me check if my other one pass after a retry | |
| 19:36:54 | JayF | I can do that, I usually don't pull that lever if it looks nonrandom like this one does, but I don't know enough about nova failure cases to be certain | |
| 19:38:05 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855025 failed agian | |
| 19:38:13 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: same issue | |
| 19:38:19 | sean-k-mooney | and its only on py39 | |
| 19:38:25 | sean-k-mooney | the py36 test passes | |
| 19:38:41 | bauzas | gibi: sean-k-mooney: others, you may be interested in the antelope timeframe https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/850753/5/doc/source/antelope/schedule.rst | |
| 19:38:47 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: so its a real blocker | |
| 19:39:07 | bauzas | gibi: sean-k-mooney: this sounds a shorter development cycle | |
| 19:39:39 | sean-k-mooney | not realted to your patch at all | |
| 19:39:39 | sean-k-mooney | i had t fail on all patches in a 5/6 patch sereis and on the recheck of the first patch | |
| 19:39:39 | sean-k-mooney | so its seams to be repoducabel in ci | |
| 19:45:34 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: i am not sure ill have time to look at that this week but we likely should track that as a stable gate bug. ill try and follow up with elodilles about it next week | |
| 19:46:01 | JayF | When you say "track that as a stable gate bug", what does that mean in practice for Nova? | |
| 19:46:11 | JayF | I know in Ironic, e.g., we have an etherpad we track that in | |
| 19:46:34 | JayF | I'm happy to document the issue; I can't sit here and ask for a bajillion stable reviews without being willing to help with CI somewhat :D | |
| 19:46:40 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: we have an etherpad and we file a bug with gate blocker in the title | |
| 19:46:50 | JayF | Where could I find a link to that etherpad? | |
| 19:46:56 | sean-k-mooney | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 19:47:02 | JayF | ty | |
| 19:48:23 | JayF | bugs in nova are launchpad, not storyboard? | |
| 19:48:41 | JayF | yep looks like it, filing it and will update the etherpad | |
| 19:48:54 | sean-k-mooney | yep launchpad | |
| 19:49:21 | sean-k-mooney | we have as gate-failure tag | |
| 19:56:10 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add vIOMMU device to guest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830646 | |
| 19:57:08 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: https://tinyurl.com/mr3pjzyn | |
| 19:57:24 | JayF | What login would I use for that? | |
| 19:57:29 | JayF | I've not used opensearch yet | |
| 19:57:35 | sean-k-mooney | openstack openstack | |
| 19:57:56 | sean-k-mooney | its basically the same | |
| 19:58:42 | sean-k-mooney | so only 8 hits 6 are me i think but i feel like that might be a limaitaiotn of the query | |
| 19:59:07 | JayF | one of the other two is me lol | |
| 19:59:23 | sean-k-mooney | its shoing in the nova cros job | |
| 19:59:29 | sean-k-mooney | but this job is openstack-tox-py39 | |
| 19:59:40 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont know why that is not showing up | |
| 20:01:22 | JayF | it's going to be extremely hard to make a matcher on this that isn't at least possible it'll catch other stuff | |
| 20:01:32 | JayF | because this is essentially "it looks like a proper unit test failure but just... isn't" | |
| 20:01:48 | sean-k-mooney | nova.tests.unit.cmd.test_manage.UtilitiesTestCase.test_format_dict [0.025453s] ... FAILED | |
| 20:01:55 | sean-k-mooney | i should be able to match on that instead | |
| 20:13:23 | JayF | Yeah, I've read the docs a couple of times, and I can't figure out how to wildcard out the time in the test run search | |
| 20:13:38 | sean-k-mooney | same i think im going to give up for now | |
| 20:15:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for 2023.1 Antelope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/851007 | |
| 21:09:22 | opendevreview | Sofia Enriquez proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Check NFS protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854030 | |
| 21:28:12 | opendevreview | Sofia Enriquez proposed openstack/nova master: Check NFS protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854030 | |
| 21:57:41 | JayF | I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988482 and am documenting it in that etherpad now. | |
| 21:59:06 | JayF | let me know if there's anything I can do to help resolve it, I am a little behind on my usual stuff due to being out sick earlier this week, but if it's not picked up by early next week I might see if I can figure it out | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-09-02 | |||
| 00:26:49 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add traits for viommu model https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/844507 | |
| 07:12:36 | gibi | bauzas: yeah, I saw the schedule but did not pondered much about it. I will be busy with downstream stuff at least until end of this year or potentially until next summer. That will have more impact on my AA contribution than the AA schedule has | |
| 07:19:19 | bauzas | gibi: sure, but that means we have less time for features this cycle | |
| 07:22:16 | gibi | yes we will have less review bandwidth in the team and sorter cycle | |
| 07:32:20 | gibi | we have couple of in progress features (image encryption, manila support, PCI in placement) if we could finish those in AA that would be totally enough for me | |
| 07:33:50 | gibi | I will not push for the neutron based sriov support in placement feature in AA. I probably baby sitt the remaining parts of the flavor based PCI in placement feature (basically the scheduling part) | |
| 08:20:38 | opendevreview | Justas Poderys proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Improve multiqueue network adapter support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855514 | |
| 08:29:27 | opendevreview | Justas Poderys proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Improve multiqueue network adapter support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855514 | |
| 08:32:28 | opendevreview | Justas Poderys proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Improve multiqueue network adapter support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855514 | |
| 08:52:17 | opendevreview | Justas Poderys proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Improve multiqueue network adapter support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855514 | |
| 09:31:00 | sean-k-mooney1 | gibi: you have a pci spec updte i assume that will describe what is complted in zed and what is left | |
| 09:31:10 | sean-k-mooney1 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855218 | |
| 09:31:23 | gibi | sean-k-mooney1: I have a -1 on it to add a note that the scheduling part is not landed | |
| 09:31:36 | sean-k-mooney1 | so will we mark the blueprint as implemnted nad redefien the scope | |
| 09:31:42 | sean-k-mooney1 | ack | |
| 09:31:44 | gibi | that is a good question | |
| 09:32:03 | gibi | I'm not sure I want to create a separate spec for the scheduling part | |
| 09:32:10 | gibi | that would need a lot of context building in the spec | |
| 09:32:20 | gibi | I would keep the whole thing in a single doc | |
| 09:32:32 | gibi | bauzas, sean-k-mooney: how do you feel about it? | |
| 09:32:41 | sean-k-mooney | well we will need to copy it to the right repo | |
| 09:32:45 | gibi | sure | |