| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-08-31 | |||
| 14:42:36 | dansmith | okay | |
| 14:42:51 | gibi | file the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988316 | |
| 14:43:05 | gibi | as it is blocks the gate I will set it to Critical | |
| 14:43:17 | dansmith | also, the api config I was looking at was on the compute, the controller is pointed at cell0 by default | |
| 14:43:25 | dansmith | gibi: ++ | |
| 14:43:28 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: does the tempest test have a compute_feature_flag or will i just add it to the exclude regex | |
| 14:43:34 | gibi | and I will push the skip | |
| 14:43:38 | gibi | to unblock the gate | |
| 14:43:45 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok | |
| 14:43:52 | sean-k-mooney | ill leave it to you so | |
| 14:44:11 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: exclude the test | |
| 14:44:38 | gmann | gibi: ok, I was doing but please you go ahead | |
| 14:45:15 | gibi | ack, I'm on it | |
| 14:45:17 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney and I can get our +2 hammers polished up | |
| 14:45:17 | gmann | gibi: we can add test class name in case more test are added for this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/devstack/nova-multi-cell-exclude-list.txt | |
| 14:45:55 | sean-k-mooney | ya UnshelveToHostMultiNodesTest | |
| 14:46:09 | sean-k-mooney | or tempest.api.compute.admin.test_servers_on_multinodes.UnshelveToHostMultiNodesTest | |
| 14:46:20 | sean-k-mooney | if we want to fully quallify it | |
| 14:48:20 | gibi | dansmith: would the current code fail to found the compute even if it is the same cell of the instance as it does not target the cell? | |
| 14:48:41 | dansmith | gibi: I think it has to be targeting the cell | |
| 14:48:47 | sean-k-mooney | it seamed to work for the host it started on | |
| 14:48:50 | gibi | I don't see where it targets it | |
| 14:48:54 | dansmith | I know it's not clear but it wouldn't be getting as far as it is if not | |
| 14:49:20 | sean-k-mooney | its presumably targeting the source cell and not finding the dest host | |
| 14:49:42 | dansmith | I confirmed it's using cell0 by default, which means it must be getting targeted | |
| 14:50:01 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok | |
| 14:52:19 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (db) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831193 | |
| 14:52:20 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (objects) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839401 | |
| 14:52:20 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194 | |
| 14:52:21 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090 | |
| 14:52:21 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (api) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830 | |
| 14:52:22 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Bump compute version and check shares support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850499 | |
| 14:52:22 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500 | |
| 14:52:23 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501 | |
| 14:52:24 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028 | |
| 14:52:24 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029 | |
| 14:52:26 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.power_on_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852084 | |
| 14:52:26 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.power_off_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852278 | |
| 14:52:28 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852085 | |
| 14:52:28 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086 | |
| 14:52:30 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087 | |
| 14:52:30 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823 | |
| 14:52:32 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824 | |
| 14:52:32 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Change microversion to 2.93 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852088 | |
| 14:52:39 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Skip UnshelveToHostMultiNodesTest in nova-multi-cell https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855378 | |
| 14:52:56 | gibi | gmann, dansmith, sean-k-mooney: here is the skip ^^ | |
| 14:54:06 | sean-k-mooney | do we still use that file | |
| 14:54:39 | gibi | dansmith: in the rest api code we load the instance properly from its cell could that codepath alter the context too? | |
| 14:54:40 | sean-k-mooney | oh we do | |
| 14:54:58 | dansmith | no, because we're doing scatter | |
| 14:54:59 | gmann | yes | |
| 14:55:00 | dansmith | so actually | |
| 14:55:09 | dansmith | I think gibi might be right and that the feature itself is broken | |
| 14:55:27 | dansmith | but I can't explain why it's working on single-cell, since we're targeted to cell0 by default | |
| 14:55:35 | dansmith | it looks like we don't target until we hit superconductor | |
| 14:55:48 | dansmith | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/cbc9b516fb5e6b079b57cc40380e1d730751cd6c/nova/conductor/manager.py#L974-L975 | |
| 14:56:22 | dansmith | so I can't explain why this ever works, because the api should have only checked for the host being present in cell0, which should never have any hosts | |
| 14:56:33 | gibi | I think I see where we target the context | |
| 14:56:34 | gibi | _get_instance_from_cell | |
| 14:56:37 | gibi | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/3862cfc649d0099971c91d17e6f8800d10712a26/nova/compute/api.py#L2867-L2870 | |
| 14:56:44 | gibi | this actually has a side effect to alter the context | |
| 14:57:15 | dansmith | ah, yep, okay I missed that | |
| 14:57:19 | dansmith | phew :) | |
| 14:57:20 | gibi | so unshelve actually works within a cell | |
| 14:57:39 | gibi | we need to document that it does not work across cells and it need to emit a better error | |
| 14:57:50 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 14:58:09 | sean-k-mooney | ya although that proably a latent bug | |
| 14:58:20 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. if we use the old way of targeting an az | |
| 14:58:26 | sean-k-mooney | and that az was in a differnt cell | |
| 14:58:32 | sean-k-mooney | it likely would have failed in teh same place | |
| 14:58:42 | dansmith | latent bug in terms of raising a useful error you mean? | |
| 14:58:47 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 14:58:50 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 14:58:59 | sean-k-mooney | its just now that we have a tempest test that hits it we are seeing it | |
| 14:59:17 | sean-k-mooney | but we proably were not doing cross az unshelve in the multi cell job | |
| 15:00:47 | gibi | I've update the bug | |
| 15:00:56 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: can you +W the skip so it's headed in after tests? | |
| 15:01:10 | dansmith | or gmann | |
| 15:01:54 | gibi | Uggla: probably the above discussion about unshelve is interesting to you too ;) | |
| 15:01:58 | gibi | Uggla: also https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988316 :) | |
| 15:03:31 | gmann | dansmith: gibi done | |
| 15:03:36 | gibi | gmann: thanks | |
| 15:03:45 | dansmith | sweet | |
| 15:04:05 | gmann | I think its worth to add multi-cell jo on tempest side too and check the new tests for cross-cell thigns | |
| 15:04:09 | gmann | job | |
| 15:04:16 | gmann | I will do | |
| 15:04:44 | gibi | nah then we had the necessary gate block at FF week done | |
| 15:06:02 | gibi | could have been worse | |
| 15:06:31 | gmann | ? did not get | |
| 15:06:48 | gmann | you mean we should not add in tempest gate ? | |
| 15:06:59 | gibi | nah I'm just joking | |
| 15:07:00 | dansmith | I believe gibi is being funny :) | |
| 15:07:08 | gmann | :) | |
| 15:07:18 | gibi | so we tend to break the gate during FF as we are rushing | |
| 15:07:19 | dansmith | but in all seriousness, gmann adding multicell to tempest gate might be a bit heavy and nova-centric | |
| 15:07:30 | dansmith | not sure it's really necessary | |
| 15:07:36 | dansmith | maybe in experimental or something | |
| 15:07:47 | gmann | yeah experimental is good idea | |
| 15:09:23 | bauzas | add this in periodic | |
| 15:09:28 | bauzas | periodic-weelky | |