Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-23
16:11:41 gibi #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:12:11 gibi as a note the current nova-next instability could have been caught if we had stopped using blind rechecks :/
16:12:29 gibi anything else about the master gate status?
16:12:35 JayF I have a change, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853529, which should help with Ironic changes by not running nova-live-migration tests if only Ironic driver is modified. This should help conserve resources and prevent rechecks by avoiding the tests that can't be broken by Ironic. It's my intention to backport this if/when merged. It only needs one additional
16:12:38 JayF core vote.
16:13:07 gibi JayF: cool added to my list, I will check it after the meeting
16:13:14 JayF thank you gibi, I appreciate it.
16:13:31 gibi anything else gate related?
16:13:34 sean-k-mooney just yor revert
16:13:34 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854132
16:13:34 sean-k-mooney if we can merge that before it wedges the gate it would be good
16:13:34 sean-k-mooney we have 40 hits today
16:14:47 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes, we need melwitt or gmann or stephenfin to look at it and approve the revert
16:15:06 sean-k-mooney or dansmith if your about
16:15:50 dansmith looking
16:16:05 gibi thanks
16:16:12 gibi anything else about the gate?
16:16:40 dansmith got it
16:16:59 sean-k-mooney i dont think so
16:17:10 sean-k-mooney i have not see any other recurrent failures
16:17:22 gibi ack, moving on
16:17:29 gibi #topic Release Planning
16:17:35 gibi #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:17:39 gibi #info Zed-3 is in 1 weeks
16:17:43 gibi #link Zed tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status
16:17:47 gibi #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-microversions-plan
16:18:08 gibi please update the https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status etherpad with the status of your work
16:19:07 gibi and if you have someting that blocking your progress then raise it
16:20:15 gibi is there any specific bp we want to talk about today?
16:22:40 gibi I see that https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/volume-backed-server-rebuild+status:open is green but lacking core review
16:23:14 dansmith I initially did a bunch of review on it,
16:23:25 dansmith but was hoping to get another core to have fresh eyes on it before we merge
16:23:38 sean-k-mooney the tempet test is red is that related to teh testcases they are adding
16:23:43 dansmith so I'm good to +W that if someone else looks it over, but I had my hands all in it, so I think that'd be better
16:23:57 dansmith sean-k-mooney: is it? it was passing at one point
16:24:00 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: [ironic] Minimize window for a resource provider to be lost https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853540
16:24:09 gibi it is behind https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/update-userdata+status:open where I need to go back and re-review. after that I might be able to look at the rebuild sets but no hard promises
16:24:27 sean-k-mooney well some of the jobs on the tempest repo are red but i dont know if the new ones worked
16:24:55 dansmith the runs logs are too old, so it needs a recheck
16:25:22 sean-k-mooney ack shall i do it or have you already done it
16:25:29 dansmith I done did it
16:25:34 sean-k-mooney cool
16:25:52 dansmith seems unlikely to merge at this late date if it's behind something else for a microversion,
16:25:55 dansmith but that kinda sucks because a lot was done on it
16:26:08 dansmith so if someone has time to look that'd be nice, maybe we can FFE it if we need
16:26:20 sean-k-mooney well it coudl be merge ahead of the other patch
16:26:41 sean-k-mooney we might want to swap them since there is an openquestion on the update user data pathc
16:26:54 gibi I have the intention to go back the the update user_data patch (that is the next microversion) and also melwitt reviewe that before
16:26:58 dansmith it's a cross-project thing where cinder has done a bunch of work to enable it, so it definitely sucks to cause them to miss again
16:27:01 gibi so we might be able to unblock the it
16:27:04 dansmith already missed last cycle, IIRC
16:27:35 sean-k-mooney dansmith: there is only one patch in the other fature to merge
16:27:45 sean-k-mooney but yes it woudl be shame if it missed
16:28:05 dansmith okay well if we can get someone to look it over while we decide or work on the other, that'd be cool
16:28:10 dansmith maybe melwitt would want to look at it
16:28:40 gibi ack
16:29:16 gibi any other bp to raise?
16:30:15 sean-k-mooney am jsut i think the teanat id one is likely not going to land
16:30:38 gibi it is in merge conflict since we merged the unittest.mock change ~3weeks ago
16:30:39 sean-k-mooney dansmith: i kind of lost track of the SRBAC stuff are there any reverts that still need to land for that
16:30:49 dansmith um
16:31:08 sean-k-mooney its not really a blue print but basically is there any work we need to have in zed
16:31:14 dansmith I think it merged underneath something from gmann
16:31:22 sean-k-mooney ok
16:32:01 dansmith but I'm not seeing it actually
16:32:17 dansmith nope: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848021
16:32:32 dansmith that one and the one above
16:32:48 sean-k-mooney ack so those should be set as a review priorty to land for zed
16:32:56 dansmith maybe we can get gmann to +2 that and someone else to ack it, yeah
16:33:34 sean-k-mooney is gmann on pto i have not spoken to them in a few days
16:33:57 dansmith I think something is keeping him busy, but he was around the last few days a little
16:34:04 gibi I added that rbac stuff to the tracking etherpad
16:34:10 dansmith gibi: thanks
16:34:51 sean-k-mooney i think thats the main set that we needed to talk about
16:35:18 gibi ack then moving on
16:35:28 gibi #topic Review priorities
16:35:33 gibi #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:35:56 gibi looks fairly relevant
16:36:06 gibi #topic Stable Branches
16:36:14 gibi elodilles: any news from stable/
16:36:15 gibi ?
16:36:20 elodilles yepp
16:36:24 elodilles #info stable/train was unblocked last week (with the backport of the patch that migrated jobs to zuul v3)
16:36:40 elodilles #info now only stable/stein (and older) are blocked: grenade and other devstack based jobs fail with the same timeout issue as stable/train was previously
16:36:50 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:37:19 sean-k-mooney elodilles i think there is an issue with cliff on yoga and older by the way
16:37:30 sean-k-mooney more for cilometer then us
16:37:32 elodilles sean-k-mooney: is it? :-o
16:37:49 sean-k-mooney but cliff 4. something droped python 3.6 support
16:37:59 sean-k-mooney so centos 8 stream jobs are failing
16:38:13 sean-k-mooney i did see it on stable/victoria on nova however if i am rememebring correctly
16:38:17 elodilles isn't that non-voting?
16:38:35 elodilles i mean in that case it's not blocking the gate
16:38:47 sean-k-mooney not for nova
16:39:09 sean-k-mooney i work with peopel that work on ceilometer that are trigng to fix it for there jobs
16:39:23 sean-k-mooney just mentioning it as an fyi incase you see stabel review related to it
16:39:41 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks, i'll look into that
16:40:09 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/854130
16:40:34 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ++
16:40:59 elodilles i've noted that patch

Earlier   Later