| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-08-16 | |||
| 16:18:48 | elodilles | but let's go through of them | |
| 16:18:57 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:19:04 | elodilles | #info stable/train (and older) are blocked, see details in the etherpad ^^^ | |
| 16:19:22 | elodilles | #info train probably can be "fixed" by changing grenade & nova-live-migration to zuul v3 job: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795435 | |
| 16:19:51 | sean-k-mooney | that sound like a good thing in general | |
| 16:19:52 | elodilles | i've digged up that old patch that was -1'd by me ^^^ | |
| 16:20:01 | gibi | nice | |
| 16:20:24 | elodilles | rebased it and it seems to be working | |
| 16:20:30 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:20:43 | sean-k-mooney | i assume the orginal objection was changing form zullv2 to zuul v3 | |
| 16:20:46 | sean-k-mooney | after it was released | |
| 16:20:54 | elodilles | (i mean, with the intermittent failures - volume operations timeout) | |
| 16:21:09 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes | |
| 16:21:25 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: and at that time it was not really needed for train | |
| 16:21:45 | sean-k-mooney | ack so now that it is are you ok to proceed in this direction? | |
| 16:22:01 | elodilles | but now, somehow it seems it is not facing with the issue we have with the old devstack-gate jobs | |
| 16:22:10 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes | |
| 16:22:20 | elodilles | and that means we can unblock train at least | |
| 16:22:21 | sean-k-mooney | ack then ill try and find time to review it | |
| 16:22:47 | elodilles | stein rocky and queens will be still blocked, though | |
| 16:22:55 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ++ | |
| 16:23:13 | elodilles | but probably we can even EOL those branches | |
| 16:23:26 | elodilles | as there are no interested parties around those branches :/ | |
| 16:23:35 | gibi | yeah it seems | |
| 16:23:47 | elodilles | anyway, this is all i think | |
| 16:24:56 | gibi | thanks elodilles | |
| 16:25:02 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:25:04 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:25:09 | gibi | there is noting on the agenda | |
| 16:25:16 | gibi | so speak up now if you have someting | |
| 16:25:37 | elodilles | - | |
| 16:26:28 | gibi | dont be so negative elodilles ;) | |
| 16:26:38 | elodilles | gibi: ++ | |
| 16:26:39 | elodilles | :D | |
| 16:26:40 | JayF | Hey Nova folks; I have a reasonably old Ironic driver backport to stable/victoria, I just found out someone has an install that could use it, if we could land it, I'd appreciate it. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800873 (elodilles reviewed it a while back, but I didn't update it for a while because I was between openstack-y jobs) | |
| 16:26:50 | JayF | whoops, didn't mean to send that until the meeting was over, sorry | |
| 16:27:17 | gibi | JayF: that is a good open discussion topic so no worries :) | |
| 16:28:04 | gibi | JayF: I will hit that tomorrow morning and I hope elodilles will do it too | |
| 16:28:34 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: looks like its already merged in stable wallaby | |
| 16:28:38 | JayF | thank you both very much! I will be doing a review of anything that might need backporting to victoria. If that one merges, you might get more :) | |
| 16:28:41 | sean-k-mooney | and that the victoria backport | |
| 16:28:46 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont think that is contoverial | |
| 16:29:25 | sean-k-mooney | the ci logs are mising but they were green | |
| 16:29:47 | JayF | That's what I'm hoping, but I know folks are busy and getting attention is often the difficult part. Just had no real reason to promote it until I met an Ironic user today who is having this specific issue and is already mid-upgrade to Victoria :) | |
| 16:29:47 | sean-k-mooney | so provide this does not need a rebase i think we can just review it as normal | |
| 16:30:06 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:30:24 | sean-k-mooney | ill add it to my list | |
| 16:32:01 | gibi | I feel we are done with the today's meeting | |
| 16:32:06 | gibi | thank you all for joining | |
| 16:32:08 | gibi | #endmeeting | |
| 16:32:08 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 16 16:32:08 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:32:08 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-16-16.00.html | |
| 16:32:08 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-16-16.00.txt | |
| 16:32:08 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-08-16-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:32:32 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: its a clean cherry pick and the previous branch is already merged so +2 | |
| 16:33:23 | sean-k-mooney | its been a month since zuul last ran but we have not been merging code to victoria much so i expect this should still apply | |
| 16:33:37 | JayF | I'll watch it, if it kicks out V-2 I will take a look | |
| 16:36:03 | elodilles | JayF: thanks for the update, +2'd it | |
| 16:36:32 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: care to +w too | |
| 16:36:51 | sean-k-mooney | or did you want to hold if for some reason | |
| 16:37:19 | sean-k-mooney | also do assert not fire in our functional tests by default | |
| 16:39:52 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: nope, just haven't seen that you +2'd already :) but we can wait for the tests to pass again | |
| 16:40:07 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:40:13 | sean-k-mooney | oh gibi rechecked | |
| 16:40:25 | sean-k-mooney | just saw that now | |
| 16:40:58 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: on the other hand, +W probably doesn't hurt, so that it can merge quicker (and we won't forget about +W it later) | |
| 16:41:02 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yeah I kicked it as I figured I will look at it tomorrow but if you are both agree I trust you so feel free to +A it | |
| 16:41:24 | sean-k-mooney | well the ci will reject it if there is an issue | |
| 16:41:32 | sean-k-mooney | but we can take a look later anyway | |
| 16:41:43 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: what do you mean by the functional test thing? | |
| 16:42:01 | sean-k-mooney | im debuging why one of my func tests is not working | |
| 16:42:12 | sean-k-mooney | i think the libvirt fixture is incomplete | |
| 16:42:27 | sean-k-mooney | and its not setting something that is always set with real libvirt | |
| 16:42:39 | sean-k-mooney | but my assert is not firing so i think the funciton im looking at is mocked | |
| 16:44:19 | elodilles | but i guess that's a different patch (on master branch?) | |
| 16:44:48 | sean-k-mooney | yes differnt patch | |
| 16:45:04 | sean-k-mooney | its what i was lookign at before the meeting started | |
| 16:45:32 | sean-k-mooney | if dev_path not in (None, ''): | |
| 16:45:33 | elodilles | i see, i thought you want to -W this patch due to some failure, but then it's a different thing | |
| 16:45:34 | sean-k-mooney | raise TypeError() | |
| 16:45:36 | sean-k-mooney | assert dev_path not in (None, ''), ( | |
| 16:45:38 | sean-k-mooney | "dev_path is required to be a non empty path " | |
| 16:45:40 | sean-k-mooney | f"called with: {dev_path}") | |
| 16:45:42 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 16:45:48 | sean-k-mooney | so the assert there has no effect in our functional tests | |
| 16:45:55 | sean-k-mooney | but adding the raise breaks them | |
| 16:46:08 | sean-k-mooney | so at least i know the fucntion is being called but asserts are off | |
| 16:46:28 | sean-k-mooney | i had expected tox/stestr to trun asserts on by default | |
| 16:46:33 | sean-k-mooney | i wonder if we should change that | |
| 16:47:06 | sean-k-mooney | and jsut to be 100% clear the ironic patch looks fine no reason to -w | |
| 16:47:25 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ack | |
| 16:49:25 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: i haven't used 'assert', ussually self.assert* is used everywhere | |
| 16:50:36 | sean-k-mooney | i wanted to put it in real code rather then in the tests | |
| 16:50:47 | sean-k-mooney | but its fine this is just for me to fidn where its broken | |
| 16:51:54 | elodilles | oh, i thought you added it in a functional test | |
| 16:53:28 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: interesing find. I agree that we should turn on assert in func test | |
| 17:27:52 | JayF | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800873 seems to have cleared CI; if someone wants to toss a workflow+ on it | |
| 17:59:25 | mloza2 | hi, is there way for nova to autostart specific VMs when compute comes up from a crash? | |
| 18:04:18 | melwitt | gibi: ack re: triage this week, I will do it. thanks! | |
| 18:24:55 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i think there is a python debug envar or something like that to enable them in a non interactive interperter | |