| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-06-28 | |||
| 16:05:03 | gibi | do we have somebody here for the todays nova meeting to talk about specific things? (if not then we can close this) | |
| 16:05:39 | bauzas | we still have one critical bug | |
| 16:05:41 | elodilles | nothing special news from stable point of view, so - | |
| 16:06:05 | bauzas | I can be the bug baton owner for the next week | |
| 16:06:28 | bauzas | that said, next week we will have a spec review day | |
| 16:06:38 | bauzas | I'll email it | |
| 16:06:49 | bauzas | that's it for me | |
| 16:07:21 | gibi | nothing from me I spent most of the week downstream | |
| 16:07:28 | bauzas | #info Next bug baton is still for bauzas | |
| 16:07:37 | bauzas | #info One Critical bug | |
| 16:07:46 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 8 new untriaged bugs (-4 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:07:51 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+1 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:07:54 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010108 new Placement bug | |
| 16:08:01 | bauzas | but I'll tell it again next week | |
| 16:08:17 | bauzas | #info Spec review day on July 5th | |
| 16:08:32 | bauzas | that's basically it | |
| 16:08:40 | gibi | I guess in the critical bug we keep the job non-votig while waiting for the fix to be released in centos stream 9 | |
| 16:08:55 | bauzas | gibi: yeah, we'll discuss about it next week | |
| 16:08:59 | gibi | ok | |
| 16:09:07 | bauzas | I have a concern about the centos 9 stream job | |
| 16:09:07 | gibi | then I think we can close early today | |
| 16:09:13 | bauzas | ok, then | |
| 16:09:42 | bauzas | #agreed given we don't have quorum for this meeting, let's punt it for this week until next week | |
| 16:09:59 | bauzas | #info remember we'll have a spec review day next week | |
| 16:10:08 | bauzas | that's it, thanks | |
| 16:10:10 | bauzas | #endmeetingh | |
| 16:10:12 | bauzas | meh | |
| 16:10:14 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:10:14 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jun 28 16:10:14 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:10:14 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-06-28-16.00.html | |
| 16:10:14 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-06-28-16.00.txt | |
| 16:10:14 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-06-28-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:10:17 | bauzas | even | |
| 16:11:32 | gibi | have a nice evening folks | |
| 16:11:39 | elodilles | you too o/ | |
| 16:15:30 | Uggla | bauzas, already done ! | |
| 16:15:51 | bauzas | Uggla: yeah we didn't had a quorum | |
| 16:16:16 | Uggla | oh ok. | |
| 16:27:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement master: Replace deprecated assertRaisesRegexp https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/817365 | |
| 16:55:51 | bauzas | gibi: sean-k-mooney: Uggla: others: I forgot to tell I'll be on PTO tomorrow | |
| 16:57:38 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ok | |
| 19:47:27 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Remove system scope from all APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848021 | |
| 19:47:45 | dansmith | gmann: ^ passes unit tests locally for me, we'll see what happens in functional | |
| 19:47:54 | dansmith | also, side note | |
| 19:48:05 | dansmith | I'm f**king tired of policy stuff | |
| 19:49:18 | gmann | dansmith: thanks for that. I was also fixing some unit tests but functional test will be good i think. | |
| 19:49:30 | gmann | dansmith: agree, same here on policy stuff. | |
| 19:49:42 | dansmith | ack, it would be GREAT if I don't have to mess with functional failures | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-06-29 | |||
| 07:25:01 | gibi | bauzas: enjoyt | |
| 18:01:25 | opendevreview | Mauricio Faria de Oliveira proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [stable-only] libvirt: UEFI: pc: prefer non-secureboot loaders https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828979 | |
| 18:05:43 | mfo | dansmith, implemented your suggestions/patch approach from some time ago ^ for when / if you have a chance; this is not urgent at all. thanks! | |
| 18:07:16 | dansmith | mfo: okay, all that context has dropped out of my head in the months since we had that, but.. will add it to the list | |
| 22:08:09 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Test attached volume extend actions in the nova-next job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843700 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-06-30 | |||
| 07:32:45 | gibi | good morning | |
| 08:10:23 | bauzas | good morning | |
| 08:10:59 | bauzas | gibi: actually, yesterday I was organizing a birthday party for my daughter with 8 of her friends :) | |
| 08:11:24 | bauzas | not sure I "enjoyed" it :D | |
| 08:31:00 | Uggla | bauzas, still alive ? :) | |
| 09:57:17 | gibi | bauzas, Uggla: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdrs3gr_GAs ? :) | |
| 11:36:39 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: portal is a great game | |
| 11:36:48 | gibi | indeed | |
| 11:37:00 | sean-k-mooney | by the way i watched your summit video | |
| 11:37:09 | sean-k-mooney | live demos are fun | |
| 11:37:21 | sean-k-mooney | did you restack live on stage | |
| 11:37:37 | sean-k-mooney | you said you rebooted the vm but devstack does not survie reboots anymore | |
| 11:37:57 | sean-k-mooney | since there are ordering issues with the systemd service files | |
| 11:54:10 | gibi | I restarted the devstack VM, but did not restack it. It worked:D | |
| 11:59:35 | sean-k-mooney | maybe the issues have been fixed | |
| 12:00:12 | sean-k-mooney | the wsgi service used to race with appache i think and there was an issue with the /run dirs being created | |
| 12:00:21 | sean-k-mooney | you could get lucky | |
| 12:00:34 | sean-k-mooney | but often the service woudl not start cleanly | |
| 12:05:25 | gibi | I never seen that issue locally | |
| 12:05:31 | gibi | but meh | |
| 12:06:31 | sean-k-mooney | its been a while since i tried it honestly | |
| 12:06:47 | sean-k-mooney | like 18.04 era | |
| 13:44:43 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: was i imaginign it or did you have an implementation of removing the ssh key pair generation | |
| 13:44:55 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i was going to go review it today but i cant find it | |
| 13:45:23 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i was hopign we could get that closed out to remove it form the list of thing we need to finish this cycle | |
| 13:46:39 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: speaking of things i would like to clsoe out can you review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847001 | |
| 13:49:03 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: it would be nice if you could reivew this too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833411 i would like to keep that backport series moving along | |
| 13:50:15 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: on it | |
| 13:51:34 | sean-k-mooney | thanks | |
| 13:57:45 | sean-k-mooney | im also going to rebase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830829 shortly once i run and fix the functional tests | |
| 13:58:08 | sean-k-mooney | tja twill be a nice easy win we defered it last cycle because it was too close to FF | |
| 13:58:23 | sean-k-mooney | so i would like to try an land it by m2 | |
| 13:58:42 | sean-k-mooney | mainly to catch any ci fallout if there is any | |
| 14:01:11 | sean-k-mooney | the benifit of me running test locally on my laptop instead of my home server is it takes a while and i do code reviews while im waiting | |
| 14:02:09 | mfo | dansmith, hey! sorry, i couldn't get back to you yesterday ("context dropped out"). most certainly.. the long delay/lost context is on me :/ | |
| 14:02:19 | mfo | so, briefly: in victoria/ussuri one can set `hw_firmware_type=uefi` and the VM won't boot if the UEFI ovmf firmware/loader picked is the secureboot one (*.secboot.fd), as the default `hw_machine_type=pc` doesn't support it (that needs `q35`). | |
| 14:02:30 | mfo | so we should *try* other firmware/loader files, or use .secboot.fd anyway if its' the only one that exists (not to break/change from what is done in this old/stable branch). | |
| 14:02:41 | mfo | This was a suggestion from sean-k-mooney, and also to have unit tests. | |
| 14:02:47 | mfo | Your suggestions were 1) to convert the list of firmware/loader paths to constants (so to intentionally "break" any downstream stable consumers that possibly patched that, so they'd be aware of the change and review their version), and 2) change the patch approach to not even iterate the list of firmware/loader files with .secboot.fd if we're on PC machine type. (I just combined it with, "ok, use it if it's the only one" per Sean's | |
| 14:02:47 | mfo | suggestion too). | |
| 14:03:51 | sean-k-mooney | i think i basicaly said sort so that its last in the list and if its the only one then use it and maybe it will work | |
| 14:03:51 | mfo | I guess that's what this is about and where we are. :) | |
| 14:03:58 | sean-k-mooney | rahter then deleteing it form the list | |
| 14:04:35 | mfo | sean-k-mooney, yup. this is currently how it is, but the for-loop doesn't have a `break` in case it finds one, so the last file is used. | |
| 14:04:35 | sean-k-mooney | but yes sercure boot need uefi | |
| 14:05:06 | mfo | i could just add a break in there, but this would change things / file end up chosen in the general case, i guess. | |
| 14:05:11 | sean-k-mooney | so it wont work with hw_machine_type=pc` | |