| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-03 | |||
| 13:41:07 | kashyap | (When you get a moment, i.e.) | |
| 13:41:34 | gibi | kashyap: will look | |
| 13:42:17 | sean-k-mooney | artom: in principal the openstack pupet modules are ment to be multi distro and also not ooo specific but because of redhats in vovlement in them that is not always the case | |
| 13:46:09 | kashyap | No one is stopping other distros to add support for it | |
| 13:46:29 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: On the flip side, sometimes RHT folks do plenty work for other distros too. (All in good faith) | |
| 13:47:26 | kashyap | My general point is, we should not expect any one distro vendor to do the enablement work for other distros | |
| 13:47:32 | kashyap | (Modulo exceptions) | |
| 13:47:45 | artom | kashyap, done | |
| 13:49:13 | kashyap | Thx; will look | |
| 13:50:45 | kashyap | artom: On double-negation, I agree in general. But in this case, IMO the "skip" wording is more explicit. And it isn't _that_ big of a cognitive burden :) | |
| 13:51:12 | gibi | kashyap: done too, I have no blocking issue just a question about deprecation of the config option | |
| 13:51:37 | artom | kashyap, yeah, it's not a hill I'm going to die on, but I wanted to raise the point | |
| 13:51:46 | kashyap | artom: Yeah, fair point for sure | |
| 13:52:10 | kashyap | gibi: Yeah, good point on deprecation. I'll think a bit more on it | |
| 13:52:16 | kashyap | Will answer there. Thx, both | |
| 13:56:03 | chayan | Hi everyone, I have python knowledge but do not have a cs background .....can you give me an idea of which cs topics/subject or others may be pre requisites for understanding the openstack-nova project? thanks | |
| 13:59:24 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow unshelve to a specific host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/831506 | |
| 14:13:11 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: Allow Manila shares to be directly attached to instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/833669 | |
| 14:21:37 | kashyap | chayan: One area coulbe to to understand how virtual machines are configured (particularly KVM, QEMU, or even other "hypervisors" like Xen, etc) | |
| 14:25:09 | kashyap | chayan: Also please look at the links we (including bauzas) have posted already earlier in the day. (The contributor, getting started, etc docs) | |
| 14:25:56 | chayan | sure thanks a lot for the help ... I am already going through the links you guys gave me ... thanks again | |
| 14:35:41 | opendevreview | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add a workaround to skip compareCPU() on destination https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838926 | |
| 14:35:48 | kashyap | artom: gibi: Fixed --^ | |
| 14:41:16 | gibi | Uggla: commented on the Manial spec. thanks for the state diagram, it helped me to ask more questions :) | |
| 14:42:13 | Uggla | gibi, not sure this is a good news for me. :) | |
| 14:42:40 | artom | Questions are good :) | |
| 14:44:35 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: Allow Manila shares to be directly attached to instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/833669 | |
| 14:45:01 | Uggla | gibi, btw I have just done a slight update. | |
| 14:58:00 | gibi | ack | |
| 15:14:28 | bauzas | reminder : nova meeting in 45 mins here at #openstack-nova | |
| 16:00:12 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 3 16:00:12 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:13 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:13 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:01:04 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:09 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:11 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:01:22 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:01:26 | bauzas | hello | |
| 16:01:27 | melwitt | o/ | |
| 16:01:39 | bauzas | sorry I'm over the phone but let's start | |
| 16:01:48 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:01:52 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:01:57 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 22 new untriaged bugs (-2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:03 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:02:08 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:02:19 | bauzas | artom: around ? | |
| 16:02:28 | artom | 'sup? | |
| 16:03:07 | bauzas | artom: can I pass you the next bug triage baton ? | |
| 16:03:08 | artom | I'm getting baton'ed, aren't I? | |
| 16:03:08 | melwitt | I thought we had 28 new bugs last meeting :( https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-04-26-16.00.log.html#l-16 | |
| 16:03:25 | melwitt | -2 makes it look like I didn't do anything 😂 | |
| 16:03:47 | gibi | melwitt: thank you for the triage! | |
| 16:04:02 | gibi | I also remember 28 or 29 from last week | |
| 16:04:33 | melwitt | I copied gibi's doc https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220426, there were a couple more where I added comments but didn't change from New bc not enough info yet afaict | |
| 16:05:00 | melwitt | (and didn't add to doc either) | |
| 16:05:07 | bauzas | yeah, thanks melwitt ! | |
| 16:05:10 | artom | Should we maybe have a single etherpad? | |
| 16:05:20 | artom | So new batoners can refers to existing work/patterns/templates? | |
| 16:05:26 | bauzas | melwitt: no worries, I had some weeks the same situation | |
| 16:05:35 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:05:48 | bauzas | I was triaged like 10 bugs but given 12 were new, I was only having a -2 value :) | |
| 16:05:58 | bauzas | or the other way, sorry :) | |
| 16:06:06 | melwitt | I think one etherpad would quickly become a megapad. but the pads are linked here so far https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:06:24 | artom | melwitt, aha OK that works, as long as we have a single... something | |
| 16:06:25 | bauzas | yeah, we can have a new etherpad per week, it's fine | |
| 16:06:25 | gibi | artom: I created the etherpad just to note for the meeting if there are valid but unassigned bugs | |
| 16:06:44 | bauzas | it's not actually really needed to create a etherpad | |
| 16:06:54 | gibi | not at all mandatory :) | |
| 16:06:55 | bauzas | like gibi said, he did it for him | |
| 16:07:29 | melwitt | yeah. and I liked it so I copied it | |
| 16:08:02 | gibi | (it is also good for looking back after the week and justify the time spent on launchpad :) | |
| 16:08:36 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Record SRIOV PF MAC in the binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829248 | |
| 16:09:32 | melwitt | gibi: +1 :) | |
| 16:11:10 | gibi | bauzas: I think we can move on | |
| 16:11:18 | bauzas | ok, next topic | |
| 16:12:02 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:12:07 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:12:36 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:12:41 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:12:45 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:12:50 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:13:13 | gibi | melwitt: thanks for the triage on the gate bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1970642 I will try to get back to that | |
| 16:13:14 | bauzas | nothing to tell from me | |
| 16:13:30 | melwitt | this gate bug has shown back up on stable/ussuri fyi https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1901739 but it doesn't show up in the gate-failure tag bc it's on ussuri only | |
| 16:13:34 | melwitt | gibi: np! | |
| 16:14:28 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:14:41 | melwitt | we're on our second recheck trying to merge one of the gate unblocking patch on stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838033 :\ | |
| 16:15:04 | melwitt | for bug 1901739 | |
| 16:15:33 | gibi | and the original fix was to switch to zuul v3 :/ | |
| 16:15:42 | elodilles | yepp, it seems ussuri is not that healthy as it should be :S | |
| 16:16:03 | elodilles | gibi: and as far as i remember we did not need that for ussuri | |
| 16:16:13 | elodilles | so this is something "new" | |
| 16:17:30 | gibi | hm we do merged the ussuri backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795432 | |
| 16:18:08 | gibi | that should have fixed 1901739 but appreantly it did not | |
| 16:19:22 | elodilles | oh. hmmm, yes, we did not backport it to *train*... | |
| 16:19:37 | elodilles | then this is definitely something "new" | |
| 16:19:37 | gibi | that is all I can add to this right now :/ | |
| 16:21:15 | bauzas | could we discuss about the stable branch gate issues during the stable topic, maybe ? | |
| 16:21:32 | elodilles | ++ :) | |