Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-04-26
03:28:53 fzzf[m] * hi folks. I use nodepool connect openstack provider. in openstack, nova build instance failed. and nova list show instance is in BUILD state. and I can't delete it.... (full message at https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/nhRIVjZthAjNvxgkNkdUczzV)
07:18:08 Uggla Good morning. o/
07:37:56 bauzas Uggla: good morning
08:31:04 gibi o/
08:56:04 sean-k-mooney gmann: dansmith care to readd your +w for moving the fips job to c9s https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831844/7
09:30:24 fzzf[m] hi folks. I use nodepool connect openstack provider. nova build instance failed. and nova list show instance is in BUILD state like follow. I delete it prompt No server with a name or ID. and in dashboard show have use these two instance, 8 vcpu, 16g memory, openstack is packstack train ,nova is 15.1.1... (full message at https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/cXVvKGZbhOphiZZcinYshnCe)
10:30:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Reproduce bug 1953359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839353
10:30:32 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Extend the reproducer for 1953359 and 1952915 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839354
10:30:33 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: [rt] Apply migration context for incoming migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839355
11:03:07 gibi bauzas: I'm not when you clean up the nova meeting agenda but I now added a topic for Open Discussion for this week's meeting
11:03:14 gibi * I'm not sure
11:10:46 sean-k-mooney artom: by the way while you are fixing revert if you feel like updating https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/750217/2 i would not object. i should really get back to that but have not had the time
11:22:41 opendevreview Andrew Bonney proposed openstack/nova master: Fix segment-aware scheduling permissions error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839361
11:57:36 sean-k-mooney woot! just tested cold migration with vdpa on real hardware with my WIP patch and it indeed worked as the func tests said it should
11:58:15 sean-k-mooney i need to test every thing else and then reivew the logs but this is a good sign
12:01:23 sean-k-mooney shelve and resize work too
12:09:39 sean-k-mooney evacuate works too and the device is correctly released if/when the source host is started after the evac
12:10:11 sean-k-mooney so that is all the move ops that should work exluding live-migration which qemu does not support
12:12:36 sean-k-mooney ok suspend is broken but that fine that is going to be split into another patch anyway and i am pretty sure i know why that is broken anyway. im using the generic pci device detach function and i shoudl be using the interface detach version since vdpa devices ues the interface not host dev elements like normal sriov vfs
12:14:14 gibi sean-k-mooney: nice!
12:16:14 sean-k-mooney im really happy i was able to more or less prove this out with the functional tests ahead of time
12:16:34 sean-k-mooney i kindof expected suspend to fail too which is why i wanted to test this on real hardware
12:25:11 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I guess you manage to install ceph on top of Centos Stream. Any hints to fix that: nothing provides "libpython3.6m.so.1.0()(64bit) needed by ceph-mgr-2:16.2.7-0.el8.x86_64"
12:32:30 sean-k-mooney Uggla: how are you isntalling ceph? with the devstack plugin or by hand?
12:33:31 sean-k-mooney by the way that looks like you are just missin python3-devel
12:34:02 sean-k-mooney also are you using centos stream 8
12:34:07 sean-k-mooney that is not supported anymore
12:34:15 Uggla sean-k-mooney, devstack plugin (from manila local.conf example : https://docs.openstack.org/manila/latest/_downloads/e31f39ce83daac60c4348fde522cee1e/cephfs_local.conf)
12:34:18 sean-k-mooney you should be using centos stream 9
12:34:35 sean-k-mooney openstack nolonger support python 3.6
12:34:35 Uggla sean-k-mooney, it is a stream9
12:34:54 sean-k-mooney libpython3.6 is python 3.6
12:35:01 sean-k-mooney centos stream 9 uses 3.9
12:35:21 Uggla for anyreason it seems the plugin is trying to install a pkg from centos 8
12:37:25 Uggla Problem: package ceph-2:16.2.7-0.el8.x86_64 requires ceph-mgr = 2:16.2.7-0.el8 but it is clearly a stream 9. I'm gonna have a look where the ceph package comes from.
12:38:18 sean-k-mooney i dont think they have added centos stream 9 support to the devstack plugin yet
12:38:25 sean-k-mooney just looking at the code
12:38:43 sean-k-mooney i was using ubutnu 20.04 for my ceph testing
12:39:27 sean-k-mooney you can set CEPH_CONTAINERIZED=True in your local.conf
12:39:31 sean-k-mooney that might fix the issue for you
12:39:51 Uggla sean-k-mooney, it install this repo : https://download.ceph.com/rpm-pacific/el8/$basearch
12:40:08 sean-k-mooney yes
12:40:19 sean-k-mooney https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/src/branch/master/devstack/lib/ceph#L31
12:40:27 sean-k-mooney that is contolled by that ^
12:41:48 sean-k-mooney Uggla: you should have hit this check https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/src/branch/master/devstack/lib/ceph#L271-L28
12:41:55 sean-k-mooney you ar enot running a supported os
12:43:00 Uggla sean-k-mooney, yep I had to add FORCE_CEPH_INSTALL=yes
12:43:16 sean-k-mooney ya that is why this is failing
12:43:23 sean-k-mooney so the repo config is contoled by https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/src/branch/master/devstack/lib/ceph#L913-L943
12:43:47 bauzas gibi: ack, thanks
12:44:14 sean-k-mooney Uggla: that is currently hardcoded to el8
12:44:17 sean-k-mooney https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/src/branch/master/devstack/lib/ceph#L1144
12:44:18 Uggla sean-k-mooney, yep but in the repo there is no el9.
12:45:50 sean-k-mooney ya i see that
12:46:26 Uggla sean-k-mooney, CEPH_CONTAINERIZED=True, will install ceph in a container ?
12:46:32 sean-k-mooney yep
12:46:44 sean-k-mooney https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/src/branch/master/devstack/lib/ceph#L157-L174
12:47:02 Uggla sean-k-mooney, do you think it will work ?
12:47:05 sean-k-mooney so it will install ceph in a container and dinstall just the ceph client on the host form ceph_common
12:47:28 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I'm going to try...
12:47:34 sean-k-mooney i think it will be the only way to install ceph currently on centos 9 stream
12:48:17 sean-k-mooney Uggla: they are currently in the process or rewriting this plugin to use cephadm by the way
12:48:26 sean-k-mooney that might add centos 9 support as a result
12:49:00 Uggla sean-k-mooney, centos stream9 is currently a bit too more bleeding edge. :)
12:49:23 sean-k-mooney that is generally not a good thing
12:49:47 sean-k-mooney am so the way to work around this for centos 9 stream would be to use ceph form disto packages instead fo from upstream ceph
12:49:57 sean-k-mooney https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/storage/x86_64/ceph-quincy/
12:50:40 Uggla sean-k-mooney, require docker of course any preference in between docker or podman ?
12:51:59 sean-k-mooney it will install it
12:52:10 sean-k-mooney it will use docker
12:52:42 sean-k-mooney the simplest thing to do might be to implemtn centos 9 stream support int he plugin
12:53:43 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I don't really like your "simplest" solution. :D
12:55:27 sean-k-mooney Uggla: well we all maintian devstack together :) but ill talk to the devstack/qa folk and see if i can find time to add centos 9 support
12:55:41 sean-k-mooney Uggla: must people dont use centos by the way
12:56:00 sean-k-mooney so if a feature does not work on centos it generally falls to use to add it if we want to use it
12:57:20 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I was kidding. That could be an interesting thing to do and learn. But not the simplest I think.
12:57:35 Uggla sean-k-mooney, at least for me.
12:59:57 sean-k-mooney try usign it form contianer for now
13:00:21 sean-k-mooney manilla does not strictly need ceph and you do not need ceph for your manilla share work
13:00:44 sean-k-mooney so you can go back to just using cinder lvm for now until you ahve the basic supprot working
13:00:49 sean-k-mooney and look at using ceph later
13:01:15 sean-k-mooney i.e. deploy manila with cinder lvm and use nfs shares initally
13:02:46 sean-k-mooney then when we figure out how to deploy ceph on centos 9 and add supprot to devstack we can then extend the nova supprot to work with cephfs although that really should not need much code change in nova just mounting the share
13:03:22 Uggla sean-k-mooney, yes and no. So for I focus on NFS. There are still things to fix but it seems I manage to mount the share into the VM using virtiofs + NFS.
13:03:53 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I wanted to do the same for CEPHFS.
13:04:33 sean-k-mooney ack
13:05:37 Uggla sean-k-mooney, and yes from nova perspective, that sounds like not a major change.
13:06:02 Uggla sean-k-mooney, however I'm not blocked.
13:11:23 fzzf[m] > <@fzzfh:matrix.org> hi folks. I use nodepool connect openstack provider. nova build instance failed. and nova list show instance is in BUILD state like follow. I delete it prompt No server with a name or ID. and in dashboard show have use these two instance, 8 vcpu, 16g memory, openstack is packstack train ,nova is 15.1.1... (full message at https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/oDINtdoeiJnrakEWVAWwmwho)
13:39:58 Uggla 44bf4c5e-b6ae-463d-9ed2-3d0177c1ee80 on /nene type virtiofs (rw,relatime) \o/ (I still have to fix stuff, but that's a milestone for me)
13:41:45 artom *snerk* /nene
14:05:13 bauzas gibi: good idea of creating an etherpad for https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220419
14:05:23 bauzas gibi: do you want to discuss about this on the meeting ?
14:44:40 gibi bauzas: I planned to link that to on the meeting for reference
14:44:50 bauzas ok
14:45:05 gibi bauzas: and I will ask if we want to make it a mail or keep it an etherpad
14:45:29 bauzas mho is that etherpad is just enough
14:47:04 gibi yeah I'm OK with this being a pads
15:16:58 bauzas gentle reminder : nova meeting in 45 mins by now here at #openstack-nova
15:30:41 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (db) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831193

Earlier   Later