| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-04-19 | |||
| 16:06:02 | bauzas | next topic then | |
| 16:06:07 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:06:12 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:06:16 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:06:21 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:06:26 | bauzas | chateaulav: ^ ;) | |
| 16:06:31 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:06:35 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:06:50 | dansmith | ++ | |
| 16:07:29 | gmann | ++ | |
| 16:07:39 | bauzas | nothing to tell about the gate CI ? | |
| 16:07:57 | bauzas | chateaulav: looks like the periodic jobs work :) | |
| 16:08:12 | chateaulav | sure do | |
| 16:09:02 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:09:14 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:22 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:26 | bauzas | #info Zed-1 is due in 4 weeks | |
| 16:09:42 | bauzas | I'll ask next week for a spec review day | |
| 16:09:51 | bauzas | start to think about it | |
| 16:10:02 | bauzas | maybe sometimes around Zed-1 | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | nothing to tell apart of this | |
| 16:11:46 | bauzas | ok, moving on | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:11:57 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:12:17 | bauzas | I'll continue to review stephenfin's changes for SQLA | |
| 16:12:20 | bauzas | 2.0 | |
| 16:13:02 | gibi | it is on my list too | |
| 16:13:42 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:13:47 | bauzas | moving on again | |
| 16:13:54 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:13:57 | bauzas | elodilles: ^ | |
| 16:14:06 | elodilles | #info xena branch is blocked until 'l-c drop' patches merge - https://review.opendev.org/q/I514f6b337ffefef90a0ce9ab0b4afd083caa277e | |
| 16:14:17 | elodilles | #info victoria and older branches are blocked by devstack issue - this needs to be backported for older branches (?): https://review.opendev.org/q/I941ef5ea90970a0901236afe81c551aaf24ac1d8 | |
| 16:14:23 | elodilles | #info stable/victoria Extended Maintenance transition is due ~ in a week (2022-04-27) - we don't have much time to land patches and release them (especially with broken gate) | |
| 16:14:27 | elodilles | EOM | |
| 16:14:41 | dansmith | elodilles: I'll be glad to +2 those :) | |
| 16:14:56 | elodilles | dansmith: roger :) | |
| 16:14:56 | gmann | elodilles: victoria should be good now | |
| 16:15:01 | opendevreview | Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: stable/xena: Fix lower-constraint job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838509 | |
| 16:15:02 | opendevreview | Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Fix pre_live_migration rollback https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836015 | |
| 16:15:03 | opendevreview | Erlon R. Cruz proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Adds regression test for bug LP#1944619 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838550 | |
| 16:15:18 | elodilles | gmann: isn't that depend on ussuri? | |
| 16:15:24 | gmann | stable/ussuri or less are broken, I will backport the fix in stable/ussuri as I need to pin tempest there. | |
| 16:16:04 | elodilles | gmann: i mean, for stable/victoria gate to work in nova we should have devstack's stable/ussuri fixed | |
| 16:16:04 | gmann | but table/train or less, someone need to backport if we want to fix or just time to EOL? | |
| 16:16:07 | dansmith | is melwitt around? | |
| 16:16:26 | dansmith | I'm thinking that since these are just job removals we could just +W them all and let them land, potentially out of order without a problem | |
| 16:16:27 | gmann | elodilles: oh do we run nova grenade job in nova stable/victoria? | |
| 16:16:34 | dansmith | it's not a regression like might normally be the case | |
| 16:16:35 | gmann | dansmith: +1 | |
| 16:16:36 | dansmith | elodilles: thoughts? | |
| 16:17:37 | elodilles | dansmith: sounds good | |
| 16:17:51 | elodilles | for the 'l-c drop' patches | |
| 16:17:53 | dansmith | okay, melwitt said she was waiting to +2, but I think we should just slam them in | |
| 16:18:25 | dansmith | you okay if I treat her +1 as a +2 and just +2+W straight away? | |
| 16:18:43 | bauzas | if I can help, lmk | |
| 16:18:47 | elodilles | gmann: i think in nova (and neutron) grenade is running back till queens | |
| 16:18:52 | gmann | elodilles: for git issue, you are right stable/victoria in nova is blocked as we have nova grenade job running https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/victoria/.zuul.yaml#L466 | |
| 16:19:13 | gmann | elodilles: let me backport in ussuri today but no motivation for stable/train or less | |
| 16:19:44 | elodilles | gmann: understood, i can backport them further | |
| 16:19:55 | gmann | elodilles: :) no option for EOL? | |
| 16:20:14 | elodilles | gmann: well, the option is there :) | |
| 16:20:29 | elodilles | gmann: what i see is that no one is interested in pike | |
| 16:20:36 | gmann | ack | |
| 16:20:40 | gmann | your call. | |
| 16:20:46 | elodilles | gmann: so i'm anyway planning to propose pike EOL | |
| 16:20:58 | gmann | sounds good, | |
| 16:20:58 | elodilles | gmann: though i see patches for queens time to time | |
| 16:21:24 | elodilles | gmann: but if no one else is interested, then of course, let's EOL | |
| 16:21:45 | gmann | yeah, we have to do it at some point otherwise we end up spending time on those | |
| 16:21:53 | bauzas | well, I'm not interested at least :) | |
| 16:22:05 | bauzas | elodilles: but you can ask the community | |
| 16:22:24 | gmann | anyways may be we can discuss that in TC or release about how many we can EOL | |
| 16:22:28 | elodilles | bauzas: i'm planning to do that for pike (mass-EOL) | |
| 16:22:32 | gmann | yeah, +1 on ML asking | |
| 16:23:09 | elodilles | sure, will do | |
| 16:25:54 | bauzas | ok, I guess we can move | |
| 16:26:02 | bauzas | last item | |
| 16:26:05 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:26:09 | bauzas | (artom) https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-update-windows-englightenments | |
| 16:26:37 | bauzas | artom_: not sure you can hear us :) | |
| 16:26:45 | bauzas | but this is your time | |
| 16:26:49 | artom_ | Yeah, I grew a tail since then | |
| 16:26:55 | opendevreview | David Hill proposed openstack/nova master: Add disable_cpu_type_validation to skip cpu type validation. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838552 | |
| 16:27:11 | artom_ | So, yeah, we talked about it at PTG, I filed the BP, just looking for a yay/nay on the specless BP aspect | |
| 16:27:15 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unavailable but not reported PCI devices at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838553 | |
| 16:27:15 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Simulate bug 1969496 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838554 | |
| 16:27:16 | bauzas | ok, this is a specless BP approval | |
| 16:27:30 | artom_ | We're basically updating the XML we pass to libvirt when the guest is Windows to be nicer to the guest | |
| 16:27:41 | artom_ | And mimic the kind of virtual HW that hyperv gives it | |
| 16:27:54 | dansmith | only for windows guests or all? | |
| 16:27:55 | bauzas | looks enough trivial for me and uncontroversial as libvirt supports those enlightments with our bare minimum version | |
| 16:28:10 | bauzas | and we already add some of them | |
| 16:28:21 | bauzas | dansmith: only for windows guests, yay | |
| 16:28:43 | bauzas | dansmith: we have some conditional in the code that makes the windows guests half-smart | |
| 16:28:58 | bauzas | half-smart, because we only enable some and not all the enlightments | |
| 16:28:58 | dansmith | there was previously a strong desire from some ops to be able to avoid exposing more detail to guests for cases where software had arbitrary "not licensed for virtual environments" restrictions | |
| 16:29:08 | dansmith | okay | |
| 16:29:34 | bauzas | dansmith: the conditional is based on the image prop IIRC | |
| 16:29:55 | dansmith | some image prop indicating windows or that windows enlightenments should be added? | |