Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-03-11
17:23:27 sean-k-mooney zigo: this was partly propeted by unmaintained packages that were breakign the gate
17:24:17 zigo sean-k-mooney: Is zVMCloudConnector completely gone?
17:24:28 zigo Or will it stay ...
17:25:03 zigo In other words: should I ask for its removal from Debian and erase all traces of it?
17:25:10 gmann dansmith: kashyap sean-k-mooney for detach failure/SSHable things, this last one needs to be merged, rescue negative test which this patch making SSHable was failing in reported bug. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/831608
17:25:26 gmann it is not ready, need to debug on change failure though
17:29:34 dansmith gmann: ah are you saying that the sshable patches that already merged are working and that there are just a few remaining ones needing to be converted (in that patch)?
17:30:05 sean-k-mooney zigo: we still have it in tree https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/master/nova/virt/zvm im not sure what its state is
17:30:48 gmann dansmith: patches merged are few volume detach are made SSH-able but the failing test in centos9-stream was rescue negative which is in-progress in 831608
17:31:46 gmann dansmith: those merged were not failing, may be due to the wait between server create and detach operation call. in rescue negative timing were playing key role
17:32:38 dansmith gmann: okay the latest failure I'm looking at includes test_rescued_vm_detach_volume but there's another in there, which may or may not be related
17:32:46 dansmith but yeah good to know
17:34:16 sean-k-mooney dansmith: how oftten are you seeing the failure by the way
17:34:24 sean-k-mooney is it blockign the gate consitently
17:34:25 gmann dansmith: yeah that test and in negative test just try the detach and assert expected failure as detach cannot be done on rescue server but later this test does un-rescue server and detach in cleanup there it stuck
17:34:40 dansmith sean-k-mooney: on centos, this was one very common one we were suffering in the glance job
17:34:42 gmann * in that negative test
17:35:04 sean-k-mooney does glance need to test this?
17:35:04 dansmith gmann: do those tests actually ssh for some reason, or are we just using ssh to determine readiness?
17:35:34 gmann dansmith: just to check readiness
17:35:36 dansmith sean-k-mooney: yeah, this was a glance-cinder-multistore job which needs to run volume-related tests of course
17:35:46 sean-k-mooney some volume operation are certenly glance related but detach proably isnt
17:36:01 dansmith gmann: we could use the login prompt via console instead to reduce the need for secgroups, if that's hard for some reason
17:36:25 dansmith sean-k-mooney: it's a job that tests cinder-glance multistore arrangements
17:36:28 gmann dansmith: that is one try if that fix it. but there might be some other issue. we will see if that patch (once pass gate) can pass cento9 job too
17:36:46 sean-k-mooney dansmith: we removed usign the console in an eairler patch
17:36:49 dansmith sean-k-mooney: but the only reason we were running on centos was because we were trying to get a fips job and used one of our existing wide-coverage jobs to do that
17:37:01 dansmith gmann: ack
17:37:11 gmann yeah SSH-able was preferred than console check
17:37:25 dansmith it's definitely good, it's just more than required for this but fair enough
17:37:58 gmann let me debug sec group thing today or monday. I compared and it was same as other test doing but i might have missing something
17:38:17 sean-k-mooney i think the console check failed in a specific edgecase but i dont recall what it was exactly.
17:38:32 dansmith it's just out-of-band, so a little less fragile,
17:38:46 dansmith but it's cool if we're trying to stick to sshable as the indicator
18:10:03 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Add whitebox-devstack-multinode job to periodic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833453
21:46:48 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Attempt to thin out nova-ceph-multistore https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833470
#openstack-nova - 2022-03-12
00:20:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Changes Emulation CI to weekly-periodic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833163
#openstack-nova - 2022-03-14
09:57:07 bauzas happy Hugarian Holidays elodilles and gibi
11:00:13 opendevreview Andre Aranha proposed openstack/nova master: Move FIPS jobs to experimental and periodic queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833431
11:23:09 elodilles bauzas: thx :D
11:48:29 opendevreview Andre Aranha proposed openstack/nova master: Move FIPS jobs to experimental and periodic queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833431
11:48:30 opendevreview Andre Aranha proposed openstack/nova master: Test setting the nova job to centos-9-stream https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831844
11:54:19 opendevreview Andre Aranha proposed openstack/nova master: Move FIPS jobs to experimental and periodic queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833431
11:56:17 opendevreview Andre Aranha proposed openstack/nova master: Test setting the nova job to centos-9-stream https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831844
13:33:20 Uggla lyarwood, I have a question regarding the manila, virtiofs specs. (https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/yoga/approved/libvirt-virtiofs-attach-manila-shares.html) Any reason not to store the share_proto (nfs, cephfs...) on the object ?
13:43:09 tobias-urdin elodilles: please see stable backport request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828407 thanks!
13:45:53 lyarwood Uggla: is that not encoded in the export_locaiton we get from Manila? If it's not then I don't think caching it in Nova would be an issue tbh.
13:50:43 Uggla lyarwood, no this is not in the export location. Only the ip + path are available. So I think I will add the proto.
13:55:11 lyarwood https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/shared-file-system/?expanded=show-single-export-location-detail,show-all-share-metadata-detail,show-share-details-detail#id27 - Yeah odd I thought it was in the export_location for some reason, it's there in the share details at least so it's not that hard to grab a copy
14:05:10 dansmith bauzas: are you okay with this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833470
14:05:31 dansmith that job has been OOMing a lot lately, taking out mysqld when it does
14:05:49 dansmith reducing the scope to exclude swift should lower the pressure a bit I think, without compromising what the job is intending to test
14:06:40 dansmith gmann: ^
15:15:05 bauzas dansmith: sorry, was with Uggla and also had to help my kid
15:15:36 bauzas dansmith: oh, I see
15:16:03 bauzas dansmith: oh yes, not sure why we should use Swift
15:17:23 dansmith thanks
17:06:53 artom bauzas, as requested, the backport link: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828414
17:07:07 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: [stable-only] Fix sphinx doc job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833666
17:12:42 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: Allow Manila shares to be directly attached to instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/833669
17:39:11 gmann dansmith: lgtm but can you add note there so that nobody will accidently enable them it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833470/1/.zuul.yaml#588
17:39:28 dansmith gmann: sure
17:39:44 gmann thanks
17:40:44 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Attempt to thin out nova-ceph-multistore https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833470
17:40:48 dansmith gmann: ^
17:41:40 gmann dansmith: +2. bauzas ^^
17:47:26 bauzas gmann: dansmith: sent to the gate
17:48:59 dansmith bauzas: everyone thanks you, including me :P
17:49:06 bauzas :)
20:06:56 admin1 i have cinder and glance in ceph, but nova is local storage .. when i take snapshot .. it says saving .. and then quickly disappears .. is snapshot a glance or a nova thing and where would the logs for those be ?
20:09:20 dansmith admin1: nova does the snapshot, and uploads it to glance when it's done
20:09:31 dansmith nova-compute, specifically
20:14:08 admin1 dansmith .. thanks .. i will check
#openstack-nova - 2022-03-15
00:33:57 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Attempt to thin out nova-ceph-multistore https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833470
10:04:34 opendevreview Maxim Korezkij proposed openstack/nova master: Handle volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833234
10:35:56 opendevreview Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825178
13:11:30 opendevreview kiran pawar proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: StableMoRefProxy for moref recovery https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832164
13:16:05 opendevreview kiran pawar proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: Split out VMwareAPISession https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832156
13:16:05 opendevreview kiran pawar proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: StableMoRefProxy for moref recovery https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832164
15:08:33 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-traits master: Update CI to use unversioned jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/833826
15:15:49 bauzas nova meeting in 45 mins
15:15:56 bauzas not sure we'll have quorum tho
15:16:05 bauzas but I'll open the meeting
15:43:15 opendevreview Maxim Korezkij proposed openstack/nova master: Handle volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833234
15:52:50 bauzas nova meeting in 8 mins
15:53:02 bauzas US and Canadian folks who are already in DST ^
16:00:05 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:05 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Mar 15 16:00:04 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:05 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:05 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:14 bauzas hey folks
16:00:22 bauzas as I said, not sure we have quorum
16:00:37 bauzas if no folks are here, I could cancel this meeting
16:01:01 bauzas nothing really important to discuss for this week
16:01:42 bauzas let's wait for 2 mins
16:01:53 artom ~o~
16:01:53 bauzas and then, I could cancel
16:03:05 artom Yeah if no one else is around we can punt
16:03:10 Uggla o/
16:03:36 bauzas I can just provide some values and then that's it

Earlier   Later