| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-08 | |||
| 17:33:19 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: i mean perhaps prelude and upgrades section maybe | |
| 17:33:40 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we will figure it out | |
| 17:33:47 | gmann | will there be any upgrade section in tock? i mean we want to avoid those like depreaction right | |
| 17:33:59 | dansmith | gmann: sometimes features bring upgrade items I think | |
| 17:34:00 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: there should be | |
| 17:34:17 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: i really dont thinik we shoudl try to avoid either in a tock | |
| 17:34:22 | gmann | ah new feature. got it | |
| 17:34:32 | sean-k-mooney | if we do it will slow down devleopment | |
| 17:34:54 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: addin a db migraition for a new feature woudl be an upgrade impact i coudl see in a tock | |
| 17:35:05 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: remember this is a compromise, some things will have to change.. hopefully less with this than the alternative | |
| 17:35:09 | gmann | making release notes page too verbose and long make them hard to read good things. I think link to tock releease notes in tick releasenotes should be fine | |
| 17:35:21 | dansmith | gmann: agree | |
| 17:35:55 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: right but if we cant do db changes in a tock or rpc change for example then tha tis not a compromise | |
| 17:36:20 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: as noted, I think it's totally fine to *add* things to db and rpc in tock | |
| 17:38:48 | bauzas | yup | |
| 17:39:00 | bauzas | we can rpc bump things in a tock | |
| 17:39:12 | bauzas | if we have rpc compat of courser | |
| 17:39:25 | bauzas | we can add a db upgrade script too | |
| 17:40:06 | bauzas | we can even remove a rpc compat on a tock release if compat was there on the previous tick | |
| 17:40:22 | bauzas | rpc aliases will continue to exist | |
| 17:40:31 | bauzas | and microversions too | |
| 17:41:18 | bauzas | but somehow we need to settle a couple of rules we gonna write on our contrib docs | |
| 17:41:54 | bauzas | that's why I want us to agree on the impacts for nova so we can write it down | |
| 17:42:27 | gmann | bauzas: +1. | |
| 17:43:07 | gmann | bauzas: sean-k-mooney added it on TC+PTL slots, L27 - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-ptl-interaction-zed | |
| 17:45:07 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: thanks | |
| 17:45:44 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: yes we have time to figure that out before AA | |
| 17:53:24 | sean-k-mooney | ok im hungery so im going to grab something to eat i might be on irc later but i will likely just work on some reviews for the evning | |
| 17:53:48 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add the Yoga prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832292 | |
| 17:54:07 | bauzas | gmann: dansmith: melwitt: sean-k-mooney: gibi: new revision for the Yoga prelude ^ | |
| 17:55:46 | gibi | bauzas: +2 from me | |
| 17:55:53 | gibi | thanks for writing it up | |
| 17:55:53 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 17:58:13 | dansmith | bauzas: looks good content-wise to me, but a bunch of nit corrections | |
| 18:08:12 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/831651 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-09 | |||
| 06:55:39 | ygk_12345 | hi all | |
| 06:55:51 | ygk_12345 | can we change a flavor from public to private ? | |
| 07:08:00 | ygk_12345 | can we convert a private flavor to public ? | |
| 07:08:01 | gibi | ygk_12345: I think you cannot change it to public, but you can add tenants to the access list to see the private flavor | |
| 07:08:34 | ygk_12345 | gibi: ok | |
| 08:26:40 | bauzas | fortunately, my coffee machine has water in its tank :) | |
| 08:34:54 | dmitriis | gibi: o/ if you have time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829974 | |
| 08:38:49 | rribaud__ | bauzas, hello, I hope it will be fixed soon. | |
| 08:39:10 | bauzas | rribaud__: hopefully :crossed_fingers! | |
| 08:40:35 | kashyap | bauzas: Bonjour. I have a soft -1 with a suggestion on the Yoga prelude. :) | |
| 08:40:46 | bauzas | kashyap: /me looks | |
| 08:40:46 | rribaud__ | bauzas, usually water maintenance people are reactive, that should not be long. | |
| 08:41:17 | bauzas | rribaud__: actually, this is fixed by the last hour but the pressure is bad | |
| 08:42:37 | kashyap | bauzas: No rush, just a phrasing part | |
| 08:43:56 | bauzas | revising it | |
| 08:46:36 | bauzas | kashyap: thanks for your comments, good explanation why we don't want it for production use | |
| 08:46:56 | kashyap | No prob | |
| 08:47:04 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add the Yoga prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/832292 | |
| 08:47:05 | bauzas | there it goes... | |
| 08:47:22 | bauzas | dansmith: gibi: amended the prelude based on dan's comment | |
| 08:49:52 | bauzas | elodilles: today and tomorrow will be busy days for merging things | |
| 08:50:13 | bauzas | elodilles: I guess we will only be able to amend the nova rc1 yaml by the end of our day | |
| 08:50:32 | bauzas | (tomorrow I mean) | |
| 08:53:33 | bauzas | hah, all water issues fixed, let me visit my shower :) | |
| 09:26:54 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/os-traits master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs(traits) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/832769 | |
| 09:38:37 | elodilles | bauzas: ack, if the patch is -1'd then the release managers won't force-approve the patch without pinging you ;) | |
| 09:38:53 | bauzas | yah I know | |
| 09:39:08 | bauzas | elodilles: but I wanted to explain we need to merge a few changes before removing the -1 | |
| 09:39:18 | bauzas | so it would be a bit late tomorrow | |
| 09:39:25 | elodilles | bauzas: cool, roger :) | |
| 09:39:34 | bauzas | (as we need to wait for the merge) | |
| 09:39:38 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add 'COMPUTE_STORAGE_VIRTIO_FS', 'COMPUTE_MEM_BACKING_FILE' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/832769 | |
| 09:39:51 | elodilles | i'll be around, so no problem :) | |
| 09:40:25 | elodilles | and thanks for the heads-up | |
| 09:41:07 | bauzas | elodilles: haha, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC7pZSd8iRg | |
| 09:56:24 | elodilles | yepp, that's classic ;) | |
| 10:22:16 | rribaud__ | hello, question, I have modified os-trait locally. What is the best way to use it with tox (nova) ? | |
| 10:33:16 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830918 | |
| 11:27:11 | ygk_12345 | Folks, in which database is the nova flavor details stored ? | |
| 11:27:34 | ygk_12345 | for all the created flavors I mean | |
| 11:36:54 | ygk_12345 | any idea ? | |
| 11:40:56 | rribaud__ | ygk_12345, I think it is in nova_api --> flavors table | |
| 11:51:15 | ygk_12345 | rribaud__: thanks for the info | |
| 12:35:00 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add 'COMPUTE_STORAGE_VIRTIO_FS', 'COMPUTE_MEM_BACKING_FILE' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/832769 | |
| 12:55:33 | sean-k-mooney1 | rribaud__: you just do .tox/py3/bin/pip install ../os-traits | |
| 12:56:04 | sean-k-mooney1 | so after you have created the tox env if you need a local os-traits just install it and run tox again | |
| 12:56:26 | sean-k-mooney1 | or run the command tox would run manuatlly | |
| 12:56:43 | sean-k-mooney1 | .tox/py3/bin/stestr ... | |
| 13:45:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#1944619 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821840 | |
| 13:53:21 | rribaud__ | sean-k-mooney1, thx. | |
| 13:53:56 | rribaud__ | sean-k-mooney1++ | |
| 14:08:33 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830010 | |
| 14:17:11 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828570 | |
| 14:20:59 | erlon | bauzas: hey, in the pre_live_migration fix, what you mean with 'Can you please provide a FUP for this', to implement seans' suggestion? | |
| 14:27:13 | bauzas | erlon: sorry, FUP means "a follow-up patch" | |
| 14:27:37 | bauzas | erlon: that means I can +W this patch if you agree with providing a separate patch for modifying the reno file | |
| 14:27:49 | erlon | bauzas: oh, ok, sure, Ill do and address the other comments too | |
| 14:27:58 | bauzas | erlon: thanks | |
| 14:28:08 | bauzas | erlon: we can merge this FUP before tomorrow | |
| 14:28:15 | bauzas | (before RC1) | |
| 14:28:27 | erlon | right, that was my only concern | |
| 15:23:34 | bauzas | erlon: I don't yet see your FUP ? | |
| 15:24:45 | erlon | bauzas: was in a meeting | |
| 15:27:18 | bauzas | erlon: ok, just ping me when you send it | |
| 15:27:28 | bauzas | and then I'll +W the original patch | |