| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-03-08 | |||
| 16:02:14 | bauzas | haven't seen any issue fwiw | |
| 16:02:24 | kashyap | By "call" I mean, call for helping triage. | |
| 16:02:45 | bauzas | kashyap: I see that gibi would be discussed about this during the PTG | |
| 16:02:50 | bauzas | discussing* | |
| 16:02:57 | gibi | yeah I added to topic | |
| 16:02:57 | kashyap | Nod, but that can go on parallely | |
| 16:03:39 | bauzas | for the moment, let's continue to do the same, but indeed we should think about it for the PTG | |
| 16:04:18 | bauzas | the problem is that I'm not sure that contributors are supported by their managers for upstream bug triage if they do it :) | |
| 16:04:53 | gibi | for me it is a bit about allocating a specific timeslot when I focus on bugs | |
| 16:04:56 | bauzas | anyway, let's not discuss this by now | |
| 16:05:02 | gibi | ack | |
| 16:05:18 | bauzas | any bug people want to discuss ? | |
| 16:05:21 | bauzas | I have one | |
| 16:05:32 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1962726 | |
| 16:06:15 | kashyap | Ouch | |
| 16:06:23 | gibi | that seems like a very valid bug | |
| 16:06:38 | kashyap | Yeah, definitely | |
| 16:06:40 | bauzas | yeah, but it should not be a bug | |
| 16:06:56 | kashyap | Don't say an "RFE"; it's definitely a bug in my eyes :) | |
| 16:07:07 | bauzas | at least, I'd say a Wishlist | |
| 16:07:18 | gibi | ssh key creation worked before should still work :) | |
| 16:07:25 | sean-k-mooney | well didnt we already agree not to add supprot for generating other keytypes | |
| 16:07:32 | bauzas | that ^ | |
| 16:07:34 | sean-k-mooney | we talked about this for the fips work | |
| 16:07:42 | sean-k-mooney | and said we shoudl deprecate that part of the api | |
| 16:07:56 | sean-k-mooney | tempest was being modifed to generate teh keys its self | |
| 16:08:26 | gibi | ohh, so we support importing other ecdsa already | |
| 16:08:30 | bauzas | that's why I say it shouldn't be a bug | |
| 16:08:32 | gibi | *other like | |
| 16:08:55 | sean-k-mooney | nova will accpeat any public key you provide and we also support x509 certs for windows | |
| 16:09:13 | sean-k-mooney | we just dont support turning the parmaters if you ask nova ot generate the key | |
| 16:09:17 | gibi | then yeah, I can be convinced to drop the key generation support | |
| 16:09:30 | kashyap | gibi: Good to know; I've read somewhere (unless I'm hallucinating) that ECDSA keys weren't supported | |
| 16:09:38 | bauzas | importing should continue to work | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | generating should stop if so | |
| 16:09:49 | bauzas | but, | |
| 16:09:55 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: there was a limiation imposed by pycryptography | |
| 16:10:00 | bauzas | "should" means a spec I guess | |
| 16:10:14 | bauzas | definitely not a bug | |
| 16:10:15 | sean-k-mooney | we use the ssh public key to encypt some things | |
| 16:10:35 | sean-k-mooney | so if you use a ECDSA key you need a pycryptography version that also supprot it | |
| 16:10:46 | sean-k-mooney | but i belive our min requiremnts cover that now | |
| 16:10:49 | gibi | bauzas: so a spec for removing ssh key generation support in a new microversion | |
| 16:10:57 | gibi | bauzas: as far as I understand | |
| 16:11:02 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 16:11:05 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:11:09 | gibi | works for me | |
| 16:11:38 | bauzas | I can ask the reporter at least but I'm not sure he would do it :) | |
| 16:12:04 | bauzas | if we really want to deprecate the generation, someone elso would need to provide the spec | |
| 16:12:08 | gibi | let's add it to the PTG etherpad to see if somebody volunteers | |
| 16:12:15 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:12:28 | sean-k-mooney | i mean i can proably do it if no one else puts there hand pu | |
| 16:12:37 | bauzas | I'll close the bug and say we'll discuss this at the PTG | |
| 16:12:54 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I will have free time too probably ;) | |
| 16:12:57 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'm just afraid of deprecating it without explaining why correctly | |
| 16:13:07 | sean-k-mooney | im pretty sure we have a downstream bug for this which we set to wontfix | |
| 16:13:24 | sean-k-mooney | ack ya we shoudl explain the reasoning in the spec | |
| 16:13:32 | bauzas | anyway, closing the upstream bug and discussing this at the TPG | |
| 16:13:40 | bauzas | . | |
| 16:13:46 | bauzas | any other bug ? | |
| 16:13:50 | gibi | - | |
| 16:13:56 | bauzas | cool, moving on | |
| 16:14:09 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:14:14 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:14:19 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:14:24 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:14:39 | bauzas | nothing new here | |
| 16:15:04 | bauzas | and I haven't seen any CI job failure for the moment | |
| 16:15:09 | bauzas | moving on, then , | |
| 16:15:11 | bauzas | ? | |
| 16:16:01 | bauzas | looks so | |
| 16:16:14 | bauzas | there it goes to the crux | |
| 16:16:16 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:19 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:26 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-rc1 RC1 is now due on March 10th | |
| 16:16:32 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-rc-potential Etherpad for RC tracking | |
| 16:16:50 | bauzas | the etherpad is pretty silent | |
| 16:16:59 | sean-k-mooney | i have one other bug to add to that | |
| 16:17:07 | bauzas | cool then | |
| 16:17:09 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: reenable greendns in nova. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830966 | |
| 16:17:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1964149 | |
| 16:17:13 | sean-k-mooney | that one ^ | |
| 16:17:21 | bauzas | we only have 2 days and fwiw the RC1 patch is already created | |
| 16:17:44 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/832412 RC1 patch for nova | |
| 16:17:54 | bauzas | I'll -1 until we merge what we want | |
| 16:17:56 | bauzas | elodilles: ^ | |
| 16:18:00 | elodilles | bauzas: ack | |
| 16:18:17 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I will check after the meeting | |
| 16:18:44 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ack | |
| 16:19:11 | bauzas | that being said, I'm happy with +1ing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/832416 | |
| 16:19:29 | bauzas | do people are afraid if we merge the placement RC1 change by now ? | |
| 16:19:49 | bauzas | I haven't seen any bugfixes so far needing to hold | |
| 16:20:08 | gibi | I have no objections | |
| 16:20:38 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think we have anything pendign for placement | |
| 16:20:42 | sean-k-mooney | so no objection | |
| 16:21:15 | bauzas | cool, will do after the meeting | |
| 16:21:45 | bauzas | so, I'll review the RC1 related bugs today and tomorrow | |
| 16:22:06 | bauzas | any other bug people think it would be needed to merge before RC1 ? | |
| 16:22:41 | bauzas | reminder, after RC1, we branch stable/yoga which means that only regression bugs would be accepted for RC2 and other RCs | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | any other bugfix would need to hold until Yoga GA (end of March) for being backported to stable/yoga | |