| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-28 | |||
| 15:09:13 | yuval | bauzas: ^updated | |
| 15:09:24 | bauzas | yuval: great, thanks | |
| 15:10:18 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219 | |
| 16:05:09 | chateaulav | bauzas: thanks very much! | |
| 16:09:37 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368 | |
| 16:09:37 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219 | |
| 16:09:38 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883 | |
| 16:14:56 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368 | |
| 16:16:20 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219 | |
| 16:16:35 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883 | |
| 16:32:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update compute rpc version alias for yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831077 | |
| 16:32:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: doc: mark the max microversion for yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831075 | |
| 16:34:27 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add grenade-skip-level irrelevant-files config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831229 | |
| 16:34:53 | dansmith | gmann: ^ | |
| 16:36:37 | gmann | dansmith: ack | |
| 17:01:29 | gibi | bauzas: did we missed the cycle highlight deadline for yoga? | |
| 17:01:42 | bauzas | orly ? | |
| 17:02:14 | bauzas | man, I missed them | |
| 17:02:42 | gibi | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027361.html | |
| 17:02:48 | gibi | me too | |
| 17:03:02 | bauzas | yeah the ff trampled me under the bus | |
| 17:03:42 | bauzas | gibi: it was under my radar as you always proposed some | |
| 17:03:43 | gibi | good point | |
| 17:03:55 | gibi | (the PTL doc update)_ | |
| 17:04:07 | bauzas | priority #1, I'm working on the cycle highlights | |
| 17:04:20 | bauzas | gibi: anything in particular you'd like to see mentioned ? | |
| 17:04:37 | bauzas | I was about to mention the policy thing, unified limits, the ARM support | |
| 17:04:40 | gibi | unified limits so people can try and provide feedback, | |
| 17:04:47 | bauzas | yeah | |
| 17:04:54 | bauzas | this one is obvious | |
| 17:04:54 | gibi | yeah, policy and emulation both good to mention too | |
| 17:05:19 | bauzas | don't know if the lightbits os thingy is marked on the cinder side | |
| 17:06:01 | bauzas | elodilles: I apologize about missing the cycle highlights, writing such things as we speak | |
| 17:06:14 | bauzas | diablo_rojo isn't in the chat | |
| 17:27:24 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: around ? could you tell me a one-liner for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458/14/specs/yoga/approved/integration-with-off-path-network-backends.rst ? | |
| 17:28:22 | sean-k-mooney | all of the nova part is done | |
| 17:29:27 | bauzas | can we say it's a cycle highlight ? | |
| 17:50:34 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: still around ? | |
| 17:50:45 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 17:51:51 | sean-k-mooney | oh sec | |
| 17:52:13 | sean-k-mooney | sorry was talking to artom and kashyap on a call | |
| 17:52:24 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ill quick chekc if the neutron part is merged | |
| 17:52:30 | sean-k-mooney | but yes i think it should be a release highlight | |
| 17:52:56 | sean-k-mooney | i assume you are working on the release prelude | |
| 17:54:07 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the neutron part is tracked under this RFE bug https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F1932154 | |
| 17:54:11 | sean-k-mooney | and it is all merged | |
| 17:54:17 | sean-k-mooney | as of 5 days ago | |
| 17:54:40 | bauzas | that's for the cycle highlight | |
| 17:54:44 | bauzas | not the prelude yet | |
| 17:55:41 | sean-k-mooney | "In the Yoga release support was added for network backends that leverage smartnics to offload the contolplane form the host server" | |
| 17:56:45 | sean-k-mooney | "this enables increased securtiy by removing the contol plane form the host server and reduced overhaed by leveraging the cpu and ram resouces on modern smart nics" | |
| 17:56:54 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: somethign like that ^ | |
| 17:57:06 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 18:00:51 | elodilles | bauzas: no problem, i think we are still in time with the cycle highlights :) | |
| 18:02:33 | bauzas | one last bullet to add | |
| 18:10:59 | bauzas | gibi: if you're still there, any placement cycle hightlight worth to mention ? | |
| 18:11:20 | bauzas | honestly, don't think so, any-traits is not really something for endusers | |
| 18:11:39 | sean-k-mooney | well it depends | |
| 18:11:55 | sean-k-mooney | any traits is something for project but perhaps unified limites | |
| 18:12:01 | sean-k-mooney | i assume that will already be covered | |
| 18:12:21 | sean-k-mooney | i guess unifed limits is more a nova/keystone highlight | |
| 18:12:25 | sean-k-mooney | even if it is useing placment | |
| 18:13:50 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: gibi: gmann: melwitt: chateaulav: dmitriis: your reviews are worthy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/831241 | |
| 18:14:52 | chateaulav | bauzas: Awesome! | |
| 18:14:54 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sure, my context was only for placement cycle highlights | |
| 18:15:07 | bauzas | chateaulav: thanks for your hard work and dedication | |
| 18:15:33 | bauzas | chateaulav: even if I had no time to review your changes :) | |
| 18:15:43 | chateaulav | lol | |
| 18:16:24 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368 | |
| 18:20:03 | gmann | bauzas: thanks for that, checked policy one and almost looks good. 1 comment to add doc link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/831241/1/deliverables/yoga/nova.yaml#20 | |
| 18:20:22 | gmann | feel free to rephrase the line to minimum text or so | |
| 18:20:59 | bauzas | gmann: given we're late, I prefer to leave it like this but I can rephrase the wording for the prelude section | |
| 18:22:10 | gmann | bauzas: sure, that works too as this is just highlights and people do/expected to check the prelude and releasenote. | |
| 18:22:16 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 18:22:53 | gmann | +1 on patch | |
| 18:24:48 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 18:25:08 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219 | |
| 18:25:47 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219 | |
| 18:26:22 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883 | |
| 18:30:52 | bauzas | lo | |
| 18:31:00 | bauzas | ok, zuul failed, me respins | |
| 18:35:16 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/831241 | |
| 18:37:27 | sean-k-mooney | ack thanks ill look again once i hit send on this email | |
| 18:39:09 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Fix unit test for oslo.context 4.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831244 | |
| 18:39:46 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 18:40:55 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: have you seen https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/829599/ | |
| 18:41:22 | sean-k-mooney | im goign to see what is required to fix not so far its just one unit tes | |
| 18:41:24 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: bauzas pushed the fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831244 | |
| 18:41:39 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok | |
| 18:41:40 | gmann | functional test are all good, yeah it is just one test | |
| 18:41:55 | sean-k-mooney | ok cool | |
| 18:42:13 | sean-k-mooney | ill repond to the mail i just sent and add your change then review it | |
| 18:42:37 | gmann | ohk, sure | |
| 18:48:47 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: one final nit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/831241/2/deliverables/yoga/nova.yaml#19 | |
| 18:48:55 | sean-k-mooney | other then that i think im +1 on that | |
| 18:50:15 | sean-k-mooney | basicaly its not clear to me if you intened to say operator are not encuraged to use the new scopes until we switch to it next cycle or they are encured to enable it before we enabel it by default | |
| 18:50:46 | sean-k-mooney | ""operators are | |
| 18:50:48 | sean-k-mooney | encouraged to start using it until | |
| 18:50:50 | sean-k-mooney | """ | |
| 18:50:57 | sean-k-mooney | is ambiguous | |