| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-02-24 | |||
| 11:03:40 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ok yuval if you add a follow up patch with a release note we can review that quickly | |
| 11:04:01 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ya just saw the question re flags | |
| 11:04:16 | sean-k-mooney[m] | i thihk that was a leftover form a previous patch | |
| 11:05:41 | sean-k-mooney[m] | oh its for the retires | |
| 11:05:53 | sean-k-mooney[m] | that is what they ment to set in the test | |
| 11:07:07 | sean-k-mooney[m] | although they asserted its default value in the test so not entirly needed | |
| 11:17:37 | yuval | hey | |
| 11:17:40 | yuval | I am here | |
| 11:17:57 | yuval | release note ok | |
| 11:18:08 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 11:18:17 | bauzas | yuval: do you know how to do it ? | |
| 11:18:58 | yuval | last time I add it in cinder I copied an existing release note and edited it. | |
| 11:19:11 | yuval | need to keep the correct format etc | |
| 11:19:34 | sean-k-mooney[m] | we have a tool | |
| 11:19:51 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you can do tox -e venv reno new lightos | |
| 11:20:05 | sean-k-mooney[m] | that will create a release note you can edit | |
| 11:20:22 | sean-k-mooney[m] | then you can test that its valied with tox -e releasenotes | |
| 11:20:43 | bauzas | yuval: no, let me give you the doc | |
| 11:21:18 | yuval | ok | |
| 11:21:28 | sean-k-mooney[m] | in this case you can delete all sections except feature where you should provide a short overview of the feature and any version requirements | |
| 11:21:40 | sean-k-mooney[m] | e.g. this need lightos version X | |
| 11:22:27 | bauzas | yuval: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/releasenotes.html | |
| 11:22:58 | bauzas | yuval: just use the 'features' section for the YAML file | |
| 11:23:12 | bauzas | yuval: also, I had a nit for a test | |
| 11:23:23 | bauzas | yuval: could you just reply on gerrit ? | |
| 11:23:32 | yuval | yes, I saw I didnt understand it actually | |
| 11:23:43 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821606/16/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/volume/test_lightos.py#28 | |
| 11:24:31 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ok going to grab coffee. brb | |
| 11:31:28 | gibi | bauzas: I'm +2 on the unified limits series. Is it OK with you if I go back and plug the missing +As to the series? | |
| 11:31:45 | bauzas | gibi: sure | |
| 11:31:50 | gibi | ack, on it | |
| 11:31:51 | bauzas | do this if you want | |
| 11:53:00 | sean-k-mooney | :) i care about that landign but also know i do not have the time before FF to load the context required to review it properly so i have been staying away from the series | |
| 11:56:42 | gibi | melwitt: I have a small question in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/789963 | |
| 12:23:22 | opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: driver/secheduler/docs for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/822053 | |
| 12:23:23 | opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | |
| 12:24:36 | chateaulav | gibi: fixed the pep8 error, i promise this is the last time the driver patch will be updated, focus is on the zuul patch today | |
| 12:26:28 | gibi | chateaulav: no worries :) | |
| 12:32:49 | sean-k-mooney | given gibi has +2'd the first two patches i take it this series is generally in a good postion for review | |
| 12:33:01 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yes | |
| 12:33:15 | sean-k-mooney | cool i will try an take a look at them shortly so | |
| 12:33:26 | gibi | the last patch adds the gate testing, that still has some failing tempest test but most of the tempest already green | |
| 12:33:38 | gibi | which is a good sign that the emulation actually working | |
| 12:35:00 | sean-k-mooney | ack do we want to hold +w until that last ci patch is green im not going to +w until we are happy with all 3 fo the feature patches as i think this should all merge at once anyway but is the zuul job part of the DOD | |
| 12:35:28 | sean-k-mooney | oh the feature is now only 2 patches | |
| 12:35:44 | sean-k-mooney | oh right the third is the ci patch | |
| 12:35:57 | chateaulav | sean-k-mooney: correct | |
| 12:36:30 | chateaulav | i figured once that one is green ill remove it from check, that way you guys can implement it the weekly and periodic\ | |
| 12:37:19 | sean-k-mooney | honestly im ok with havign one emulated env in check | |
| 12:37:28 | chateaulav | ok | |
| 12:37:44 | sean-k-mooney | but if we want to test others i would put them in the periodic weekly pipeline | |
| 12:38:10 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I'm OK to land the feature today even without the CI path, I think the current state of the CI result on the CI patch already looks good enough | |
| 12:38:12 | sean-k-mooney | its very unlikely that a change woudl break mips emulation but not arm | |
| 12:38:54 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ack ok ill focus on the first too so then take a look at the ci patch | |
| 12:39:57 | sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: the m1.tiny flavor size might break some senario tests due to sapce if ti does i think m1.micro is big enough for arm cirros but small then m1.tiny | |
| 12:40:36 | sean-k-mooney | for now lets leave it as you have it and see if it breaks anything | |
| 12:40:37 | chateaulav | ok | |
| 12:42:23 | yuval | File "/home/yuval/workspace/opendev/nova/nova/virt/driver.py", line 129, in <module> | |
| 12:42:23 | yuval | "supports_remote_managed_ports": os_traits.COMPUTE_REMOTE_MANAGED_PORTS, | |
| 12:42:23 | yuval | AttributeError: module 'os_traits' has no attribute 'COMPUTE_REMOTE_MANAGED_PORTS' | |
| 12:42:31 | yuval | I get this while running unittests | |
| 12:42:40 | yuval | what I am doing wrong? | |
| 12:43:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Lightbits LightOS driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821606 | |
| 12:43:10 | gibi | yuval: you need to rebuild you tox env | |
| 12:43:22 | gibi | yuval: it probably has an old os-traits lib | |
| 12:43:30 | yuval | tox -e ? | |
| 12:43:35 | gibi | yuval: try tox -r -e <env> | |
| 12:43:37 | yuval | or remove it | |
| 12:43:39 | gibi | the -r is the rebuild | |
| 12:43:43 | yuval | ok | |
| 12:43:44 | gibi | or you can remove .tox dir | |
| 12:43:46 | yuval | thanks | |
| 12:43:55 | yuval | yes I will try it if it wont work | |
| 12:44:06 | sean-k-mooney | yuval: ya this is likely just an old os-traits version | |
| 12:44:16 | sean-k-mooney | the other way to fix it is to manually install it | |
| 12:44:42 | sean-k-mooney | .tox/<env>/bin/python3 -m pip install -U os-traits | |
| 12:45:19 | sean-k-mooney | that is also how you can locally test with os-triats changes that are not released | |
| 12:45:51 | gibi | bauzas, gmann: I'v started re-reading the policy series and I have concerns about assisted volume snapshot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828994/7/nova/api/openstack/compute/assisted_volume_snapshots.py#42 | |
| 12:45:52 | sean-k-mooney | just replace os-triats with the path to the git repo on disk | |
| 13:00:45 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Register defaults for undefined hw image properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800708 | |
| 13:00:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: manage: Add image_property commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824392 | |
| 13:02:55 | yuval | hey added release note | |
| 13:05:44 | yuval | I got a little mixed up with git issues | |
| 13:06:00 | yuval | I edited the changes without pulling latest version | |
| 13:06:09 | yuval | then had to rebase | |
| 13:06:47 | yuval | ahhh | |
| 13:06:59 | yuval | its merged before I added the release note | |
| 13:07:11 | yuval | ok, I am uploading a followup | |
| 13:10:05 | gibi | yuval: release not as a follow up is OK | |
| 13:11:19 | sean-k-mooney | yuval: since you have not pushed yet can you reference the gerrit change id for the lightos feature patch in the commit | |
| 13:11:55 | yuval | its a special syntax or just followup for: <changeid> | |
| 13:12:19 | sean-k-mooney | no special syntax so followup for: ... is fine | |
| 13:12:31 | sean-k-mooney | just makes it simpler to corralate them in the future | |
| 13:12:40 | sean-k-mooney | you will still need the normal change id | |
| 13:13:23 | sean-k-mooney | in the normal way but if you reference the other one in the commit message body we can copy paste and find the relevent review if we ever need too in the future | |
| 13:14:24 | opendevreview | yuval proposed openstack/nova master: Lightos driver release note https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830817 | |
| 13:15:15 | sean-k-mooney | cool commit message looks fine ill review the rest later | |
| 13:16:18 | opendevreview | yuval proposed openstack/nova master: Lightos driver release note https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830817 | |
| 13:16:59 | yuval | thank you | |
| 13:33:43 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: chateaulav im also +2 on the emulation patches. i think the testign coudl be imporved in the futrue but just wanted to point out that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/822053/63 is in merge conflict | |