Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-18
15:57:07 sean-k-mooney if so im not sure if you can use provider.yaml to twaak the make unit
15:57:26 sean-k-mooney gibi: do you rememebr if that can tweak non custom resouce classes?
15:57:55 jamespage ussuri for this particular deploy
15:58:50 gibi Only CUSTOM_* resource classes and traits may be managed this way.
15:58:56 gibi so no
15:59:00 gibi https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/managing-resource-providers.html
15:59:07 sean-k-mooney ya ok
15:59:13 sean-k-mooney it was afetr ussuri anyway
15:59:51 sean-k-mooney jamespage: best we likely could do is a config option that could posible be backported to set or clamp the max unit
16:00:16 sean-k-mooney or just not mix for now
16:00:17 gibi we merged in victoria
16:01:51 sean-k-mooney jamespage: sorry i cant really be more help there. you could write a custom filter to do the same thing out of tree and load that in the env since its plugable
16:02:36 jamespage sean-k-mooney: no worries - you have been more that helpful in getting my knowledge up to speed in this area :)
16:02:36 sean-k-mooney for existign deployment that is the only way to make mixing numa/non numa on the same host somewhat ok but it still risks OOM events
16:03:12 sean-k-mooney ok i need to go do some other things and my home insure is not done so ill be afk now until monday
16:03:24 sean-k-mooney enjoy your weekends folks o/
16:04:17 gibi o/
16:51:35 gibi chateaulav: sorry I run out of time today. I will try to look at the issue tomorrow
16:51:38 gibi o/
16:52:38 chateaulav thats sounds good, i think im in the right place and have been playing around with the tests for compute node.
18:33:19 opendevreview Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Improve remote-managed port test coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829974
18:34:25 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368
21:03:52 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: block_device_info: Add swap to inline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826523
21:03:53 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Improve creating images INFO log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826524
21:03:53 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove defunct comment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826525
21:03:54 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: default by_name image_type to config correctly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826526
21:03:54 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: image_meta: Add ephemeral encryption properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760454
21:03:55 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: BlockDeviceMapping: Add encryption fields https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760453
21:03:55 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: BlockDeviceMapping: Add is_local property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764485
21:03:56 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Update bdms with ephemeral encryption details when requested https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764486
21:03:56 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: virt: Add ephemeral encryption flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760455
21:03:58 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: Add an ephemeral encryption pre filter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/760456
21:03:58 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: block_device: Add DriverImageBlockDevice to block_device_info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826527
21:04:00 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: block_device: Add encryption attributes to image and ephemeral disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826528
21:04:00 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: virt: Add block_device_info helper to find encrypted disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826529
21:04:02 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: blockinfo: Add encryption details to the disk_info mappings when provided https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772272
21:04:02 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Add disk_info_mapping as an optional attribute of Image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826530
21:04:04 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: privsep: Move qemu-img create calls under nova.privsep.qemu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826750
21:04:04 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: privsep: Return QemuImgInfo objects from qemu-img info calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826751
21:04:06 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: privsep: Add encryption support to qemu-img create command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826752
21:04:06 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Report ephemeral encryption traits based on imagebackend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826753
21:04:08 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Configure and teardown ephemeral encryption secrets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826754
21:04:08 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Add support to libvirt_info for LUKS based encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826755
21:04:10 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Cache the key manager when disk is encrypted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826756
21:04:10 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273
22:02:32 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: object/notification for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828369
22:02:32 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: driver/secheduler/docs for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/822053
22:02:33 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-19
06:09:24 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Complete phase-1 of RBAC community-wide goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829866
06:10:30 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Complete phase-1 of RBAC community-wide goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829866
16:29:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: backporting computenode with new hvspec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829989
16:30:19 gibi chateaulav: ^^ create a unit test that simulate the grenade failure and figured out the problem.
16:31:32 gibi dansmith: when you are around. I need you expert opinion on the ovo side of ^^ I filed a bug describing what either a sortcoming of OVO backport logic or a missundertanding on my side about how to do a proper backporting in this case https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.versionedobjects/+bug/1961482
18:14:49 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: backporting computenode with new hvspec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829989
20:45:05 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830010
20:59:07 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830010
22:40:07 chateaulav gibi: appreciate the look
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-20
00:19:56 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Make more project level APIs scoped to project only https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828670
01:08:12 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Server actions APIs scoped to project scope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824358
01:52:39 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Modify remaining APIs as per RBAC new guidelines https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828994
01:59:55 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Modify remaining APIs as per RBAC new guidelines https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828994
02:03:12 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Separate flavor extra specs policy for server APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829626
02:05:47 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Separate flavor extra specs policy for server APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829626
02:06:28 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Complete phase-1 of RBAC community-wide goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829866
04:29:47 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Complete phase-1 of RBAC community-wide goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829866
10:16:50 gibi sean-k-mooney, bauzas: I'm wondering that calling out to the sysfs of the compute host from nova's neturon code is something that breaks the virt driver separation. I mean the neutron interface code is called from the compute manager and that should be virt driver agnostic so it cannot assume it runs on Linux with sysfs. Currently we do call out to sysfs here
10:16:55 gibi https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/0c31561792e0e13a9f8267e71fa484ab79957f04/nova/network/neutron.py#L1572-L1584
10:18:09 gibi in comparision when I introduced pf_interface_name information for each VFs I did so via the virt driver instead of calling out to sysfs from the neutron code in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/623543
15:19:02 gmann gibi: bauzas: dansmith: rbac series is ready, pushed last patch with release notes also https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fpolicy-defaults-refresh-2
15:20:35 gmann gibi: fixed your comment about swap volume API permission to continue the existing way cinder is accessing - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828670/4
18:11:44 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830010
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-21
00:36:59 opendevreview Miguel Lavalle proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fix race with DPDK and vhostuserclient mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/830103
09:41:01 bauzas hola folks
09:41:38 gibi bauzas: o/
09:41:41 bauzas Uggla: looks like your karma helped my server to be back alive :)
09:41:58 bauzas just by a gchat ping, wow
09:41:59 gibi gmann: thanks I've started reading it this morning
09:42:14 bauzas gmann: will review it
09:43:06 Uggla bauzas, first time it happens to me! :) Most of the time I find bugs. ;)
09:43:19 bauzas it was fun
09:44:07 bauzas I was fighting for 2 hours with a rasppi not wanting to resurrect and like 1 min after your ping and like 10 reboots, it eventually rebooted
09:44:26 bauzas maybe a fsck
09:45:02 bauzas just take one day off and be prepared about a bad day :p
09:47:35 Uggla I have a question regarding: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/yoga/approved/libvirt-virtiofs-attach-manila-shares.html
09:50:50 Uggla Regarding the model we have share_mapping table and instance_uuid as a field. If I'm not wrong we have a one to one relationship between share and instance, correct ?
09:53:20 Uggla But a share can be attached to several instances. So the model may need to be changed. Am I wrong ?
09:56:02 bauzas hmmmm
09:57:07 Uggla I would say we need a share_uuid field on the instance table to have a 1 to n relation ?
09:58:31 Uggla I could update the spec, but I would like to know if I have understand it well.
10:01:44 bauzas Uggla: oh, I just read again the spec
10:02:11 bauzas Uggla: nothing prevents you to have a share_mapping table with multiple share_uuid records having the same UUID
10:03:23 Uggla so we will have several records for the same share with a diff uuid.
10:03:36 Uggla so we will have several records for the same share with a diff instance_uuid.
10:03:38 bauzas I guess lyarwood wanted to tell we would do the same like for BlockDeviceMapping table
10:04:24 bauzas where we have a UC be the mapping UUID itself
10:04:31 bauzas not the volume UUID
10:04:44 bauzas Uggla: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/db/main/models.py#L590
10:05:38 bauzas either way, the PK on the bdmmapping table is a single 'id' key
10:05:38 kashyap Some more documentation on it - https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/block-device-mapping.html
10:06:00 bauzas thanks kashyap

Earlier   Later