| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-01-25 | |||
| 15:16:43 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: no i mean backend | |
| 15:16:53 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/xena/ovn-auxiliary-port-bridge-live-migration.html#nova-neutron-events | |
| 15:17:03 | sean-k-mooney | this is unrelated to the connectivy question | |
| 15:17:13 | bauzas | holy shit, we actually don't need to have it WIP | |
| 15:17:48 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, TBH, I don't remember now, let me check | |
| 15:17:50 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: stephens patch? im pretty sure it worked in the past | |
| 15:18:58 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: i dont see the constant defiend in neutron-lib | |
| 15:19:06 | sean-k-mooney | so i think this is missing again | |
| 15:19:24 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, this is part of VIF_DETAILS | |
| 15:19:32 | ralonsoh | we don't need to add it to the API | |
| 15:19:33 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: neutron: Allow to spawn VMs with port without IP address https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/669411 | |
| 15:19:39 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: yes you do | |
| 15:19:43 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: stephenfin's rebased patch without WIP | |
| 15:19:54 | sean-k-mooney | the keys in VIF_DETAILS are part of the prot binding extenion | |
| 15:20:04 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, yes, but not the content | |
| 15:21:06 | sean-k-mooney | we normaly defien the keys of vif_details here https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/master/neutron_lib/api/definitions/portbindings.py#L76 | |
| 15:21:19 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/master/neutron_lib/api/definitions/portbindings.py#L49-L76 | |
| 15:21:32 | sean-k-mooney | so if you have not defiend the key there its a bug IMO | |
| 15:21:52 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, I didn't add anything to the vif details yet | |
| 15:21:56 | ralonsoh | I missed that part | |
| 15:22:08 | sean-k-mooney | ack so the backend is not specifed ok | |
| 15:22:24 | sean-k-mooney | so nova still cannot make decsion based on if its ovn | |
| 15:22:38 | sean-k-mooney | vs ml2/ovs | |
| 15:23:37 | ralonsoh | yeah sorry, I really missed that part | |
| 15:23:46 | ralonsoh | it will be this release for sure | |
| 15:24:27 | sean-k-mooney | ack no worries. i dont have time to start usign it this cycle anyway | |
| 15:24:50 | sean-k-mooney | but when its there we might be able to adress some of the livmigratio/move op issue we have with ovn | |
| 15:25:08 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: on a related note we have merged the self-annouch change so that should help with ovn migration downtime | |
| 15:25:17 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh:i have started the backports too | |
| 15:25:36 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, perfect | |
| 15:53:00 | bauzas | last reminder : nova meeting in 8 mins here | |
| 15:53:05 | bauzas | s/8/7 | |
| 16:00:10 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:10 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jan 25 16:00:10 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:10 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:10 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:17 | bauzas | gosh I was late | |
| 16:00:26 | bauzas | howdy | |
| 16:00:29 | gibi | of a whole 10 seconds :) | |
| 16:00:55 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:01:08 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:21 | bauzas | should be a quick one | |
| 16:02:10 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:20 | bauzas | okay, let's start | |
| 16:02:25 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:29 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:32 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 36 new untriaged bugs (+4 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:37 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:02:41 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 23 open stories (-2 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:02:51 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:02:51 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement | |
| 16:03:01 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 25 open stories (+2 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:03:08 | bauzas | there it is | |
| 16:03:15 | bauzas | (sorry, wrong paste) | |
| 16:03:33 | bauzas | any bug to discuss ? | |
| 16:03:45 | gibi | yepp that +2 is the two any-traits ticket that are open again as I pushed implementation | |
| 16:04:12 | bauzas | okidoki thanks | |
| 16:05:03 | bauzas | ok, let's continue | |
| 16:05:17 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:21 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:25 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:05:29 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:05:48 | bauzas | that's been a while since I've seen a gate failure | |
| 16:06:03 | sean-k-mooney | as a house keeping thing | |
| 16:06:05 | bauzas | so, /me crosses fingers for the last 5 weeks | |
| 16:06:19 | sean-k-mooney | do we want to continue to suggest filing elastic-recheck patches | |
| 16:07:17 | gibi | it was probably ignored so far so I'm not against dropping it | |
| 16:07:46 | sean-k-mooney | well it was more related to the fact infra will be discontinuing it eventually | |
| 16:07:59 | sean-k-mooney | and im not sure how many reviw the repo | |
| 16:08:00 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: well, good question | |
| 16:08:17 | sean-k-mooney | its not really imporant but as a new contibutor i migth get confused | |
| 16:08:20 | bauzas | at least I'll leave to ask to create bug report | |
| 16:08:25 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:08:33 | bauzas | ok, done. | |
| 16:09:03 | gibi | agree about asking for bugreports tagged with gate-failure | |
| 16:09:24 | bauzas | gibi: done => Ctrl-R for https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting :) | |
| 16:09:34 | gibi | thanks :) | |
| 16:10:01 | bauzas | moving | |
| 16:10:05 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:10:11 | bauzas | #info FeatureApprovalFreeze was Jan 13st | |
| 16:11:11 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 4 weeks | |
| 16:11:33 | bauzas | (actually, 4.5 but meh) | |
| 16:12:02 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking | |
| 16:12:07 | bauzas | I started to update it | |
| 16:12:27 | bauzas | if people can look at it, it would be nice | |
| 16:12:40 | bauzas | and if owners can provide their changes, it would be super too | |
| 16:12:59 | bauzas | for the moment, I'm not asking to review them | |
| 16:13:10 | gibi | bauzas: can I add the any-traits placement feature to the pad? | |
| 16:13:17 | bauzas | gibi: sure | |
| 16:13:23 | bauzas | actually, this would be better | |
| 16:13:40 | bauzas | as I was only looking at the nova features | |
| 16:14:01 | bauzas | so yeah, we should look at this etherpad rather than launchpad | |
| 16:15:49 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:15:52 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:15:59 | sean-k-mooney | i have bookmarked that now | |
| 16:17:19 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:17:25 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:18:28 | bauzas | nothing to tell | |
| 16:18:46 | sean-k-mooney | i have one topic for opendiscuss by the way when we get there just an fyi | |
| 16:18:48 | bauzas | maybe next week, we should wonder whether we should provide new priorities as we would be closer to ff | |