Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-12
10:03:57 EugenMayer ah - i see. so it was 'nova back then'. Sorry i was not here back then
10:04:13 EugenMayer understood. The nova here is the 'old network nova nowdays replaced by neutron'
10:04:34 sean-k-mooney1 it was nova when nova did networking
10:04:39 EugenMayer This also means that particular patch has no affect/sense today. Could be entirely oncovereed
10:04:45 sean-k-mooney1 but today its in neutron
10:05:02 EugenMayer i see. As so often, thank you for clearing the fog out for me!
10:05:17 sean-k-mooney1 EugenMayer: i think that code has been entirly deleted a release or two ago
10:05:54 sean-k-mooney1 https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/master/nova/network
10:06:10 EugenMayer I see. Do you know of any position right now if people basically are at 'use split DNS or deal with the consequences?'
10:07:12 sean-k-mooney1 well its kind of an odd issue
10:07:26 sean-k-mooney1 in that you seam to be tryign to use the same ip for two things
10:07:39 sean-k-mooney1 using it as the default gateway and as a vm
10:09:01 sean-k-mooney1 like you would normally reserve the default gateway ip so it could not be used for floating ips
10:38:46 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Enable min pps tempest testing in nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811748
11:26:42 opendevreview Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Register defaults for undefined hw image properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800708
11:26:42 opendevreview Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP manage: Add image_property commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824392
12:24:58 opendevreview yuval proposed openstack/nova-specs master: lightos volume driver spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824191
12:58:33 sean-k-mooney gibi: bauzas im ok with the latest version of ^ by the way. given the scope fo the nova change is small i think this is more then enough detail for now
12:58:57 sean-k-mooney more detail can be included in the documentation and or cidner driver
13:00:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack, I will check back to that today
13:02:37 sean-k-mooney gibi while i have you regarding teh ttl for healthcheck
13:02:50 gibi yes
13:03:10 sean-k-mooney so you think i shoudl keep the ttl, remove the stale_multipleer and intoduce a new state unkonwn
13:03:28 sean-k-mooney and if the ttl is expired for a reading report it as unknown or pass?
13:03:52 sean-k-mooney or perhaps warn?
13:03:53 gibi keep the ttl, remove the stale_multiplier, do not introduce unknow state
13:04:00 sean-k-mooney ok
13:04:02 gibi move from fail -> pass if ttl expires
13:04:16 gibi basicaly if it is unknown the report pass
13:04:22 gibi that will attract trafic
13:04:38 gibi so if it is still faulty we will detect it
13:04:56 sean-k-mooney ok that works for nova-api certenly
13:05:20 sean-k-mooney not sure about other services
13:06:00 sean-k-mooney i think it shoudl be workable
13:06:14 sean-k-mooney ill incoperate that into the next version
13:06:40 sean-k-mooney i kind of feel like if all are expired the state shoudl be warn but we can debate that in the implemetion
13:06:49 sean-k-mooney unless you feel that shoudl be stated in the spec
13:07:24 sean-k-mooney for now i think im going to follow dansmith's advise of sepcify that warn is a viald value but in initally do not use it in the implemenation
13:07:46 gibi you view also make sense, we don't know the state so we warn that it might be faulty.
13:08:03 sean-k-mooney i.e. only start usign warn after we have the basic pass fail stuff workign
13:08:42 sean-k-mooney gibi ya so the IETF draft recommend treating warn as still "passing" but that somethign might be wrong
13:09:10 gibi I'm OK to define warn, but not use it in the first implementation
13:09:40 gibi maybe we can gather some feedback from the field what operators want to see when the service don't know the state of it dpes
13:09:43 gibi *deps
13:10:15 sean-k-mooney ya that sounds resonabl that we shoudl ask there input
13:10:43 gibi so I won't block on having warn
13:11:01 gibi with the same logic I would add ttl but not yet add stale_multiplier
13:11:11 gibi we can add that later if we want to use warn for stale
13:14:53 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044
13:18:09 chateaulav morning all
13:19:10 sean-k-mooney o/
14:01:08 chateaulav kashyap: can you link the spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044 to the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pick-guest-arch-based-on-host-arch-in-libvirt-driver
14:02:30 kashyap chateaulav: It is already linked to in the Whiteboard at the bottom, under "2022 Additions" -- are you looking for something more?
14:04:00 chateaulav ok gotcha, i know it has the "Set the URL for this specification" link above blueprint. wasnt sure if that needed to be set or not
14:04:25 chateaulav just want to make sure you all have everything to hopefully get the spec approved
14:06:47 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: we generally set the url to the html version of the spec when it has merged
14:06:58 sean-k-mooney you can set it to the review for now if you want
14:07:46 sean-k-mooney well o kashyap could but ya we normally wait for it to merge before we do that
14:08:37 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: everything looks correct to me form a lanuchpad point of view
14:08:48 sean-k-mooney so dont worry about that aspect
14:10:18 chateaulav cool, my first spec so wanted to make sure.
14:12:14 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: by the way regarding testing
14:12:32 sean-k-mooney i see two ways to approch this form a tempest point of view
14:13:09 sean-k-mooney you could extend tempest with expicite tests for booting with emulation and add some addtional senario tests gated bhind a feature flag
14:13:58 sean-k-mooney or we coudl just use tempest as is but tweak the job to use a non native arch image and set teh image proerty in via devstack local.sh
14:14:38 sean-k-mooney the latere woudl inovle adding addtional ci jobs to nova's pipepline
14:14:57 sean-k-mooney im not sure we really want to add + for every emulated achitrrue to run on every patch
14:15:25 sean-k-mooney but i would be supproted if haveing one emulated arch tested on every patch and runnign weekly jobs for the rest
14:19:12 chateaulav I think doing the tweak and having one designated arch run would be good
14:19:45 chateaulav as the overall goal is to ensure emulation is functional
14:19:46 sean-k-mooney ack so i would suggest testing aarch64 by default in the check pipline
14:20:10 sean-k-mooney and then addign all fo them to a the periodic-weekly pipline and then experimental pipeline
14:21:20 sean-k-mooney that way we can review the status of the other arch jobs in our weekly meeting without much impact to the ci workload
14:22:00 sean-k-mooney you could also filter the josb to only run on changes to the libvirt driver and compute module i can help with that
14:22:46 chateaulav sounds good. and greatly appreciated
14:43:45 opendevreview yuval proposed openstack/nova-specs master: lightos volume driver spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824191
15:47:21 opendevreview yuval proposed openstack/nova-specs master: lightos volume driver spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824191
15:47:43 yuval ^fixed doc auto testing
15:56:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add wrapper for oslo.concurrency lockutils.ReaderWriterLock() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824280
16:08:39 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044
16:32:30 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: List auth plugin parameters for [keystone] section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824458
17:01:45 opendevreview yuval proposed openstack/nova-specs master: lightos volume driver spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824191
17:46:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reproduce bug 1953359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820554
17:46:54 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Extend the reproducer for 1953359 and 1952915 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821943
17:56:23 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Move rule_if_system() method to base test class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824475
17:57:19 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Server actions APIs scoped to project scope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824358
18:23:14 chateaulav just a question, i may have miss read a the process docs. for submitting the spec should it be under nova-specs/specs/yoga/ as i currently have it under the implemented directory?
18:56:54 yuval chateaulav: I think the pep8 fails if you dont put it under approved/implemented
18:58:32 chateaulav ok, just want to make sure im not creating extra work
19:00:24 sean-k-mooney it shoudl be put under approved
19:00:29 chateaulav ok
19:00:35 sean-k-mooney and the name of the file shoudl match the blueprint name
19:00:44 chateaulav sean-k.mooney: thanks, will fix
19:00:53 sean-k-mooney you can run the check locally with "tox -e pep8,docs"
19:01:41 sean-k-mooney we have a script that will move it form approved to implemented if the feature is complted at the end of the cycle
19:01:59 sean-k-mooney i or other will run it and it uses the name of the file to check if the blueptirn is marked as complete
19:02:54 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/824044
19:05:28 chateaulav sean-k-mooney: ack, placed it in the right area now. my bad... lol. dont know if the +2 needs readded with the new patchset or if that auto adds itself.
19:07:07 sean-k-mooney it will be lost but ill try and review it tomorrow if i agree its ready i can fast approve but if not we will get to it tomorrow
19:07:40 opendevreview Iago Filipe proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated opts from VNC conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824478

Earlier   Later